• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• 제36권1호
• /
• pp.51-60
• /
• 2006

Gingival recession is clinically manifested by an apical displacement of the gingival tissue and dentin hypersensitivity is often used to describe a painful condition in which exposed dentin is unduly sensitive to intraoral stimuli. The objects of this study were primarily to investigate the prevalence and distribution of gingival recession and hypersensitivity and secondarily to determine whether a relationship exists between gingival recession and hypersensitivity. The study population was 195 patients (102 males, 93 females) who were attended the department of periodontology, Pusan National University Hospital. 189 patients exhibited gingival recession at least more than 1 tooth, the prevalence was 96.9%. The maxillary and mandibular first premolar and mandibular incisors had the highest prevalence. The majority of patients (139 patients, 71.3%) were diagnosed as having dentin hypersensitivity. Dentin hypersensitivity was determined to 3 seconds application of cold air to the exposed root surface after isolating the test tooth and was commonest in maxillary and mandibular first premolars and mandibular incisors. Relationship between recession and hypersensitivity was analyzed using chi-square test (p=0.05), significant relation (p=0.000) was existed. Gingival recession was more severe, the prevalence of hypersensitivity was higher.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제35권2호
• /
• pp.134-142
• /
• 2010

이 연구의 목적은 상아질 지각과민증 모드의 Er,Cr:YSGG 조사가 복합레진 수복물의 미세인장 결합강도에 미치는 영향을 평가하는 것이다. 20개의 발거된 대구치를 사용하여 Er,Cr:YSGG 레이저 적용 유무와 사용된 접착제 시스템(Optibond FL과 Clearfil SE bond), 산의 적용 시간(15초와 20초)에 따라 여섯 그룹으로 나누었다. 노출된 교합면 상아질에 레이저 조사 후 접착제를 도포하고 복합레진으로 수복하였다. 24시간 동안 실온의 증류수에 보관 후 각 그룹 당 12개의 시편을 준비하였다. 모든 시편의 미세인장 결합강도를 측정하고 파절 양상을 관찰하였다. 더불어 레이저를 조사한 시편과 조사하지 않은 시편을 주사현미경을 이용하여 관찰하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 레이저를 조사한 그룹은 레이저를 조사하지 않은 그룹보다 낮은 미세인장 결합강도를 나타내었다. 2. 레이저 조사 유무와 관계없이, Optibond FL이 Clearfil SE bond보다 높은 미세인장 결합강도를 나타냈으며, Optibond FL을 사용했을 때 산부식 시간이 20초인 경우가 15초인 경우보다 더 높은 값을 나타내었다. 3. 레이저를 조사한 상아질의 SEM 사진은 관간상아질보다 관주상아질이 더 두드러져 보이며, 상아세관이 열려있으며 도말층은 관찰되지 않았다.

• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.230-243
• /
• 1996

Root surface exposure due to gingival recession after periodontal surgery, dentin exposure after root planing elicit pain response when exposed to mechanical, heat, chemical or osmotic stimulation. Especially, patients treated with periodontal surgery, show high frequency and there have been reports showing the 1 out of 7 patients have dentin hypersensitivity. There have been many studies on the clinical effects of various materials on the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. but, none could provide absolute clinical efficacy. In this study, 45 teeth from 30 patients, who had had periodontal surgery and showed dentin hypersensitivity after surgery were chosen for the experimental group and they were illuminated with laser, 15teeth were chosen for the control group and they were not exposed to laser. After this dentin hypersensitivity was elicited by tactile, compressed air, cold water and then, the degree was evaluated using NRS(Numerical Rating Scale). And during LLLT(Low Level Laser Therapy) semiconductor laser using Gallium - Arsenide as a diode was illuminated for 180 seconds at a frequency of 7(500Hz). This therapy was done 10 times, and each time the changes in dentin hypersensitivity was evaluated using NRS. The results were as follows : 1. After treat with LLLT on dentin hypersensitivity due to periodontal surgery, 22.2% showed total loss of dentin hypersensitivity, 60.0% showed loss of tactile dentin hypersensitivity, 48.8% showed loss of compressed air dentin hypersensitivity, 22.2% showed loss of cold water dentin hypersensitivity. 2. As a result of clinical evaluation of dentin hypersensitivity using NRS, there was significant increase in improvement of dentin hypersensitivity in the experimental group compare to the control group(P<0.05). And there was almost no natural loss of dentin hypersensitivity in the control group. 3. In comparison of the stages of evaluation, there was significant difference in between experimental and control group. after the second visit(P<0.05), and the difference increased with each visit.