• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2021.11a
• /
• pp.673-676
• /
• 2021

본 연구에서는 Google Dialogflow 자연어 처리 엔진(NLP 엔진), 정보수집(크롤링), iOS 챗봇 애플리케이션을 통해 정부 및 지자체 혜택 및 정보 추천 서비스를 제공하는 챗봇 구현을 제안한다. 해당 챗봇은 디지털 기기 사용이 능숙하지 않은 중, 장년층 사용자가 쉽게 이용할 수 있도록 접근성을 높이고, 정부 및 지자체에서 제공하는 다양한 혜택 및 정보의 불균형과 격차의 해소를 목적으로, 사용자가 선택한 지역에 따른 혜택·복지·소식 정보를 제공 및 추천한다. 이 과정을 통해 사용자는 자신이 원하는 분야의 정부 및 지자체의 적절한 복지 정보를 추천 받을 수 있다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2016.05a
• /
• pp.232-234
• /
• 2016

선원 직업 기피현상 및 선원복지혜택과 관련하여 한국선원복지고용센터에서 운영중인 사업과 추진해야 할 사업의 우선순위를 AHP기법을 이용하여 분석하고, 최우선적으로 개선방안을 제시하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2022.05a
• /
• pp.74-74
• /
• 2022

국민의 삶의 질을 개선하는 문제가 경제정책의 주요 의제로 떠오르면서 성장률 자체보다는 성장의 질을 개선하자는 논의는 이미 제기된지 오래이다. 물관리 분야에서도 상·하수도 보급률이100%에 가까운 수준으로 인프라는 완성단계에 있다고 해도 과언은 아니다. 그러나 홍수, 가뭄, 수질 오염 등 다양한 물 관련 사고가 빈번하게 발생하고 있으며, 지자체마다 피해의 대응수준도 차이가 있다. 물복지를 "모든 국민이 언제나 물이 제공하는 혜택을 받고 보다 나은 삶의 질을 보장 받는 것"으로 정의하였을 때 지자체마다 물복지 인프라 수준도 다르고 지역 주민이 느끼는 물복지 수준도 다를 것이다. 물복지 수준 향상을 위해서는 지역 주민이 체감하고 있는 물복지 수준에 대해서 조사하고 정책에 대한 시민들의 수요 조사를 통해 물복지 정책을 수립할 필요가 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 물관리 및 물복지 정책에 대한 우리나라 국민의 인식 수준을 파악하기 위해 2021년 10월 2천명을 대상으로 온라인 설문조사를 수행하였다. 특히 지역에 따른 물복지 혜택의 격차를 조사하기 위하여 거주 지역에 대한 물이용의 인식 수준을 함께 질문하여 물복지 지수 분석 결과와 국민의 인식 간의 격차를 확인하였다. 본 연구 결과를 통하여 대국민 인식을 반영한 물 정책 우선순위를 파악함으로써 최적 정책 시행 등 향후 물정책 방안 수립에 활용할 수 있다.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.42 no.6
• /
• pp.60-71
• /
• 2014

In this study, on the assumption that the urban park originally is imbued with a public welfare ideology, said public welfare ideology and its characteristics were attended to among the various social roles that the urban park currently fulfills. Aspects of welfare meaning in urban parks were attempted to be identified with the former history of urban parks and the movements of the connections between modern parks and welfare territories. The ideologies, benefits and practices regarding the welfare role that the urban park has played from the past to the present were examined and the backgrounds and contexts within which the welfare ideologies have been expressed in the urban park were examined. In order to examine the implicated public welfare ideologies of the urban park, case studies were conducted to identify how they are expressed and practiced in the present times and the facilitation of these parks and public welfare both in the U.S. and the South Korea. The study results of the cases show that expressions of public welfare in urban parks are composed of more specific and visible programs and strategies in the present times, which are different from the simple proclamatory ways in the past. Particularly, in order to visibly practice a public welfare ideology, many-sided integrated designs are conducted along with various public welfare institutions and programs inside and outside of the urban park. The conclusions from this study are as follows. First, the urban park plays a role as a space to realize public welfare ideology, to create welfare benefits and to realize social welfare. Modern urban parks are used as an indicator to measure the actual conditions of social welfare and are a social environmental commodity that can offer universal benefits to urban residents. Second, many-sided integrated designs are tried along with various public welfare institutions at urban parks, which visibly practice public welfare ideologies in the present. In addition, public welfare institutions greatly influence the consistent development of the resources in the urban park. Third, if the detailed utilization of the regional facilities infrastructure could be brought along with multidimensional approaches about the resources in the urban park, it could be much closer to the lives of residents and could secure a space for increasing resident quality of life.

