• Title/Summary/Keyword: 보강된 복합적층 판넬

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

Postbuckling Analysis of laminated composite-stringer stiffened-Curved panels Loaded in Local compression. (국부 압축력을 받는 스트링거 보강 복합적층 만곡 판넬의 좌굴후 거동해석)

  • 김조권
    • Composites Research
    • /
    • v.13 no.1
    • /
    • pp.25-32
    • /
    • 2000
  • In this paper, postbuckling behavior of laminated composite-stringer stiffened-curved panels loaded in local compression is analyzed using the finite element program developed. Postbuckling Analysis is performed in dividing the panel behavior into three basic parts. The eight node degenerated shell element is used in modelling both panel and stiffeners, and the updated Lagrangian description method based on the 2nd Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor and the Green strain tensor is used for the nonlinear finite element formulation. The progressive failure analysis is adopted in order to grasp the failure characteristics. The postbuckling experiment of the laminated composite-stiffened-curved panel had been done to verify the finite element analysis. The buckling load and the postbuckling ultimate load are compared in parametric study.

  • PDF

Buckling and Postbuckling Behavior of Stiffened Laminated Composite Panels (보강된 복합적층 판넬의 좌굴 및 좌굴후 거동 연구)

  • Lee, In-Cheol;Gyeong, U-Min;Gong, Cheol-Won;Hong, Chang-Seon;Kim, Cheon-Gon
    • Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A
    • /
    • v.20 no.10
    • /
    • pp.3199-3210
    • /
    • 1996
  • The buckling and postbuckling behaviors were sutdied analytically and experimentally for stiffened laminated composite panels under compression loading. The panels with I-, blade, -and hat-shapeed stiffeners were investigated. In the analysis, the stiffened panels were anlyzed using the nonlinear finite element method combined with an improved arc-length method. The progressive failure analysis was done by adopting the maximum stress criterion and complete unloading failure model. The effects of the fiber angles were investigated on the buckling and postbuckling behaviors. In the experiment, the web and the lower cap of each stiffener were formed by the continuous lay-up of the skin for cocuring the stiffened panels. Therefore, the separation between stiffener and skin was not found in the junction part even after postbuckling ultimate load and the stiffened panels had excellent postbuckling load carrying capacity. A shadow moire thchnique was used to monitor the out-of-plane deformations of the panels. The piezoelectric films were attached to the panels to get the failure characteristics of the panel. The analytical results on the buckling load, postbuckling ultimate load, and failure pattern showed good agreement with the experimental results.

Mechanical Characteristics of 3-dimensional Woven Composite Stiffened Panel (3차원으로 직조된 복합재 보강 패널의 기계적 특성 연구)

  • Jeong, Jae-Hyeong;Hong, So-Mang;Byun, Joon-Hyung;Nam, Young-Woo;Kweon, Jin-Hwe
    • Composites Research
    • /
    • v.35 no.4
    • /
    • pp.269-276
    • /
    • 2022
  • In this paper, a composite stiffened panel was fabricated using a three-dimensional weaving method that can reduce the risk of delamination, and mechanical properties such as buckling load and natural frequency were investigated. The preform of the stringer and skin of the stiffened panel were fabricated in one piece using T800 grade carbon fiber and then, resin (EP2400) was injected into the preform. The compression test and natural frequency measurement were performed for the stiffened panel, and the results were compared with the finite element analyses. In order to compare the performance of 3D weaving structures, the stiffened panels with the same configuration were fabricated using UD and 2D plain weave (fabric) prepregs. Compared to the tested buckling load of the 3D woven panel, the buckling loads of the stiffened panels of UD prepreg and 2D plain weave exhibited +20% and -3% differences, respectively. From this study, it was confirmed that the buckling load of the stiffened panel manufactured by 3D weaving method was lower than that of the UD prepreg panel, but showed a slightly higher value than that of the 2D plain weave panel.