• Title/Summary/Keyword: 선정평가지표

Search Result 980, Processing Time 0.027 seconds

A Development of the Service Evaluation Criteria for the Expressway Service Areas on the Side of Users (이용자측면의 고속도로 휴게소 서비스 평가지표 개발)

  • Won, Jaimu;Jin, Wonyoung
    • KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
    • /
    • v.32 no.5D
    • /
    • pp.421-427
    • /
    • 2012
  • This study develops the evaluation model which is for assessing on the side of users in expressway service areas, and researchers apply this study for monitoring expressway service areas by routes. The direction of development on Evaluation Criteria is all about on the side of necessity of rest area users, the reflection of current conditions, the construction of total evaluation criteria, and the examination of connecting study with current study. After that, this study examines previous evaluation criterias and researchers will select the primary provision of evaluation through FGI, and they derive the final evaluation criteria throughout the verification of suitability on Evaluation Criteria. Throughout AHP analysis which is a professional survey system of users, researchers dereive on the side of facilities, on the side of environments facilities, on the side of position, and on the side of services in order by the weightings. As you can see in this study, this study also considers quantitative and qualitative factors together, and it allows to evaluate conditions of rest areas. In addition, this study can be a primary study for suggesting the ways of improvements of rest areas by using Spider Map and for monitoring future study.

Ranking Decision in River Management Class Adjustments: Methodology (하천관리등급조정의 우선순위결정: 방법론)

  • Kang, Min-Goo;Kang, Boo-Sik;Lee, Joo-Heon;Park, Doo-Ho
    • Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
    • /
    • 2009.05a
    • /
    • pp.1754-1758
    • /
    • 2009
  • 본 연구에서는 개정된 하천법에 의거하여 지방하천들 중에서 국가하천으로 지정하기에 적합한 하천들을 선별하여 이들의 관리등급을 조정하기 위한 방법론을 개발하였다. 대상 하천들 사이의 관리등급조정에 대한 우선순위를 결정하기 위하여 다기준의사결정법을 적용하였다. 개발된 하천평가지수에서는 세부기준을 하천중요도, 하천관리상태, 하천관리능력으로 구분하였으며, 지형 및 수문학적, 사회 및 경제적, 환경적 측면에서 각 세부기준들을 평가할 수 있는 지표들을 선정하였다. 또한, 수자원 분야 전문가들을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하고 계층적 분석기법을 사용하여 평가기준들과 평가지표들의 상대적 중요도를 결정하였다. 국가하천지정 우선순위는 대상하천의 등급을 8개로 구분하고 각 등급 내에서 하천평가지수의 상대적 크기를 비교하여 결정하였다.

  • PDF

A Comparative Diagnosing Plan for Old Industrial Complex Competitiveness and Regeneration Districts based on Competitiveness Index (경쟁력 지표를 통한 노후산업단지 진단과 공모사업으로 선정된 재생사업지구 비교분석에 관한 연구)

  • Chang, Cheol-Soon;Kim, Joo-hoon
    • Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea
    • /
    • v.20 no.2
    • /
    • pp.245-258
    • /
    • 2017
  • Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport established a comprehensive plan for 83 old industrial complexes over 20-year. They implemented the competitiveness of industrial complex in September 2013, and revitalizing and remodelling comprehensive plan in December 2014. With significant influences of old industrial complex in September 2009, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport chose the 4 districts for the first pilot project. In December 2014, the second pilot project districts were established. In addition, there were 10 districts in April 2016 and 5 districts in April 2016 as the third pilot project and 5 distiricts in March 2017 as the fourth piolt project. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport currently suggests 23 districts to regenerate among 83 old industrial complex districts over 20 years. Even though the government suggests the certain 23 districts, this research selects the bottom 23 districts (30%) represented through the Focus Group Interview and compare them with the list government-suggested. As a result, there were some unlisted industrial complex districts. This research suggests the unlisted industrial complex districts which need to be regenerated and their problems, therefore this could be used as a guide for feasibility of old industrial complex regeneration implement.

