• Proceedings of the SAREK Conference
• /
• 2007.06a
• /
• pp.61-61
• /
• 2007

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.16 no.4
• /
• pp.191-225
• /
• 2014

Most of all, this paper analyzes the current situation of EU(European Union) and ascertain EU's economic condition in terms of tariff lines and non-tariff barriers. and the purpose of this article is to find out the problems of EU's tariff lines and non-tariff barriers. Next, We suggest some future direction of export promotion from Korea to EU more largely for our companies. First, this paper describes the characteristics and outline of EU. The EU is a politico-economic union of 28 member states that are primarily located in Europe. The EU traces its origins from the European Coal and Steel Community(ECSC) and the European Economic Community(EEC), formed by the Inner Six countries in 1951 and 1958, respectively. After that, The Maastricht Treaty established the European Union under its current name in 1993. The latest major amendment to the constitutional basis of the EU, the Treaty of Lisbon, came into force in 2009. There are a combined population of over 500 million inhabitants and generated a nominal gross domestic product(GDP) of 16.692 trillion US dollars in EU. The results are as follows ; First of all, In terms of tariff lines and customs duties, Our companies have to know precisely EU's real tariff lines and other customs duties, and such as value added tax and exercise tax, corporate tax regulated by EU commission and EU's 28 members. second, our companies have to confirm EU's non-tariff barriers. such as RoHS, WEEE, REACH. These non-tariff barriers could be hindrances or obstacles to trade with foreign companies in other countries. We perceive all companies exporting to EU are related with these Technical Barriers to Trade irrespective of their nationality. So, Our companies fulfill the requirements of EU Commission concerning safety, health, environment etc. Also, Our companies choose market-driven strategy to export more largely than before in the field of marketing and logistics.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• v.10 no.3
• /
• pp.65-94
• /
• 1988

한국경제(韓國經濟)의 대외의존도(對外依存度), 시장개방(市場開放)의 정도(程度)가 높아감에 따라 상품(商品), 자본(資本), 기술(技術)의 대외거래(對外去來)와 내수시장(內需市場)의 산업조직(産業組織)이 갖는 연계성(連繫性)은 한국(韓國)의 산업조직(産業組織)에 중요한 의미를 갖게 된다. 본고(本稿)에서는 수입(輸入) 등 해외(海外)로부터의 유입(流入)과 수출(輸出) 등 해외(海外)로의 유출(流出)이 산업조직(産業組織)의 주요변수(主要變數)들과 갖는 인과관계(因果關係)를 경험적(經驗的) 산업조직론(産業組織論)의 체계내(體系內)에서 이해하려는 시도로서, 이에 대한 제가설(諸假設)을 전개하며 실증분석(實證分析)을 시도하였다. 동시성(同時性)을 충분히 고려한 연립방정식체계(聯立方程式體系)의 추정결과(推定結果)는 동시성(同時性)을 무시한 경우보다 제가설(諸假設)의 주장에 더욱 근접한 것으로 나타났으며, 대부분의 경우 실증분석(實證分析) 결과(結果)는 가설(假說)을 지지하나 수출(輸出)의 경우에는 상반(相反)된 결과(結果)를 나타내고 있다. 본(本) 연구(硏究)의 분석결과(分析結果)에 의하면 그 동안 한국(韓國)의 수입정책(輸入政策)은 시장성과(市場成果)를 향상(向上)시키는 수단(手段)으로서의 기능보다는 단순히 수출증대(輸出增大)를 위한 수입확대(輸入擴大)의 기능을 해 온 것으로 나타났다. 또한 수입(輸入)에 대한 시장개방(市場開放)에 있어서 비관세장벽(非關稅障壁)의 제감(除減)은 시장성과(市場成果)에 대하여, 관세장벽(關稅障壁)의 인하(引下)는 수입(輸入)의 내수점유율(內需占有率)에 대하여 각각 상대적으로 높은 정(正)의 효과(效果)를 갖고 있는 것으로 나타났는데 이는 정책목표(政策目標)에 따른 정책수단(政策手段)의 선택(選擇)에 대하여 중요한 시사점(示唆點)을 갖는다.

• Proceedings of the SAREK Conference
• /
• 2007.06a
• /
• pp.62-62
• /
• 2007

• International Area Studies Review
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.469-493
• /
• 2011

This paper attempts to examine the economic impact of technological barrier to trade(TBT) between Korea and China by using international input-output approach. With the tariff/quota reduced or eliminated since WTO's launch, the interest in TBT as a non-tariff barrier has been increased, and then there have so far been a large number of empirical studies on quantifying its effect in foreign. But still this area of study in Korea is limited in the literature survey. In encouraged in this situation, focusing on bilateral trade between Korea and China, which has been significantly increased in recent years, we have tried to estimates the impact of TBT on their output and employment. We use Asian International Input-Output Table(AIIO) for the year 2000 published by IDE-JETRO, and also use the estimated sectoral TBT provided by Ha et al.(2010). According to the result, there will be generated $3.63 billions values in outputs, and 18.1 millions persons in employments at most. And also we found that there is weak interdependence in sectoral and spatial linkage between two countries.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.15 no.6
• /
• pp.139-145
• /
• 2010

