• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제13권7호
• /
• pp.373-380
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 테니스 한손과 양손 백핸드 스트로크 동작에서 하지관절 움직임의 차이를 확인하여 유형별 특성을 밝히는데 그 목적이 있으며 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 볼의 속도를 결정하는 중요한 요인인 라켓헤드의 합성 속도는 양손 백핸드 스트로크 동작이 한손보다 빠른 속도를 나타냈다. 양손 백핸드 스트로크는 하체의 움직임을 최소화시키고 몸통 회전을 통한 스트로크를 하는 반면 한손 백핸드 스트로크는 몸통을 이용한 스트로크를 하기 보다는 공을 쫓아가듯이 스트로크 하는 것으로 나타났다. 슬관절의 신전모멘트는 한손 백핸드 스트로크가 큰 것으로 나타났지만, 내번모멘트와 회내모멘트 그리고 굴곡모멘트는 양손 스트로크에서 크게 나타났다. 고관절의 경우 신전, 내번, 회내 모멘트가 양손 백핸드 스트로크가 한손 보다 모두 큰 것으로 나타났는데 특히 내번모멘트의 경우 큰 차이를 나타난 반면, 외번모멘트는 한손 백핸드 스트로크가 큰 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국운동역학회지
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.151-159
• /
• 2008

본 연구는 2008 베이징 장애인 올림픽에 참가하는 국가대표 휠체어 탁구 선수들 중 대표적인 절단장애 선수와 척수장애 선수의 스트로크를 대상으로 운동학적 비교분석을 실시하였다. 실재와 같은 경기상황을 설정하여 모든 경기 상황에서의 스트로크를 수집하였다. 그중 대표적인 포핸드 스트로크 세 개의 동작과 백핸드 스트로크 세 개의 동작을 추출하였다. 9대의 적외선 카메라를 이용하여 수집한 자료는 LabVIEW7.0 그래픽 프로그램을 이용한 운동학적 분석에 의하여 각운동으로 나타내었다. 그 결과 척수장애 선수의 포핸드 스트로크에서는 몸통의 회전이 하위분절인 어깨의 회전과 팔꿈치의 굴곡신전과 거의 동시에 이루어지고 있었다. 백핸드 스트로크는 몸통의 회전, 어깨의 굴곡-신전, 그리고 팔꿈치의 굴곡-신전이 날아오는 공의 연장선상에서 일정한 형태로 정렬되어 있었고 공을 치기위한 백스윙은 어깨의 회전을 이용해 만들고 있었다. 절단장애 선수의 포핸드 스트로크는 팔의 외측회전으로 백스윙과 내측회전으로 만들어지는 회전을 이용하여 스트로크 하고 있었다. 백핸드 스트로크는 어깨의 회전과 허리의 회전에 있어 내측회전이 백스윙을 만들고 백스윙 후 공을 향한 큰 폭의 외측회전으로 임팩트를 이루고 있었다.

• 한국운동역학회지
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.51-59
• /
• 2008

본 연구는 국가대표 절단장애 휠체어 탁구선수를 대상으로 절단장애 휠체어 탁구의 일반적 스트로크 운동형태를 알아보기 위해 실행되었다. 연구대상은 절단장애 1명을 선발하여 10회에 걸쳐 스트로크 하는 영상을 수집하였다. 그 중 대상자와 코치가 지정하는 3개의 영상을 연구대상으로 정하였다. 스트로크 하는 팔의 팔꿈치의 굴곡신전, 어깨의 굴곡신전, 어깨의 회전, 그리고 허리의 회전을 분석하였다. 포핸드 스트로크는 일반적으로 치는 듯한 동작을 나타낼 것으로 예상했으나 오른팔의 외측회전으로 만들어진 백스윙과 내측회전으로 만들어지는 회전에 의지하여 스트로크하고 있었다. 백핸드 스트로크는 예상대로 기시부인 몸통이 스트로크에 관여하지 않고 말초부인 오른팔이 내측회전 백스윙을 이루고 외측회전으로 임팩트를 이루는 미는 듯한 동작을 나타내고 있었다. 포핸드 스트로크 일반적인 스윙동작을 나타내는 다중분절시스템의 원리에 의해 치는 듯한 동작을 보일 것으로 예상했지만 절단장애인인 대상자는 기시부와 말초부로 이어지는 연결구조가 명확하게 나타나지 않았다. 다만 어깨의 회전폭이 스트로크 성공여부를 결정지었다.

