• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 2009.03a
• /
• pp.87-87
• /
• 2009

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.5 no.2
• /
• pp.135-139
• /
• 2001

Purpose : Repair of the posterior capsule tear at the time of the operation for the chronic postero-lateral or postero-medial rotary instability has not been reported. We describe the arthroscopic repair of the posterior capsule tear using the posterior trans-septal portal. Method : After conducting basic arthroscopic examination of the knee, postero-medial and postero-lateral portals are secure to make the posterior trans-septal portal, through which the postero-medial and postero-lateral capsule tears are repaired using the suture hook under the arthroscopic guidance. Conclusion : When arthroscopic reconstruction of PCL insufficiency or postero-lateral rotaty instability that accompanies postero-medial or postero-lateral capsular tears. rising the posterior traits-septal portal could ensure better visualization of the capsule and a subsequent more accurate repair of the capsule. Since it significantly lessened instability, it could contribute to an achievement of successful clinical results.

• Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society
• /
• v.26 no.1
• /
• pp.16-21
• /
• 2022

When an ankle lateral malleolar fracture is accompanied by a deltoid ligament rupture without a medial malleolar fracture, such an injury is called a bimalleolar equivalent fracture. This means that even if there is no bony injury on the medial side, there may be functional instability of the ankle joint due to damage to the deltoid ligament. Manual or gravity external rotational stress radiography is used to differentiate an ankle bimalleolar equivalent fracture from an isolated lateral malleolar fracture. If the medial joint gap is widened on the stress radiography, the deltoid ligament injury can be diagnosed, and surgical treatment for fibula fractures is recommended. After open reduction of the fibula fracture (with syndesmotic fixation if needed), a decision on the repair of the deltoid ligament is taken depending on the surgeons' preference and intraoperative findings. The deltoid ligament repair is performed by inserting a suture anchor (or anchors) in the medial malleolus and fixing the deep and superficial deltoid ligaments to the medial malleolus. The only randomized study to evaluate the utility of deltoid ligament sutures in ankle fractures did not support the deltoid ligament suture, but the study itself had many limitations. An appropriately powered, randomized, controlled trial of the deltoid ligament repair with both patient-reported outcome and radiographic outcome evaluation is needed in the future.

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.24-28
• /
• 2013

Purpose: All-inside meniscal repair using FasT-Fix (Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Andover, Massachusetts, USA) is a popular method for the meniscal tear. However, there was no report after all-inside repair using FasT-Fix for the meniscal tear in Korea. Therefore, the purpose of this retrospective study was to report clinical outcomes after all-inside meniscal repair using FasT-Fix. Materials and Methods: 25 consecutive patients underwent meniscal repairs using FasT-Fix for tears of the posterior horn of the medial or lateral menisci combined with hamstring anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions. Postoperative evaluations included Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale. Using clinical criteria, a repaired meniscus was considered healed if there was no effusion or joint line tenderness, negative McMurray test, and no sense of giving way. Results: The average follow-up was 47.9 months (range, 40 to 61 months). At follow-up, the mean Lysholm score was 91.8 and the mean Tegner activity scale was 5.6. According to clinical criteria, 20 (80%) menisci was healed, and 5 (20%) failed. Conclusion: All-inside meniscal repair using FasT-Fix showed satisfactory results in patients with hamstring ACL reconstructions.

• The Academic Congress of Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society
• /
• 2009.03a
• /
• pp.186-186
• /
• 2009

• Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
• /
• v.52 no.1
• /
• pp.97-102
• /
• 2017

The incidence of septic arthritis after knee arthroscopy surgery has rarely been reported in approximately 0.04% to 3.4%. Moreover, septic arthritis after arthroscopic meniscal repair is more rare. There have been some reported cases, but in Korea, it has not been reported thus far. Herein, we report two cases of septic arthritis after arthroscopic meniscal repair with review of literature.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.114-120
• /
• 2012