Since the beginning of 1960s, Korea has been advanced into Africa but we are much too late to extend its business in African Market due to lack of understanding about there. From being the latest Africa is understanding as 'Rising Sun & Post Brics' for Korea. As an advance strategy in Afrcan Market suggest to get international co-operation from ECA, OAU, IFC together with IMF & IBRD etc.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.177-201
• /
• 2015

Korea-China FTA was initialized in 2015. Korea has a high level of dependence on trade for its economic growth, especially to China. Technical Barriers to Trade(TBT) among various non-tariff barriers is becoming increasingly important. Elimination of TBT is one of the key issues in which the South Korean government is interested since technical barriers significantly affect trade between the two countries. MRA has been considered as an effective tool to relieve such technical barriers. Several studies and surveys showed that MRA would mitigate the barriers of import and solve the problems that many companies face in international market. This study tries to seek utilization plan of MRA for Korea-China FTA. It suggests suitable utilization plan of MRA considering the difference of technical regulations between two countries. This paper has value in that it provides specific MRA strategies targeting China while other prior studies have merely analyzed the necessity of MRA.

• Korea Trade Review
• /
• v.43 no.5
• /
• pp.179-201
• /
• 2018

Food labelling rules reflect the interaction of a number of factors such as industry needs for marketing flexibility and minimal regulations, consumer's rights to know what is in the product and public health concerns. However, food labelling rules could apply to international trade as non-tariff barriers so it is necessary to make multilateral harmonization of food labelling rules. For this, GATT XX, SPS, and TBT of the WTO can serve as jurisprudence in agreements. Lgnoring the safety problems of GM food, which is currently a worldwide issue, it is a situation that needs international harmonization of GM food labelling methods, harmonization of technical terms which are used in Korean law, and clear interpretation criteria for GM food labelling methods and contents are vital for sustainable trade in agricultural products. Therefore, this study proposes interpretation criteria through major trade countries' GM food labelling methods and an examination of Korean law. Furthermore, this study proposes international harmonization guidelines for GM food in the future.

• THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW
• /
• v.71
• /
• pp.297-324
• /
• 2016

China not only has the largest amount of rare earth reserves, but it also produces the most rare earth products. However, China lacks appropriate supervision and management systems of its rare earth industry. The Chinese government's inappropriate mechanisms have been cause for reckless development by national rare earth providers characterized by excessive competition, environmental pollution, and smuggling. In response to the problems, China implemented regulatory measures to restructure the rare earth industry. The Chinese central government intensifies its efforts to control the total quantity of rare earth products and tackle environmental pollution. Six leading conglomerates have been selected to promote the Chinese central government's policy. A new environmental guideline has been drawn up to reduce the discharging of wastewater and air pollution substance. Huge transition and a great influence of its policy changes are expected. These policy changes are bound to entail huge transitions, and the policy is expected to have a great influence in the future structure of the rare earth industry. In consideration of these changes, the Korean government, in collaboration with private enterprises needs to take appropriate measures, such as overseas resources development, R&D expansion, tactical stockpiling, professional manpower training and so on.

• The Journal of Aerospace Industry
• /
• s.70
• /
• pp.94-116
• /
• 2008

WTO는 범세계적 글로벌 경쟁상황에서 국가간 무역거래를 제한하고 자원배분을 왜곡하여 결과적으로 세계 후생의 감소를 가져오는 개별 국가들의 관세 및 각종 비관세장벽, 그리고 자원의 효율적 배분을 왜곡하는 각국 정부의 보조금 정책 시정을 위해 창설되었다. 항공기산업에 있어서 보조금 논쟁의 특징은 주로 선-선진국간 분쟁에 국한된다는 점에서 기존의 WTO에서 많은 갈등을 빚고 있는 선-후진국간의 분쟁과는 큰 차이가 있다. 한국이 주도적으로 대규모 개발사업을 추진하면서 정부보조금을 지급할 경우에는 장기적으로 보조금 분쟁에 휘말릴 가능성이 있다. 그러나 미국/유럽간 쌍무협정 체결 내용에서 보듯이 개발보조금 지급 비중이 전체 개발비의 33%이상이 되지 않을 경우는 큰 문제가 없을 것으로 예상되며, 추가적 지원이 필요할 경우에는 직접적 개발비 보다는 관련 지 원인프라 지원을 통해 특정성 문제를 회피할 필요가 있다. 또한 한국은 아직 WTO 민간 항공기 협정 미가입 상태이기 때문에 WTO로부터 당장 규제대상은 아니다. 실제로 WTO 회원 가입 절차는 WTO로부터 요청 후 국내 검토를 거쳐 예비회원가입(2년 소요)-정회원의 절차를 거치게 된다. 또한 보조금 지급에 의한 경쟁자의 산업 피해가 직접적으로 드러날 때까지는 더 많은 시간이 소요되기 때문에 실제로 WTO 제재를 받기까지는 상당한 시간을 확보할 수 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 WTO 회원이 되면 항공기산업의 육성에 많은 제약이 따르므로 사전적으로 충분한 정부 지원을 통해 조속히 국제경쟁력을 키우는 전략이 필요한 것으로 보인다.