• Title/Summary/Keyword: 소년사법과정

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

Factors Influencing to the Quality of Life of the Juvenile Delinquents in the Juvenile Justice Process (사법처리과정 청소년의 삶의 질에 영향을 미치는 요인)

  • Nam, Mi-Ahe
    • Korean Journal of Social Welfare
    • /
    • v.58 no.1
    • /
    • pp.265-290
    • /
    • 2006
  • The purposes of this study are: First, to investigate how the juvenile delinquents in the juvenile justice process evaluate their quality of life. Second, to examining which factors influence their quality of life. To accomplish these purposes, this study used sample of 570 juvenile delinquents in Seoul, Busan, Daejeon who are in the process of the juvenile justice and used the Korean Version of WHOQOL-BREF (brief version of WHO quality of life measure). To examine this purpose, Mean, standard deviation, t-test, One way ANOVA, multiple regression were conducted. The results are as follows: 1) juvenile delinquent in the process of the juvenile justice have complex problems and needs, and their quality of life are lower than the civil in the psychological, social relations, environment domain. 2) The factors influencing their quality of life in the general domain are stigma by parent, violent, undemocratic treatment in the process of the juvenile justice, family income level. But the factors of each domain of quality of life differ to some extent. Statistically significant factors of physical health domain are violent, undemocratic treatment in the process of the juvenile justice, first arrest time, stigma by others, sex, juvenile justice process. Significant factors of psychological health domain are delinquency frequency, stigma by parent, stigma by others, first arrest time, family income level, sex. Significant factors of social relations domain are first arrest time, stigma by parent, delinquency frequency, family income level, stigma by friend. Environment is significantly influenced by family income level, stigma by parent, sex, delinquency frequency, juvenile justice process.

  • PDF

The Study of the Correction and Perceived Social Support by the Juvenile Delinquents in the Juvenile Justice Process (소년사법처리과정에 있는 청소년이 지각한 사회적 지지와 교정성에 관한 연구)

  • Hong, Bong-Sun;Nam, Seung-Kyu;Nam, Mi-Ahe
    • Korean Journal of Social Welfare
    • /
    • v.51
    • /
    • pp.183-210
    • /
    • 2002
  • The purpose of this study is to investigate correction-level associated with the social support perceived by juvenile delinquents. To accomplish these purposes, this study used sample of 546 juvenile delinquents who are in the process of the beginning stage in the police and prosecution. Social support and correction were assessed with an instrument designed for this study. Juvenile delinquents completed instruments assessing the following variables: (1) perceived social support scale, specially social support types(esteem support, emotional support, informational support) and social support providers (parents, relatives, friends, teachers, community) (2) correction scale, specially social stigma, social deprivation, self reflection, legal consciousness, self concept. The resulting scale of the instrument had good internal reliability(Cronbach's alpha=. ) and was scored so that high scores indicated a willingness to access. To examine this purpose, One way ANOVA, multiple regression analysis were conducted. And the results are as follows: The relationship ratings of the correction factors were positively associated with their rating of the type of social support. Informational support was positively associated with self reflection and esteem support was positively associated with self concept, legal consciousness, self reflection and emotional support were positively associated with esteem. The type of support according to support providers was significant, explaining 25% of the variance in self concept scores. The significant predictor was esteem support from friends and emotional support from a community. The type of support according to support providers was significant, explaining 20% of the variance in legal consciousness scores. The significant predictor was informational support from teachers and esteem support from a community. The type of support according to support providers was significant, explaining 21% of the variance in self reflection scores. The significant predictor was esteem support and emotional one from relatives.

  • PDF