• 한국사회정책
• /
• v.23 no.1
• /
• pp.125-150
• /
• 2016

This study was carried out to empirically analyze the hypothesis that the impact of the welfare status on the welfare attitudes is moderated by each individual's level of confidence in government. To do this, this study focused on the welfare status known as the significant predictors of welfare attitudes and measured the welfare status as a gap between 'welfare contribute' and 'welfare benefit' in a single dimension, which is defined as 'material sacrifice'. Also, this study examined the main effect of material sacrifice and trust in government on the welfare attitudes and moderating effect of trust in government on relationship between material sacrifice and welfare attitudes. This study was performed with secondary data from 8th year of "2013 Korea Welfare Panel Study". Hypothesis of this study were verified using hierarchical multiple regression analysis. The major findings of this study are summarized as follow. 'Material sacrifice' was found to be negatively associated with the welfare attitudes. However, as the confidence in which social policies will be carried out competently by government increases, it was confirmed that the negative effect of material sacrifice on the welfare attitudes was moderated. It suggests that self-material interests associated with welfare could be moderated by beliefs and expectations about the government's functions, which means that expanding the reliance on the social policy is an important task in order to lead a social consensus for the welfare expansion.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.43 no.1
• /
• pp.69-81
• /
• 2015

Under the premise that parks have been a performing field of welfare ideology that benefits the citizen from the past, the present study began with a basic question on what substance a park has and how it has worked. Therefore, this study tried to find out the theoretic background that can explain the roles of a park as an instrument for welfare, of which topic is currently being discussed, and examine how the ideology in the debate regarding welfare characteristics of parks are differentiated from those of social welfare. In addition, this study divided the process of development of parks defined by Galen Cranz in an attempt to view how welfare benefits offered by parks have changed in their development and looked into the roles and types of welfare functions that parks provided to the citizens under a certain social situation by period. Furthermore, the characteristics and development of the ideology underlying a welfare park were examined by function and element in its progression. The results of this study are as follows. The functions that parks have performed so far can be classified into three categories. First, they have a remedial function. Parks have given direct services to 'the socially disadvantaged' such as relief, fostering, and rehabilitation. Second, parks have played a preventive function. They aim to reinforce the functions of individual, family, group, and community. Third, they have exerted a developmental function. They function to promote change of society in a way for it to contribute to social development. Looking into the roles and functions of parks from the perspective of their beneficiary class and benefits, the following were discovered. First, the beneficiaries of welfare characteristics in parks have expanded to the general public from the poor class, and the benefits of parks have spread into the public including the underprivileged in a real sense. Second, the significance of welfare characteristics in parks has also changed from literal benefits to caring for basic human rights. Third, the purpose of welfare characteristics in parks has changed from providing minimal conditions to optimal conditions. At its beginning, the ideology of welfare in parks remained ideal, confining itself to their idealistic characteristics; but as time went on, they created several social benefits in response to various social demands, developing into a field where welfare ideology manifests and is realized in an active manner. Furthermore, it was witnessed that the parks and welfare of the present times are standing at the point of contact for participation and universal well-being. The present study reconsidered the meaning and value of parks from perspective of them as a provider of welfare benefits as well as examined how the welfare ideology of parks is connected to practice. By doing so, this study discovered the various roles, values, and ideology that parks should bear in the future. Therefore, this study is expected to be a good example for future research related to the topic.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2018.11a
• /
• pp.301-303
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 사회적 관광과 복지관광에 대한 선행연구 검토를 통해 해양휴양복지에 대한 개념을 정립하는 한편 국외 해양휴양복지사례 및 국내 문화 관광복지 정책 및 산림휴양복지 정책, 국내 해양휴양관광 실태 분석을 통해 국내 해양휴양복지 발전 여건을 파악했다. 우리나라 국민들은 해양을 통한 휴식 및 휴양에 대한 수요가 높으며 만족도 또한 높아 향후 해양휴양복지 서비스에 대한 수요 또한 높을 것으로 전망된다. 다만 해양관광 관련 정책 중 복지와 관련된 사항은 어업인, 연안 어촌에 집중해 추진되어 왔으며, 전 국민이 해양을 통해 보편적으로 누릴 수 있는 복지 서비스 측면에서는 다루어지지 않았다. 향후 우리나라 해양휴양복지 정책은 해양치유 및 해양휴양 자원을 발굴하고 관련 프로그램을 개발하는 한편, 해양치유를 통한 해양휴양복지 서비스를 누릴 수 있는 공간을 조성하고, 전국민이 해양휴양복지 혜택을 받을 수 있는 법제도적인 기반을 마련해야 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2013.11a
• /
• pp.402-405
• /
• 2013

