• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
• /
• 2023.05a
• /
• pp.355-356
• /
• 2023

The ripple effect is analyzed in the post-construction evaluation phase, but only the qualitative analysis and simple numerical fluctuations are analyzed, thus, no reliable ripple-effect analysis has been conducted. Therefore, in this study, a focus group interview was conducted with 10 experts to propose a plan to improve the ripple effect metrics. Consequently, by linking with the policy-effect metrics of the pre-feasibility study, it is expected that the utilization of the analysis results will be improved and objective and quantitative analysis will be possible.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.9 no.1
• /
• pp.111-121
• /
• 2004

This paper presents the methods of evaluating validity and effectiveness of informatization budget investment for e-Government, through the preliminary evaluation. the progress evaluation and the Post evaluation of the investment, and a quantitative evaluation model which improves conformance of IT ROI (Return On Investment) using the evaluation results. the right evaluation targets of informatization investment for the development project to GDOC(Government electronic Document Distribution Center), and KPIs(Key Performance Indexes) which is enable to evaluate objectively effectiveness in the preliminary and the post evaluation phases are developed, and according to using the quantitative evaluation model . improved effectiveness evaluation results for each index in the point of view of usage and innovation are come out.

• Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
• /
• v.24 no.4
• /
• pp.375-385
• /
• 2015

This study analyzed international case studies on Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) follow-up and suggested implications based on the study's findings to aid implementation of SEA follow-up in Korea. SEA requires follow-up in order to identify unforseen adverse effects and enable appropriate remedial action to be taken. Tool kits and methodological framework for effective SEA follow-up are only being researched recently. Based on the study's findings, following implications for implementing SEA follow-up in Korea were drawn. First, the system of carrying out SEA follow-up would be different depending on the PPP topic. During the scoping stage, significant impacts should be identified according to the PPP topic, and thus help determine the indicators to be developed in the later stage. Secondly, responsibility, method, time, intervals and actions from SEA follow-up may vary depending on the target SEA consultation. Thirdly, the indicators of SEA follow-up may be considered together with various environmental standards and current political, social and economic indicators which are a big issue in society. Fourthly, SEA follow-up can be used as an integration system of its target planning and environmental planning. Finally, SEA feedback system should be needed. The result of SEA follow-up should be used for target PPP. These would lead to improvements to the target PPP. If SEA follow up is successfully implemented and actively carried out for domestic PPPs, Korea can be a step closer to realization of sustainable development.

• 한국IT서비스학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2008.05a
• /
• pp.185-190
• /
• 2008

정보화의 진전과 더불어 삶의 편이성은 증대되고 있으나 개인과 조직은 물론이고 국가에 이르기까지 정보보안 사고로 피해와 고통 또한 증대되고 있는 실정이다. 이러한 사고로 인한 피해를 사전에 예방하거나 사후 손실을 최소화하기 위해서는 적절한 관리가 필요하며 이를 위해서는 무엇보다 실용적인 정보보안 평가지표의 개발이 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 정보보안을 대표하는 문헌을 참조하여 평가지표를 도출하고, 일련의 부합성 분석을 통해 보다 실용적인 정보보안 평가지표를 도출하여 제시하고자 한다.

• 한국디지털정책학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2006.12a
• /
• pp.237-255
• /
• 2006

