• Monthly Duck's Village
• /
• v.63 no.9
• /
• pp.72-77
• /
• 2008

상속은 재산뿐만 아니라 채무 즉 빚도 상속이 된다는 것은 이제 누구라도 알고 있다. 따라서 빚을 상속받는 것이 싫으면 상속을 포기하면 되는데 상속인 본인만 포기하면 되는 것으로 알고 본인만 상속포기를 했다가는 나중에 자식에게 빚이 상속되는 안타까운 경우가 종종 발생한다. 따라서 상속을 포기할 때는 자기만 포기할 것이 아니라 상속순위에 들어가 있는 모든 사람들이 포기를 해야 한다. 예로 아버지가 많은 빚을 남기고 사망했는데 부인과 자식이 있었다고 할 때 부인과 자식이 상속을 포기하면 자식의 아들, 즉 손자에게도 상속이 된다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2013.07a
• /
• pp.181-184
• /
• 2013

우리 민법에 상속인이 민법 제1019조 제1항의 기간 내에 한정승인 또는 포기를 하지 아니한 때에는 단순승인을 한 것으로 본다고 하여 그동안 상속인들에게 지나치게 불리하다는 비판을 받아왔던 규정이 1998년 8월 27일 선고된 헌법재판소 결정(96헌가 22 등)에 의하여 헌법불합치결정을 받았다. 이에 따라 2002년 1월 14일 법률 제6591호로 공포 시행된 개정민법 제1019조 제3항으로 "민법 제1019조 제1항의 규정에 불구하고 상속인은 상속채무가 상속재산을 초과하는 사실을 중대한 과실 없이 제1항의 기간 내에 알지 못하고 단순승인을 한 경우에는 그 사실을 안 날부터 3월내에 한정승인을 할 수 있다."는 규정이 신설되었다. 그러나 민법 제1019조 제3항은 상속인들에게 구제의 길이 열리기는 하였으나 상속인의 보호가 제한적이고 상속인에게 한정승인만을 허용하고 상속포기의 선택을 제한하여 상속인의 승인 포기의 선택권행사에 문제가 있다고 본다. 따라서 이 논문에서는 상속의 승인과 포기에 관한 문제점을 검토해보고 상속인과 이해당사자들 간 모두에게 불리함이 없이 가장 공평하고 합리적인 개선방안을 제시하고자 한다.

• 가정의 벗
• /
• v.34 no.8 s.396
• /
• pp.20-20
• /
• 2001

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.175-185
• /
• 2013

The judgement which is subject of research has denied legal rescission of division of the inherited property by agreement based on (1) the fact that the division of inherited property terminated at the time of concluding mutual agreement in its nature while only the relationship of claim and obligation between the inheritor who has paid for such obligation and the inheritor who has acquired such obligation in the mutual agreement remains (2) and the fact that the legal stability is considerably hindered as the re-partition of inherited property having retroactive effect becomes unavoidable in case of approving the legal rescission of the division of the inherited property by agreement. But it is reasonable to also approve legal rescission on the division of the inherited property by agreement in case the division by agreement actually has the nature such as conditional donation between joint heirs (1) from the fact that the division of the inherited property by agreement gets the nature of disposal equivalent to exchange, transfer and abandonment of share between joint heirs in actuality, (2) and the fact that there are no other theories in approving the validity of mutually agreed rescission despite the fact that the re-partition of inherited property having retroactive effect is unavoidable even in case of the mutually agreed rescission of the division by agreement among all joint heirs. However, as the division of the inherited property by agreement is a contract that gets concluded only if all joint heirs participate, even the legal rescission for the reason of not fulfilling the obligations paid by one party of the heirs during the division by agreement must be considered as possible only by expression of intentions from all other joint heirs excluding this one party.

• Korean Security Journal
• /
• no.17
• /
• pp.255-276
• /
• 2008

The important items, which should be considered in Private Investigation Law, can include subjects, licenses, the scope of business, qualifying examinations, and supervisory and penal provisions. The subjects of Private Investigation Law should be permitted to be both natural persons and juridical persons in terms of providing various services, but should be permitted to be juridical persons and should be administered on a license system, even in order to ensure public interests. Concretely, the introduction scope of Private Investigation Law can be regulated to include the followings: that is, investigating the whereabouts identification of runaways and missing children, investigating the personal identification, habit, way of action, motivation, whereabouts identification, real child confirmation, association, transaction, reputation, and personality of specific persons or specific groups, investigating the whereabouts identification of missing persons, owners of government-vested properties or renounced properties, investigating the whereabouts of lost properties or stolen properties, investigating the causes of fire, character defamation, slander, damage, accident, physical disability, infringement on real estate or movable property, and investigating all sorts of accidents including traffic accidents, insurance accidents, and medical malpractices. In the qualifying examination, examinees' age should be restricted to be over age 25. The person, who is exempted from its primary examination, should be restricted to be the person, who has the career of over 20 years in related fields, in consideration of its equity with other certificates of qualification. In the supervisory institution, as the policy institution is the supervisory institution in many countries including France (the police) and Japan (public security committee), so the National Policy Agency should be the supervisory institution in consideration of management aspects. In the penal regulations, especially, we should clarify the management of personal information (personal information protection, personal information management), and so should prevent the infringement of people's basic rights, and then should ensure the public interest.