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the usefulness and the stability of the superficial medial collateral ligament (MCL) release in posterior medial meniscus root repair. Materials and Methods: We compared 20 patients who underwent posterior medial meniscus root repair with superficial MCL preserved (PM) and 32 patients who underwent posterior medial meniscus root repair combined with superficial MCL release (RM) from April 2006 to September 2010. We excluded the patients combined with other surgery. To evaluate the postoperative valgus instability in RM group, we examined direct tenderness on MCL insertion, the subjective feeling of instability and valgus stress test at 3 months and 1 year follow-up. We compared the tourniquet time between PM group and RM group, and the clinical results were assessed by Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) for the usefulness. Results: All patients had no clinically significant complication related to the superficial MCL release. Three months and 1 year follow-up, there were no positive tenderness test, no subjective symptoms and no significant increase of valgus instability although 5 patients examined grade I valgus instability. The mean tourniquet time was $41.3{\pm}12.7$ minutes in RM group and $53.5{\pm}13.6$ minutes in PM group. There was a significant difference in the tourniquet time between the two groups (P<0.05). Average Lysholm score was $56.8{\pm}5.5$ (range, 44-70) preoperatively and $85.1{\pm}5.8$ (range, 77-94) postoperatively in PM group, and was $56.2{\pm}5.4$ (range, 45-67) preoperatively and $87.4{\pm}3.9$ (range, 82-95) postoperatively in RM group (P<0.001). No significant difference of Lysholm score was found in both groups (P<0.05). Average IKDC scores was $42.6{\pm}3.9$ (range, 30-53) preoperatively and $77.2{\pm}6.3$ (range, 68-92) postoperatively in PM group, and was $42.7{\pm}5.7$ (range, 30-53) preoperatively and $89.6{\pm}2.9$ (range, 84-95) postoperatively in RM group (P<0.05). There was also no significant difference of IKDC score in both groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: The superficial MCL release in posterior medial meniscus root repair is useful to gain a wide surgical field and reduces the tourniquet time and does not lead to postoperative valgus instability. It can be considered clinically useful and safe procedure in medial meniscus posterior root repair.

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.9 no.1
• /
• pp.35-40
• /
• 2010

Purpose: To compare the outcome of patients who underwent rotator cuff repair using all-arthroscopic mini-open repair techniques. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 44 patients who underwent either arthroscopic (group I) or mini-open (group II) rotator cuff repair. 23 patients underwent an arthroscopic repair and 21 patients had a mini-open repair. The mean age was 50.4 years in the arthroscopic group and 56.7 years in the mini-open group. The outcomes for the 2 groups were evaluated using ROM, VAS, ASES, UCLA scale. Statistical analysis was performed using correlations, T-test, Paired T-test. The mean follow-up period in the arthroscopic and mini-open groups were 24.1months and 26.1months, respectively. Results: The group I (arthroscopic group) had 2 small-sized tears, 10 medium sized tears, and 11 large sized tears (3~5 cm). The group II (mini-open group) had 1 small sized tears, 8 medium sized tears, and 12 large sized tears. The mean cuff tear size of the group I and Group II were 3.8 cm and 4.2 cm, respectively. At last follow-up periods, ROM and functional scores were improved. In the group I and group II, there were no significant difference in ROM, VAS, ASES, UCLA score. Conclusion: The size of the tear did not produce different results at arthroscopic repair group but larger tear size was associated with a worse outcome in mini-open group. There were no significant clinical results between the arthroscopic and mini-open group.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.237-243
• /
• 2010

Purpose: In arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, the crucial step is secure fixation of Anchor to bone. However, osteoporosis of the tuberosity is frequently encountered in old patients, and can cause insecure fixation of anchors. The Aim of our study was to introduce a technique for anchor hole augmentation with bone cement when fixation failure of an anchor occurs, and to investigate the outcome. Materials and methods: Among 223 rotator cuff repairs performed between 2005 and 2009, anchor hole augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate was performed in 15 cases (all females; mean age of 65 years: range 49~77). Bone cement was injected into the anchor hole in a thick fluid state and the procedure was repeated to make a pot-like cement mantle. The anchor was inserted into the cement mantle while the cement hardened. The outcome was investigated, on average, at 16 months (6~32). Results: Radiographs showed cystic changes of the tuberosity. On follow-up radiographs and MRI, a change in the cement mantle was not noted. The final average UCLA score was 31 (28~35); 6 had excellent, 8 good and 1 fair results (p=0.008). Age-sex matched Constants score was 90 (74~98) (p=0.008). Conclusion: Anchor hole augmentation with bone cement is useful when fixation failure of an anchor is encountered due to bone atrophy. Anchor hole augmentation with bone cement does not negatively influence the outcome.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.8-12
• /
• 2006

회전근 개 파열이 왜 통증을 일으키며 어떤 경우 통증을 일으키는가에 대해 아직도 모르는 부분이 많다. 그러나 생 역학적으로 회전근 개 질환을 이해하고 접근하면 순리적으로 풀어져 나가는 부분도 많다. 회전근 개가 파열되었어도 통증이 미약하다면 수술보다는 적극적인 보존적 치료가 원칙이다. 만약 수술을 하는 경우 고식적인 방법으로 충분한 경험을 쌓은 후 관절경술을 시도하여야 한다. 물론 최근 관절경술로 파열된 회전근 개를 봉합하여 주는 것이 선호되고 있으며 치료 결과 역시 관절경술이 더 좋을 수는 있으나 불안정성과 마찬가지로 전례에서 가능한 것도 아니고 만족한 결과를 모든 정형외과 의사가 공히 얻는 것은 아니다. 특히 회전근 개 봉합술은 고도의 관절경술 수기가 요구되는 것이므로 충분한 연마가 요구된다.