• Title/Summary/Keyword: 산전환율

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.021 seconds

Improved Organic Removal Efficiency in Two-phase Anaerobic Reactor with Submerged Microfiltration System (침지형 정밀여과시스템을 결합한 이상 혐기성 시스템에 의한 유기물 제거율의 향상)

  • Jung, Jin-Young;Chung, Yun-Chul;Lee, Sang-Min
    • Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers
    • /
    • v.22 no.4
    • /
    • pp.629-637
    • /
    • 2000
  • A two-phase anaerobic reactor with a submerged microfiltration system was tested for its ability to produce methane energy from organic wastewater. A membrane separation system with periodic backwashing with compressed air was submerged in the acidogenic reactor. The cartridge type of microfiltration (MF) membrane with pore size of $0.5{\mu}m$ (mixed esters of cellulose) was tested. An AUBF (Anaerobic Upflow Sludge Bed Filter: 1/2 packed with plastic media) was used for the methanogenic reactor. Soluble starch was used as a substrate. The COD removal was investigated for various organic loading with synthetic wastewater of 5,000 mg starch/L. When the hydraulic retention time (HRT) of the acidogenic reactor was changed from 10 to 4.5 days, the organic loading rate (OLR) varied from 0.5 to $1.0kg\;COD/m^3-day$. When the HRT of the methanogenic reactor was changed from 2.8 to 0.5 days, the OLR varied from 0.8 to $5.8kg\;COD/m^3-day$. The acid conversion rate of the acidogenic reactor was over 80% in the 4~5 days of HRT. The overall COD removal efficiency of the methanogenic reactor showed over 95% (effluent COD was below 300 mg/L) under the highly fluctuating organic loading condition. A two-phase anaerobic reactor showed an excellent acid conversion rate from organic wastewater due to the higher biomass concentration than the conventional system. A methanogenic reactor combined with sludge bed and filter, showed an efficient COD and SS removal.

  • PDF

The Anaerobic Biodegradability and Methanogenic Toxicity of Pulping Wastewaters (펄프페수의 혐기성 생분해능 및 메탄 생성균의 독성에 관한 연구)

  • 박종안;허준무;장봉기
    • Journal of Environmental Health Sciences
    • /
    • v.24 no.1
    • /
    • pp.70-79
    • /
    • 1998
  • 본 실험의 목적은 다양한 펄프제조 조건과 여러 형태의 리그노 셀루로우스 성분이 펄프폐수의 혐기성 생분해에 미치는 영향을 규명하는 것이다. 실험에 사용된 폐수는 일반적으로 펄프 제조시에 발생되는 폐수를 대상으로 하였으며, 펄프제조 조건은 TMP공정과 소다 펄프공정을 적용하였다. 혐기성 생분해 가능성 시험 및 독성실험은 $35\pm 2\circ$C의 중온상태에서 입상슬러지를 식종물질로 사용한 회분식 반응조를 이용하였다. TMP공정의 배출되는 폐수는 산으로의 전환율이 총 COD기준으로 68-87%로 매우 높은 혐기성 생분해 가능성을 보였다. 그리고 TMP공정폐수는 일반적으로 제지폐수 처리시 독성농도라고 알려진 농도에서도 메탄생성균에 독성을 주지 않았고, 또한 COD 10g/l의 농도에서도 처리에 저해가 일어나지 않았다. 반면에, 알카리성 상태에서 준비된 펄프폐수의 경우는 생분해성이 매우 낮아서 대략 50%정도의 산전환율을 보였으며, 메탄생성균에 상당한 저해를 주었다. 메턴생성균의 활성도에 50%저해를 주는 농도는 2.1~5.4 gCOD/l였다. 알카리성 펄프폐수의 독성에 대한 추가 실험결과 펄프내 wood resin이 산이나 중성 pH부근에서는 잘 용해가 되지 않고 알카리성 상태에서 쉽게 용해되어 메탄생성균에 저해를 나타내는 것으로 밝혀졌다. 따라서 펄프제조시 나무성분이 알카리성분과 접촉할 경우 후속하는 혐기성 처리공정의 메탄생성균에 심각한 저해를 줄 수 있다.

  • PDF

Effect of prophylactic indomethacin in extremely low birth weight infants (초극소 저출생체중아에서 예방적 indomethacin 투여효과)

  • Lee, Bo Lyun;Kim, Su Jin;Koo, Soo Hyun;Jeon, Ga Won;Chang, Yun Sil;Park, Won Soon
    • Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics
    • /
    • v.49 no.9
    • /
    • pp.959-965
    • /
    • 2006
  • Purpose : The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of prophylactic indomethacin on reduction of patent ductus arteriosus(PDA) and intraventricular hemorrhage(IVH) in extremely low birth weight infants(ELBWI). Methods : Retrospective review of 84 ELBWI who were admitted to our neonatal intensive care unit from June 2004 to April 2006 was performed. Patients were divided into prophylactic group(n=28) and control group(n=56), where prophylactic indomethacin were given within 6 hours after birth. Clinical outcomes were compared between these groups. Results : There were no significant differences in gestational age, birth weight, incidence of hemodynamically significant PDA and severe IVH, and mortality between prophylactic group and control group. However, there were more frequent indications for therapeutic indomethacin, higher incidence of intestinal perforation, and longer time to achieve full enteral feeding in prophylactic group than control group. The incidence of other adverse events attributed to indomethacin prophylaxis did not differ between two groups. Conclusions : Prophylactic indomethacin may not prevent hemodynamically significant PDA and severe IVH in ELBWI. On the contrary, it may be associated with increased risk of adverse events. Further efforts should be investigated to decrease PDA and severe IVH in ELBWI.