• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2007.12a
• /
• pp.136-137
• /
• 2007

This study was to analyze the visual preference of the port landscapes for North port in Busan. Preference related variables came from Semantic Differential(SD) method and then were conducted by the factor analysis. Multiple regression was done for the relationship between the preference and factors. The result found 4 factors, including dynamics, stability, pleasantness and healthiness. Much importance was placed on dynamics among them. Therefore, building port landscapes and their image attracting viewers should consider dynamics in terms of port landscape plan and user attraction development for visual quality management.

• Journal of Navigation and Port Research
• /
• v.32 no.3
• /
• pp.265-269
• /
• 2008

This study was to analyze the visual preference of the port landscapes for North port in Busan. Preference related variables came from Semantic Differential(SD) method and then were conducted by the factor analysis. Multiple regression was done for the relationship between the preference and factors. The result found 4 factors, including dynamics, stability, pleasantness and healthiness. Much importance was placed on dynamics among them. Therefore, building port landscapes and their image attracting viewers should consider dynamics in terms of port landscape plan and user attraction development for visual quality management.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.1-26
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study was to develop a math test for identification of the mathematically gifted on the basis of their math creative problem solving ability and to evaluate the goodness of the test. Especially, testing reliability and validity of scoring method on the basis of fluency only for evaluation of math creative problem solving ability was one of the main purposes. Ten closed math problems and 5 open math problems were developed requiring math thinking abilities such as intuitive insight, organization of information, inductive and deductive reasoning, generalization and application, and reflective thinking. The 10 closed math test items of Type I and the 5 open math test items of Type II were administered to 1,032 Grade 7 students who were recommended by their teachers as candidates for gifted education programs. Students' responses were scored by math teachers. Their responses were analyzed by BIGSTEPS and 1 parameter model of item analyses technique. The item analyses revealed that the problems were good in reliability, validity, item difficulty and item discriminating power even when creativity was scored based on the single criteria of fluency. This also confirmed that the open problems which are less-defined, less-structured and non-entrenched were good in measuring math creative problem solving ability of the candidates for math gifted education programs. In addition, it was found that the math creative problem solving tests discriminated applicants for the two different gifted educational institutions.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.26 no.4
• /
• pp.699-719
• /
• 2016

Alternate pictures that are proven to be equivalent are in high demand to assess creative thinking and language skills. This study aimed to investigate the equivalence of three pictures ('Dog owners,' 'Lost Dog,' and 'Overslept') recently developed for use in a creative writing task. Middle school students (N=183) wrote a story in English based on one of the three prompts distributed randomly. Four writing features (fluency, syntactic complexity, lexical diversity, and temporality) were analyzed with Coh-Metrix and MANCOVA. The three prompts were largely equivalent in their capacity to detect differences among writers in all the features of writing. The difficulty levels of the three prompts, however, were not necessarily the same. Two prompts, Dog Owners and Lost Dog, were verified as equivalent prompts, and therefore, they are recommended as alternate forms to assess creative language skills in repeated measurements. The Overslept prompt had greater facility in eliciting diverse words and more temporal connectives in composing stories. The differential difficulty shown among the prompts suggests that the validity of using different picture versions in repeated assessment remains questionable unless those versions undergo equivalence verification.

• Korean Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.153-163
• /
• 2001

This study was attempted to investigate the discriminant validity of Korean version of Eating Attitude Test-26(KEAT-26) and to provide the sensitivity, specificity and efficiency according to cutting score, which may be useful to determine the optimal cutoff point on various purposes. The KEAT-26 was administered to 108 female patients with eating disorders, 179 female participants in body slimming center, 120 female athletic college students, 227 female college students, and 183 healthy normal women. Validity was tested by ANOVA and ROC curve analysis. The results revealed that the total score of the KEAT-26 showed a statistically significance between groups and that the score of the KEAT-26 of eating disorders group was significantly higher than that of the other groups in post hoc test. In comparison of the 4 subfactor score of the KEAT-26 between groups, significant differences in main effect within groups were found in all subfactors except factor IV. ROC curve analysis showed 80% of efficiency to discriminate eating disorders group from normal control group using cutoff score on maximum discriminant efficiency and 69% of efficiency to discriminate eating disorders group from high risk groups for eating disorders. Each cutoff score on maximum in efficiency was as follows ; 25 between eating disorders group and participants in body slimming center, 19 between eating disorders group and healthy normal woman, 23 between eating disorders group and athletic college students, 21 between eating disorders group and college students. Using 22(T score 65) of the KEAT-26 as the cutoff score, sensitivity was 54%, specificity was 84%, and overall efficiency was 80%. These results indicate that the KEAT-26 has a good discriminant validity in Korean population and also suggest that the KEAT-26 may be useful assessment tool to screen the disordered eating problems on clinical and epidemiological purposes.

• Journal of Environmental Policy
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.27-47
• /
• 2015

In this paper, we present a new empirical method to estimate the environmental efficiency of decision making units. We propose a model with a new approach that describes a network process consisting of two stages, production and wastewater abatement based on the data extracted from 51 Korean industrial complexes. Taking into account the inter-dependency of two stages, we show a process how to decompose the environmental efficiency into production efficiency and abatement efficiency. Moreover, our new proposed method can be used to explain the information on network relationship between economic growth and environmental protection.