Methodological Implications of AHP for Universal Design Evaluation Method (유니버설디자인의 평가방법에 있어서 AHP 기법의 적용 가능성)

  • Gu, Seung-Hwan;Yoo, Jun-Ho
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.12 no.7
    • /
    • pp.138-146
    • /
    • 2012
  • This paper is about a the evaluation method for universal design on AHP method. Evaluation of Universal Design to develop indicators of the seven principles of universal design and the tripod of Design(in Japan) Review of the PPP, and previous studies were chosen with reference to a indicators. Selected variables were analyzed using the AHP technique, Universal Design 7 elements were derived weights. Factor of the most important on universal design is 'Perceptible Information'(0.263), and 'Tolerance for Error'(0.207), 'Simple and Intuitive Use'(0.154), 'Low Physical Effort'(0.143) was in order. 'Size & Space for Approach and Use'(0.108) is then shown to be important, while the 'Equitable Use'(0.087), 'Flexibility in Use'(0.038) was rated relatively low importance. Based on the results reflected a weighted evaluation of universal design checklist is proposed. Process to obtain the weights can be applied to a variety of situations.

Ergonomic Evaluation of Indoor Bike Coordinated with Virtual Images (가상 영상과 조합된 실내 자전거의 인간공학적 평가)

  • Han, Seung Jo;Kim, Sun-Uk;Cho, Jae-Hyung;Koo, Kyo-Chan
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.15 no.5
    • /
    • pp.443-451
    • /
    • 2017
  • This paper's objectives are to investigate the criteria for ergonomic evaluation of indoor bike coordinated with virtual images, and to compare HMD-based VR bike with 2D-based one. 12 experts performed delphi method with an aim to determine ergonomic evaluation criteria that were classified into 4 categories(Usability, Emotion, User Values, Reality). 2D-based bike and HMD-based one were compared according to part of final criteria through fuzzy-logic question performed by 20 subjects. Though there were no confidential difference in usability, HMD-based VR bicycle resulted in greater scores than 2D-based one in elements related with emotion, user value and reality statistically. It is expected that this research results will be used as references to evaluate ergonomic design of other indoor exercise equipments combined with VR or AR.

Evaluation Criteria for Appropriateness of Bicycle Riding Path Considering Cyclist's Trip Purposes (자전거 이용자의 통행목적을 고려한 주행경로 적정성 평가지표 개발)

  • Kim, Eui-Jin;Kim, Dong-Kyu
    • The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport Systems
    • /
    • v.15 no.4
    • /
    • pp.12-25
    • /
    • 2016
  • The purpose of this study is providing an evaluation criteria for appropriateness of bicycle riding path considering trip purpose based on cyclist's response of importance and satisfaction. The survey presents a quantified criteria of evaluating appropriateness of the bicycle path by investigating difference of impotance and satisfaction between two purposes among 5 selected influence factors about bicycle lane and bicycle parking facility, and in case of commuting purpose, information of destination is additionally considered. All the influence factors are analyzed by Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) which yields importance. For the factors which have a huge difference between two purposes, evaluation criteria using a GIS Data of respondent's path and satisfaction of each factors is developed, and other factors are made it by reviewing literature. The importance analyzed by AHP and evaluation criteria can provide a path based LOS for cyclist, and this information can be improved through user's response from app or search engine in the future. and by considering individual's evaluation, it can provide individually specified information.

Development of Evaluation Indicators for a Children's Dietary Life Safety Index in Korea (한국 어린이 식생활 안전지수의 평가 지표 개발)

