• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.16 no.4
• /
• pp.191-225
• /
• 2014

Most of all, this paper analyzes the current situation of EU(European Union) and ascertain EU's economic condition in terms of tariff lines and non-tariff barriers. and the purpose of this article is to find out the problems of EU's tariff lines and non-tariff barriers. Next, We suggest some future direction of export promotion from Korea to EU more largely for our companies. First, this paper describes the characteristics and outline of EU. The EU is a politico-economic union of 28 member states that are primarily located in Europe. The EU traces its origins from the European Coal and Steel Community(ECSC) and the European Economic Community(EEC), formed by the Inner Six countries in 1951 and 1958, respectively. After that, The Maastricht Treaty established the European Union under its current name in 1993. The latest major amendment to the constitutional basis of the EU, the Treaty of Lisbon, came into force in 2009. There are a combined population of over 500 million inhabitants and generated a nominal gross domestic product(GDP) of 16.692 trillion US dollars in EU. The results are as follows ; First of all, In terms of tariff lines and customs duties, Our companies have to know precisely EU's real tariff lines and other customs duties, and such as value added tax and exercise tax, corporate tax regulated by EU commission and EU's 28 members. second, our companies have to confirm EU's non-tariff barriers. such as RoHS, WEEE, REACH. These non-tariff barriers could be hindrances or obstacles to trade with foreign companies in other countries. We perceive all companies exporting to EU are related with these Technical Barriers to Trade irrespective of their nationality. So, Our companies fulfill the requirements of EU Commission concerning safety, health, environment etc. Also, Our companies choose market-driven strategy to export more largely than before in the field of marketing and logistics.

• The tire
• /
• s.228
• /
• pp.10-18
• /
• 2006

한미FTA 협상이 가속화되면서 자동차산업에 어떠한 영향을 미칠지가 초미의 관심사로 부상하고 있다. 지난 호에 한미FTA가 타이어산업에 미칠 영향에 대해 살펴 보았으나, 이번 호에서는 우리 타이어의 주요 수출시장인 미국 자동차산업의 근황과 글로벌 소싱 현황에 대해서 살펴보도록 한다. 지피지기면 백전불퇴라 했으나, 아직까지도 우리는 미국 자동차산업에 대해 정확히 이해하지 못하고 있는 듯하다. 최근 자동차산업이 한미FTA의 수혜산업중 하나로 평가되면서 노동계와 일부 식자들은 근거없는 논리를 바탕으로 국내 자동차산업의 피해를 주장하고 있다. 자동차산업은 다양한 산업과의 연관성 뿐 아니라 수 많은 전략을 바탕으로 성장하고 있는 역동적인 산업이다. 따라서 한미FTA가 자동차산업에 미칠 영향을 정확히 분석하기 위해서는 관세 및 비관세 철폐의 효과 뿐 아니라 양국 정부의 자동차 산업정책, 산업의 구조, 경쟁의 주체인 기업의 경쟁력 수준 및 전략과 소비자들의 선호도 등을 종합적으로 고려하여 정태적인 영향과 동태적인 영향을 분석할 필요가 있다. 본고에서는 미국 자동차산업의 근황과 글로벌 소싱 현황에 대해 살펴보고 이러한 글로벌 소싱이 한미FTA 자동차분야 협상에 미칠 영향에 대해 살펴 본 후 시사점을 도출해 보기로 한다.

• International Area Studies Review
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.469-493
• /
• 2011

This paper attempts to examine the economic impact of technological barrier to trade(TBT) between Korea and China by using international input-output approach. With the tariff/quota reduced or eliminated since WTO's launch, the interest in TBT as a non-tariff barrier has been increased, and then there have so far been a large number of empirical studies on quantifying its effect in foreign. But still this area of study in Korea is limited in the literature survey. In encouraged in this situation, focusing on bilateral trade between Korea and China, which has been significantly increased in recent years, we have tried to estimates the impact of TBT on their output and employment. We use Asian International Input-Output Table(AIIO) for the year 2000 published by IDE-JETRO, and also use the estimated sectoral TBT provided by Ha et al.(2010). According to the result, there will be generated $3.63 billions values in outputs, and 18.1 millions persons in employments at most. And also we found that there is weak interdependence in sectoral and spatial linkage between two countries.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.1 no.2
• /
• pp.345-364
• /
• 1999

최근 WTO 체제의 출범, 지역주의 확산 등으로 국제통상환경은 변화하고 있으며, 각국의 통상정책에 상당한 영향을 미치고 있다. 특히 미국, EU, 일본의 통상정책은 한국을 비롯한 국채통상환경 전반에 매우 민감한 영향을 주고 있다. 이러한 국제통상환경의 변화에 따라 필요한 것은 주요국의 통상정책 및 제도에 관한 연구이다. 본 연구는 미국, EU, 일본, 한국의 통상정책과 수단의 특징을 비교 분석하였는데, 각국 통상정책의 다양한 특성을 보여주고 있다.

• THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW
• /
• v.69
• /
• pp.617-632
• /
• 2016

After contracting of Korea-China FTA, we have expected the trade volume has mutually been increasing a lot. If we are using this contract, we would make an activation of Korea economy. Especially, Korea youngman has been caught a big chance to make a business in Korea & China. For example, Xian, which is one of center of silk road, has become big strategy area. As we need to focus on this area, we will be expected to indirect influences of consumer's industries like cosmetic, fishery products, food service, eco-friendly items. Recently, the youngman starting up a business has become a trend of kinds of alternative new job. Then, we have to provide practical solution for young man. One of this solution is 'starting up a business'. In this study, I empirically investigated the relation between Korea-China FTA and the youth starting up a business. So, I believe that this study can light up on the direction of effective starting up for making & success a business in China.