• 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2008.05a
• /
• pp.103-106
• /
• 2008

신재생에너지기술 개발인력 확보는 국가 에너지 안보의 확보 및 지속적인 성장을 가능하게 하는 주요 요인이다. 관련 사업추진에 있어 비효율성의 제거와 인적자원 개발 정책의 효과적인 추진을 위해서 신재생에너지 인력양성 사업에 대한 체계적인 성과평가가 요구되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 신재생에너지 인력양성의 평가를 위하여 적용가능한 방법론을 살펴 보았다. 기존 인력양성 방법론의 구분을 수정하여 인력 양성의 평가 방법을 성과점검, 요인통제분석, 사업의 파급효과 산출방법으로 분류하고 각 기준별 세부방법론을 제안하였다. 성과점검 방식에는 단순환산/일반질문법, 요인통제분석에는 AHP-DEA효율성 측정방법, 인적자본 축적모형방법이 포함될 수 있다. 마지막으로 사업의 파급효과 산출방법에는 산업연관분석 방법, 인력양성 산업연관도 작성 방법이 있다. 제안된 모형 중AHP-DEA효율성 측정방법은 신재생 에너지 인력양성 평가에 적용될 경우 DEA 모형의 객관성이라는 특징을 최대한 이용하는 동시에, 한계로 지적될 수 있는 변별력 분제를 체계적으로 보완하기위한 방편으로 AHP를 도입함으로써 적절한 인력양성 평가 방법론으로 적용될 수 있을 것이다.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.16
• /
• pp.201-215
• /
• 2003

이 연구에서는 창의적인 문제해결능력을 검사하는 도구로 널리 알려진 개방형 문항 5 문제를 수정 또는 번역하여 중학교 2학년 학생들에게 적용하고 그 결과를 분석하였다. 검사도구에 대한 양호도 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 문항 내적 일관성 신뢰도(Cronbach ${\alpha}$)의 계수는 0.8이다. 둘째, 문항반응이론에 근거한 문항의 적합도 지수는 모두 1.2미만으로서 분석모형에 적합한 문항이라고 볼 수 있다. 또한, 문항간의 난이도의 차이는 로짓트 점수가 0.6을 넘지 않은 범위에서 골고루 분포되어 있다. 셋째, 문항 신뢰도 지수가 모두 0.80보다 높은 것으로 나타나 사용된 문항들은 서로 잘 분리되어 창의적 문제해결력을 추정하고 변별하는데 무리가 없다. 학생들의 반응에 대한 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 문항1에서 곡선을 이용한 반응은 영재학생들에서만 발견할 수 있었다. 문항2에 대한 각 반응의 독창성 점수는 모두 0이다 이것은 문항2가 널리 알려진 문제에 기인한 것으로 해석된다. 문항3은 영재학생들이 더 많은 반응을 보인 것으로 모든 반응이 독창성 점수를 부여받았다. 문항4에 대하여 일반학생들은 거의 반응을 하지 못하였다. 문항5는 대부분의 학생이 반응을 하였으며 반응의 종류도 가장 다양하였다.

• Journal of the Korean earth science society
• /
• v.24 no.3
• /
• pp.150-159
• /
• 2003

This study suggests methods of assessing scientific creativity and developing items, which can be achieved when both earth science knowledge and general creativity are applied at the same time. According to the results of this study, the cognitive ability gaps between creativity and scientific creativity were clearly defined by the terms' operational definition. Four factors in the Subcategory Of Scientific Creativity-fluency, flexibility, elaboration, and originality-were selected, and the possibility of developing items out of these factors was discovered. The operational definitions of the four factors were given and the criteria for assessment and scoring were set. The validity, reliability, discrimination, and difficulty, which were the conditions required for the assessment instruments, were verified through three field trials of inputting the assessment instruments for scientific creativity. The assessment instruments were composed of 8 items with 2items for each factor. The average item fitness index obtained was 0.99, Cronbach , the item inter-consistency was 0.79,the inter-rater reliability of each item was 0.78, the inter-rater reliability of each factor was 0.75, the item discrimination power was 0.19, and the item difficulty was 0.00. Because the results were within the permitted limit of the conditions required for assessment instruments, the assessment instruments developed for scientific creativity in this study can be said to be very favorable.

• Proceedings of the IEEK Conference
• /
• 2000.09a
• /
• pp.189-192
• /
• 2000

본 논문에서는 청각 장애인의 보다 향상된 보청 환경을 조성하고자 청각손실을 심리음향 모델을 적용하여 감음 신경성 난청을 보정하는 알고리즘을 제안한다. 제안한 알고리즘에서는 난청의 유형은 내이에서부터 중추 뇌에 걸친 감음계와 신경계의 장애에서 비롯되는 감음신경성 난청(sensorineural hearing loss)으로 주파수 영역상에서 MTH(minimum hearing threshold)가 균일하지 않게 상승하게되어 가청영역이 좁아지는 문제점을 해결하기 위한 방법으로 각각의 주파수 밴드마다 멀티밴드 압축 알고리즘을 적용하였다. 그러나 이 경우 각각의 주파수 밴드에 따른 서로 다른 가청 영역의 영향에 의한 변형된 스펙트럼 모양으로 인해 spectral contrast reduction과 변형된 마스킹 특성으로 인해 음성 변별력에 제한을 가하게 된다. 이것은 주변 주파수 성분들에 의한 마스킹 효과에 의한 것으로, 신호에 대한 난청인이 느끼는 지각 영역(perceptual domain)에서의 해석과 심리음향 모델 파라미터를 통한 보청기의 개발이 이루어져야 하며, 본 논문에서 그 알고리즘을 적용하였다.