정부 3.0의 패러다임에 맞추어 사회복지서비스의 복지정책과 수요는 폭발적으로 증가할 것이다. 이에 반해 현장에서 정책을 실질적으로 집행 할 수 있는 인력인 사회복지사 등의 부족으로 실제 국민들에게 혜택이 제대로 돌아가지 못하고 있는 실정이다. 이러한 문제점을 최소화하기 위해서 복지정책의 수정과 함께 사회복지전달체계의 시스템화는 필수적이라고 할 수 있다. 민 관의 복지서비스 지원 시스템과 흩어져 있던 복지자원을 통합하고 시민과 이웃이 모두 참여 할 수 있는 복지서비스 지워 시스템의 구축은 미래 복지서비스의 새로운 방향을 제시할 것이다. 본 논문은 사각지대에 놓인 복지수요자의 발굴이 용이하고 민 관 복지서비스를 통합해서 제공할 수 있는 새로운 사회복지전달체계 시스템을 설계하고 구현하였다.

• 주택과사람들
• /
• s.194
• /
• pp.56-61
• /
• 2006

광대한 국토에 펼쳐진 대자연을 만끽할 수 있는 나라, 호주, 풍부한 자연의 환경의 혜택을 누릴 수 있는 호주는 생활 환경이 쾌적하고 여러 나라 사람들이 모여 사는 세계적인 도시다. 사회복지제도도 잘돼 있어 국내 이민자들의 관심을 모으는 호주 부동산 시장에 대해 살펴보았다.

• 한국사회정책
• /
• v.25 no.4
• /
• pp.3-38
• /
• 2018

This study aims to analyse the redistributive impact of the welfare state growth in Korea after 2000s and establish whether there are people excluded from the benefits of the growth. The growth of the Korean welfare state has been achieved by universalizing welfare benefits under the social insurance-centered institutions which are the legacies of the productivist/developmental welfare regime. When it comes to redistribution impacts, the welfare state growth improved inequality among old age populations to a certain degree due to the introduction of the Basic Pension. On the other hand, welfare benefits for the working poor population has hardly been improved in spite of the growing welfare state. It can be said, therefore, that low-income working-age populations have been excluded from the growth of Korean welfare state. These groups are mostly in middle-old age, unemployed or precariously employed and half of them were female householders. The exclusion of these groups from the Korean welfare state shows that the growth of the Korean welfare state was unbalanced. To include the excluded into the Korean welfare state, it is necessary to increase non-insurance social provisions, extend the range of application of the social insurances, integrate income protection, employment service, and vocational training for the working poor, and combine universal and targeted welfare benefits.