• 한국벤처창업학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2022.11a
• /
• pp.217-226
• /
• 2022

그간 농식품부에서는 세계 여러나라와의 협상을 통해 2021년 6월 기준 홍콩, UAE, 캄보디아, 말레이시아로 수출 가능국을 확대한 것은 사실이나 2015년 한우고기 홍콩 첫 수출 이후 타 국가의 수출실적은 전무한 상황이다. 우리나라의 경우 쇠고기 수출 관련 할랄 인프라가 전무한 것이 가장 큰 문제이지만 더불어 할랄 시장에 대한 이해도와 시장상황에 대한 자료가 부족하여 관련 농가 및 업체들이 투자를 꺼려하는 것도 문제점 중 하나로 지적되고 있다. 본 연구팀은 세계 할랄 시장의 큰 축을 담당하고 있는 UAE, 말레이시아 중 할랄 도축관련 비관세 장벽이 비교적 낮은 말레이시아의 시장조사 및 관련기관 인터뷰를 실시하여 말레이시아 시장에서 한우고기의 가격경쟁력을 분석하였다. 조사·분석 결과 한우고기 1++등급의 경우 수출 조건(냉장/냉동) 및 경로(항공/해상)와 상관없이 사태, 앞다리를 제외한 모든 부분육에서 가격경쟁력이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 한우고기 1+등급의 경우 수출 조건(냉장/냉동) 및 경로(항공/해상)와 상관없이 사태, 앞다리를 제외한 모든 부분육에서 가격경쟁력이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 한우고기 1등급의 경우 수출 조건(냉장/냉동) 및 경로(항공/해상)와 상관없이 등심, 채끝 부분육에서 가격경쟁력이 있는 것으로 나타났다.

• THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW
• /
• v.75
• /
• pp.179-198
• /
• 2017

Recently, agricultural exports of Korea have steadily increased. But, no progress is being made at the WTO and DDA negotiations, the FTAs have played a leading role in the formulation of the international trade rules, and countries have been cleverly utilizing non-tariff barriers such as SPS and TBT, there is a growing need to respond to non-tariff barriers aggressively. On the other hand, since the FTA has the potential to activate the global value chain, there is a high need for exporting companies in the domestic agricultural sector to understand the structure of the global value chain in agriculture and actively utilize the global value chain. The non-tariff measures of agricultural commodities major trading partners in the field of domestic agricultural exports were mostly comprised of SPS measures and TBT measures. The non-tariff measures corresponding to inputs and production stages of value chain elements (seeds, seedlings) in the value chain were mainly reported in SPS measures. TBT measures are mainly carried out in selective packaging, storage, processing, distribution, and export sales. It is most important for agricultural export companies to know their position on the value chain and information on non-tariff measures of importing countries in order to actively utilize the global value chain. Since there are non-tariff barriers that are difficult to be solved at the individual enterprise level, active government support of the government is not only important but also actively promoting relevant information to farmers and agricultural exporters. In addition, potential export farmers and prospective export companies will be able to identify TBT and SPS and other non-tariff barriers well in advance, and respond to them in advance. Also, through networking with export related organizations and overseas buyers, It is very important that policy support from the perspective of global value chain is linked effectively.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.14 no.7
• /
• pp.169-175
• /
• 2009

In accordance with the promotional strategy of the 'simultaneously occurring and high-level comprehensive FTA that Korean government made clear in the FTA promotion roadmap in 2003, it has already entered into FTA with 22 countries such as Chile, Singapore, EU, MERCOSUR, ASEAN and the like but is progressing or promoting the negotiation about FTA. It is necessary to make efforts to lift all sorts of non-tariff barriers that put restrictions on the import of China with the promotion of the lowering of customs duties in the negotiation of FTA between Korea and China. It is anticipated that imports will be expanded in the manufacturing field as well as agricultural products with the efforts to improve the business management environment of Korean firms within China. Therefore, it is a very important task to make efforts to prevent the roundabout trade made via China by reinforcing the standard and criterion for the origin of country in the Korea China FTA.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.177-201
• /
• 2015

Korea-China FTA was initialized in 2015. Korea has a high level of dependence on trade for its economic growth, especially to China. Technical Barriers to Trade(TBT) among various non-tariff barriers is becoming increasingly important. Elimination of TBT is one of the key issues in which the South Korean government is interested since technical barriers significantly affect trade between the two countries. MRA has been considered as an effective tool to relieve such technical barriers. Several studies and surveys showed that MRA would mitigate the barriers of import and solve the problems that many companies face in international market. This study tries to seek utilization plan of MRA for Korea-China FTA. It suggests suitable utilization plan of MRA considering the difference of technical regulations between two countries. This paper has value in that it provides specific MRA strategies targeting China while other prior studies have merely analyzed the necessity of MRA.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.13 no.3
• /
• pp.97-118
• /
• 2011

The Korea-Chile FTA talks began in December 1999 and concluded in October 2002, with official endorsement in April 2004. This FTA of a first for Korea, went into effect on April 1 in 2004. The purpose of this study to measure the Chile product evaluation in the Korean consumer after Korea-Chile FTA signed. The major result of article can be summarized as the follows: This paper investigates the determinants of 'product attitude', 'quality recognition', 'price recognition', 'use safety', 'use convenience', and 'design(appearance)'. There are 500 sended samples and 487 returns, 476 of them are analyzed for a entry competitiveness. In the analysis result of the article, The first, multiple regression result shows that the Chile goods evaluation are positively affected by the 'product attitude', 'price recognition', 'use safety', 'use convenience', and 'design(appearance)'. However, The 'quality recognition' factor do not affect in Chile goods evaluation.