• Title/Summary/Keyword: 복강경하 담낭절제술

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.015 seconds

Clinical Study Comparing the Skin Antiseptics of Povidone-iodine and Chlorhexidine-ethanol on Port Site (투관침 부위에 적용하는 포비돈 아이오딘과 클로르헥시딘-에탄올의 소독제 효과 연구)

  • Kang, Min Jung
    • Journal of Convergence for Information Technology
    • /
    • v.10 no.10
    • /
    • pp.80-87
    • /
    • 2020
  • The purpose of this study was to compare in antiseptic effect between povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine-ethanol for laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the port site. A total of 46 patients admitted to surgery at one university hospital in Seoul were included in the study. A study group was randomly assigned using a random number table. The antiseptic effect was evaluated and compared to povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine-ethanol by using a culture and identification of bacteria, measurement of the number of bacteria (CFU/ml) and incidence of surgical site infection. Our results show that povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine-ethanol have no statistically significant difference in the incidence rate of bacteria after 3 minutes of disinfection and before removal of the trocar and in the number of bacteria and the incidence of surgical site infection. Thus, in order to select an efficient and appropriate skin antiseptics, we suggest that it is necessary to consider not only the disinfectant effect but also cost and convenience. In this research, our results about effect and usage of skin antiseptics can be used as basic data and educational resource, and this is expected to improve comprehension of skin antiseptics.

The Comparison of the Effects of Two Anaesthetic Techniques on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (복강경하 담낭절제술환자에서의 마취방법에 따른 수술 후 오심과 구토의 비교)

  • Seo, Yun Ju;Park, Hyo Seon;Yang, In Sun
    • Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research
    • /
    • v.15 no.2
    • /
    • pp.67-75
    • /
    • 2009
  • Purpose: Postoperative nausea and vomiting(PONV) is a common problem after general anesthesia. The aim of this prospective, double-blind randomized study was to compare the effect of Propofol-Remifentanil vs. Sevoflurane inhalational anesthetics on PONV after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Forty patients (ASA physical status 1, 2) scheduled for elective surgery participated in the study. Twenty of them received total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA group) with Propofol-Remifentanil, and the rest were given Sevoflurane inhalational anesthetics (inhalation group). The TIVA group was induced with Propofol 5mcg/ml and Remifentanil 3~4mcg/ml. The anesthesia was maintained with the continuous infusion of Propofol 2~3mcg/ml and Remifentanil 2~3mcg/ml IV. The inhalation group was induced with Pentotal Sodium 5mg/kg and 3~4mcg/kg/hr IV Remifentanil. Maintenance was obtained with 1.5~2.0 vol% Sevoflurane. Results: The subjects in TIVA group reported less PONV than those in Sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia group. Conclusion: Propofol-Remifentanil anesthesia (TIVA group) was considered a satisfactory anesthetic technique in reducing PONV in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.