국내 정부부처 및 지역자치단체에서 수행하고 있는 연구개발 프로젝트의 선정과 평가에 관한 연구는 광범위하게 이루어지고 있다. 그러나 각 정부 부처별로 실시하는 평가프로세스와 지표의 경우 부처별 특성과, 과제의 특성을 반영하기 위한 프로세스와 지표를 개별적으로 보유하고 있으나, 과제의 평가를 수행하는 조직의 규모나 지역적 특색을 반영하기 어렵다.본 연구는 C 지역의 테크노파크(TechnoPark) 사업자가 수행하는 지역 자치단체 중심 R&D 프로젝트의 특성과 지역적인 특색을 반영한 평가관리 시스템을 개발하고자 한다. 본 연구에서는 먼저 국내 출연연구기관 및 정부부처에서 수행하는 평가시스템의 특성을 파악하고, 각 기관에서의 평가프로세스와 평가지표들을 조사하여 공통적/개별적 특성을 분류하였다. 분류된 프로세스와 지표들과 C 지역의 지역/산업적 특색을 분석하고 C 지역에서 수행한 3년간의 모든 과제에 대한 분석을 수행하여 지역적인 특색을 반영한 평가프로세스와 지표를 도출하였다. 또한 연구개발 프로젝트의 선정평가를 위한 사전 기술성 평가를 위한 기술가치평가와, 프로젝트의 수행결과 이후 나타나는 부가적인 효과를 분석하기 위하여, 프로젝트단위의 균형성과지표를 적용하여 프로젝트의 사후/추적관리 방안을 제시하고자 한다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.16 no.5
• /
• pp.269-281
• /
• 2016

This research made a evaluation indicators of public management system for operating efficient urban and housing redevelopment. We analyzed how satisfaction of participants about the evaluation indicators are used to parameters and affects intension of participation structure by using PLS structural equation model. We choose result evaluation tools: Foucs Group Interview and Balanced Score Card for appraising public management system. Specifically, We categorized setting business planning and selecting business tool, operating participation groups, motivating participation, post management and sustainability, and economics of business. As a results of the evaluation, setting business planning and selecting business tool, post management and sustainability, and economics of business influence comprehensive satisfaction. Post management and sustainability, economics of business, and setting business planning and selecting business tool turned out that they are very influential in the arranged order.

• Journal of Energy Engineering
• /
• v.24 no.3
• /
• pp.142-149
• /
• 2015

The aim of this study was to develop a evaluation indicator to collaborative energy saving projects with NGO. We set the indicator based on expert advice, and refer to the preceding case study. The indicator has been set for the purpose of analyzing in planning, execution, performance phase to projects. In planning phase these consist of indicator such as project selection and rating, projects goals and concrete plans, etc; and systematic way of projects promotion, projects management and follow-up, and participation on selected contents, etc in execution phase; and achieve their goals, participant satisfaction, etc in performance phase.

• Water for future
• /
• v.52 no.10
• /
• pp.72-77
• /
• 2019

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.90-109
• /
• 2002

The national nuclear R&D projects have been implemented for the purpose of supply of nuclear power which was proved to be safety and stability. Evaluating the national nuclear R&D projects has critical importance in nu-clear energy management aspect. This paper employs multi-attribute utility analysis as a basis for obtaining an evaluation index to assess the national nuclear R&D projects using a specific case study of Korea. To structure and quantify basic values for the evaluation, we elicited important attributes, then refined and structured them into a hierarchy. A multi-attribute index is constructed as a multi-attribute utility function, based on value judgments provided by a group of technical experts, policy makers, and faculties. As a result, the objective of attainment of a proposed object is given the highest priority, followed by appropriateness of project and research strategy, utilization of research output, within attribute ranges defined for the attributes. We found that the work and results of this study can provide valuable insights and decision opportunities for virtually all major decision making in evaluation of the national nuclear R&D projects in Korea.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.20 no.10
• /
• pp.45-56
• /
• 2020

This study is about the scale to evaluate the data of the countermeasures in the 'simulation based government exercise' (tentative name). The criteria and weighting of the scale is a standard for evaluating the data of each agency input. This maintains the objectivity and consistency of the evaluation, which complements the subjective evaluation of the observer. Therefore, the criteria should accommodate the purpose of the government exercise evaluation, the possibility of measurement in the simulation environment, the objectivity, no-duplication and causality between criteria, and the grade applying the evaluation results, and the weighting should be set. In this study, three major criteria of timeliness, accuracy, and appropriateness is set up for the evaluation scale and it consists of sub-criteria classified into three classes below respectively and the concept of it was defined. The weighting was calculated by AHP analysis considering the hierarchical structure of it. When this evaluation scale is applied to the 'simulation based government exercise' in the future, it will be possible to secure consistency and objectivity of the evaluation of measures by integrating the quantified evaluation into the observation evaluation and to conduct AAR by scientific techniques.