  • Chung, Hae-Rang;Kwak, Tong-Kyung;Choi, Young-Sun;Kim, Hye-Young P.;Lee, Jung-Sug;Choi, Jung-Hwa;Yi, Na-Young;Kwon, Se-Hyug;Choi, Youn-Ju;Lee, Soon-Kyu;Kang, Myung-Hee
    • Journal of Nutrition and Health
    • /
    • v.44 no.1
    • /
    • pp.49-60
    • /
    • 2011
  • This study was performed to develop a children's dietary life safety index required by the Special Act on Safety Management of Children's Dietary Life enacted in 2009. An analytical hierarchy process was used to obtain initial weights of dietary life safety evaluation indicators. The Delphi method was applied to develop the weights along with 98 food and nutrition professionals. Three representative policy indicators, nine strategy indicators, 11 main evaluation indicators, and 20 detailed evaluation indicators were selected for the children's dietary life safety assessment. Three policy indicators and nine strategy indicators were the following: children's food safety indicator (support level of children' safety, safety management level of children's favorite foods, and safety management level of institutional food service), children's nutrition safety indicator (management level of missing meals and obesity, nutrition management level of children's favorite foods, and nutrition management level of institutional food service), and children's perception and practice level indicator ("Dietary Life Law" perception level, perception, and practice level for dietary life safety management, perception, and practice level for nutrition management). Weights of 40%, 40%, and 20% were given for the three representative policy indicators. The relative importance of nine strategic indicators, which were determined by the Delphi method is as follows: For children’s food safety, support level of children's safety, safety management level of children's favorite foods, and safety management level of institutional food service were given weights of 12%, 9%, and 19%, respectively. For children's nutrition safety, the missing meals and obesity management level, nutrition management level of children's favorite foods, and the nutrition management level of institutional food service were given weights of 13%, 11%, and 16%, respectively. The "Dietary Life Law" perception level, perception and practice level of dietary life safety management, and perception and practice level of nutrition management were given weights of 4%, 7%, and 9%, respectively.

The Evaluation of Physical Environmental Factors in Urban Parks for Healthy City - Focus on Seoul - (건강증진을 위한 도시공원의 물리적 환경요소 평가 - 서울시를 대상으로 -)

  • Chae, Jin-Hae;Kim, Won-Ju
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
    • /
    • v.48 no.4
    • /
    • pp.29-40
    • /
    • 2020
  • This study quantitatively and qualitatively analyzes the physical environment for health promotion in urban parks by indicators that were selected in consideration of overseas cases and previous studies. To evenly distribute the areas to be evaluated by region, Seodaemun Independence Park, Hongneung Park, Gocheok Park, Sillim Park, Cheongdam Park, Gaepo Park, and Sungin Park were selected among the old neighborhood parks already established in Seoul. The evaluation indicators consist of quantitative indicators (12 factors classified into the three categories of the surrounding environment, the park characteristics, and the park facilities) and qualitative indicators (14 factors classified according to the five categories of accessibility, safety, convenience, activities, and amenities). These indicators were selected after conducting advisory meetings with experts in the field. The physical environment perception factors were evaluated by experts and investigators by field inspections and were rated on a three-point scale (high, medium, low). According to the results of the analysis, first, not only were exercise facilities and trails, but also various factors which support health activities, such as rest areas, leisure spots, and cultural facilities, as well as accessibility, cleanliness, and drinking water facilities are important indicators for health promotion. Second, even if the requirements are met for quantitative factors, several inconveniences hinder the actual implementation or use in the qualitative evaluation. Thus, both quantitative and qualitative evaluations must be simultaneously performed for the proper judging of the physical environment of a park. Third, upon conducting a qualitative evaluation of the physical environmental factors, score differences depended on the evaluated categories in each park. These differences show that indirect indicators, such as accessibility, safety, and facility convenience are insufficiently equipped compared to direct indicators, such as activity, which includes exercise facilities and fitness centers for health promotion. As the utilization rate of parks is increasing due to COVID-19, more efforts should be made to improve park services in the post-corona era. To promote such services, it is necessary to regularly evaluate parks based on both quantitative and qualitative indicators and to contemplate services not only through direct factors but also indirect factors and security measures.

Technological Assesment on Public R&D Activities (정보통신 공공 R&D 기술성 평가)

  • 여인갑
    • Proceedings of the Korea Society of Information Technology Applications Conference
    • /
    • 2002.11a
    • /
    • pp.433-439
    • /
    • 2002
  • In this paper, we implemented technology assessment on the public R'||'&'||'amp;D activities in If field in order to select the promising technologies, so called 'star technology,' making for national industry development. Technology assessment frame in this study included qualitative factors. If technologies are classified five sector - network, wireless/broadcasting, SW/application, computer/terminal equipment,somiconductorjcomponent. Expert opinion interviews on each field are carried out. Assessment factors consist of technology usefulness and technology competitiveness. In the final analysis, 23 technology items selected as a promising technologies and the results can be used public R'||'&'||'amp;D planning and IT industry policy

  • PDF