• 제목/요약/키워드: 세차계수

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.019 seconds

Bryan's Factor of a Hemispherical Resonator due to Coriolis Effect (코리올리 효과에 의한 반구형 진동 구조물의 세차계수)

  • Rhee, Huinam;Park, Sangjin;Sarapuloff, Sergii A.;Han, Sunu;Park, Jinho
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering Conference
    • /
    • 2014.10a
    • /
    • pp.457-460
    • /
    • 2014
  • Precession coefficient is defined by the ratio of the angular rate or rotational angle of the standing wave formed in an elastic resonator with respect to that of the platform. In this paper the precession of a hemispherical resonator due to Coriolis' effect is studied through Rayleigh-Ritz's method and Lagrangian Mechanics when the resonator undergoes Rayleigh's mode deformation. The calculation result was compared with studies by other researchers.

  • PDF

Heart-Model-Based Automated Method for Left Ventricular Measurements in Cardiac MR: Comparison with Manual and Semi-automated Methods (자동화 방식 모델 기반 좌심방 파라미터 측정법: 수동 및 반자동 방식과의 비교)

  • Chae, Seung Hoon;Lee, Whal;Park, Eun-Ah;Chung, Jin Wook
    • Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    • /
    • v.17 no.3
    • /
    • pp.200-206
    • /
    • 2013
  • Purpose : To assess the effect of applying an automated heart model based measurements of left ventricle (LV) and compare with manual and semi-automated measurements at Cardiovascular MR Imaging. Materials and Methods: Sixty-two patients who underwent cardiac 1.5T MR imaging were included. Steady state free precession cine images of 20 phases per cardiac cycle were obtained in short axis views and both 2-chamber and 4-chamber views. Epicardial and endocardial contours were drawn in manual, automated, and semi-automated ways. Based on these acquired contour sets, the end-diastolic (ED) and end-systolic (ES) volumes, ejection fraction (EF), systolic volume (SV) and LV mass were calculated and compared. Results: In EDV and ESV, the differences among three measurement methods were not statistically significant (P = .399 and .145, respectively). However, in EF, SV, and LV mass, the differences were statistically significant (P=.001, <001, <001, respectively) and the measured value from automated method tend to be consistently higher than the values from other two methods. Conclusion: An automatic heart model-based method grossly overestimate EF, SV and LV mass compared with manual or semi-automated methods. Even though the method saves a considerable amount of efforts, further manual adjustment should be considered in critical clinical cases.