• 한국운동역학회지
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.85-95
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relations between the segments of the body, the three dimensional anatomical angle during One Hand Backhand Stroke and Two Hand Backhand in tennis. For the movement analysis three dimensional cinematographical method(APAS) was used and for the calculation of the kinematic variables a self developed program was used with the LabVIEW 6.1 graphical programming(Johnson, 1999) program. By using Eular's equations the three dimensional anatomical Cardan angles of the joint and racket head direction were defined. 1. In three dimensional maximum linear velocity of racket head the X axis and Y axis(horizontal direction) showed $-11.04{\pm}2.69m/sec$, $-9.31{\pm}0.49m/sec$ before impact, the z axis(vertical direction) maximum linear velocity of racket head did not show at impact but after impact this will resulted influence upon hitting ball. It could be suggest that Y axis velocity of racket head influence on ball direction and z axis velocity influence on ball spin after impact. The stance distance between right foot and left foot was mean $75.4{\pm}5.86cm$ during one hand backhand stroke and $72.6{\pm}4.67cm$ during two hand backhand stroke. 2. The three dimensional anatomical angular displacement of trunk in interna rotation-external rotation showed most important role in backhand stroke. and is follwed by flexion-extension. the three dimensional anatomical angular displacement of trunk did not show significant difference between one hand backhand stroke and two hand backhand stroke but the three dimensional anatomical angular displacement of trunk was bigger than one hand backhand stroke. 3. while backhand stroke, the flexion-extension and adduction-abduction of right shoulder joint showed significant different between one hand backhand stroke and two hand backhand stroke. the three dimensional anatomical angular displacement of right shoulder joint showed more flex and abduct in one hand backhand stroke. 4. The three dimensional anatomical angular displacement of left shoulder showed flexion, adduction, and external rotation at impact. after impact, The angular displacement as adduction-abduction of left shoulder changed motion direction as abduction. angular displacement of left shoulder as flexion-extension showed bigger than the right shoulder.

• 한국운동역학회지
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.139-148
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study was to comparatively analyze the kinematic variables between the squash backhand and racquetball backhand strokes through three-dimensional cinematography. Three expert racquetball players and three expert squash players were involved in the data gathering process. The horizontal, vertical and lateral displacement of racket and trunk segment, intersegmental angular velocity of the wrist, elbow and shoulder joints, and the linear velocity of the racket were descriptively analyzed, and the followings were concluded. The racket of the squash backhand stroke showed an 'U' shaped movement where the racket moved rapidly downward and moved forward to make an impact and followed through to a front-top finish, while the racket of racquetball backhand stroke showed an 'O' shaped movement where the racket showed circular movement through the rear and bottom positions for the impact, and showed rotation through the lower-front and upper front to a upper-rear-ward finish during the follow-through. The peak velocity of racket was found before the impact point in the squash backhand stroke and at the impact point in the racquetball backhand stroke. For the final conclusion, for the squash backhand stoke, instructors might be better to make the racket move downward to make highest velocity before the impact and finished short follow-through, while for the racquetball backhand stroke, to make the racket move forward to make highest velocity at the impact and finished rather long follow-through.

• 한국운동역학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.39-46
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to examine differences between players who bend the left elbow and those who stretch it during the forward swing from BST to BC in a 2-handed backhand stroke among outstanding high school tennis players, and to assess the detailed 3D rotational kinematic characteristics of the shoulder and the hip. Statistically significant differences were observed between groups in the longitudinal axis rotation angle of the shoulder and the angle between the shoulder and the arm at BST, and in the side to side movement of the shoulder, the up and down movement of the hip, the side tilt angular velocity of the shoulder, the side tilt angular velocity of the hip, and the front tilt angular velocity of the hip at BC. The difference in the longitudinal axis rotation angle of the shoulder between the 2 groups suggests a difference in the flexibility of the joint in the shoulder arm racquet system. The longitudinal axis rotation angular velocity of the shoulder reached its peak at 75 % of the duration of the analyzed segment and then decreased little by little until BC. This time is considered the stage for increasing the angular velocity of the upper arm, the forearm, the hand and then the racquet, which are more distal segments than the shoulder.

• 한국운동역학회지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.41-52
• /
• 2007

The present study analyzed the two hand backhand stroke motion of six female high school tennis players who won the championship at the National Athletic Meeting in 2006, and drew conclusions as follows. The open angle of the racket at the moment of impact was 90 degree without significant difference among the players, making a wide contact between the ball and the racket. The racket angle was 43 degree at take back and 91 at impact, showing a style of holding the racket rather upright in general. In back swing from the top to the impact, the shoulders and the hips turned by 97 degree and 40 degree, respectively. At the moment of impact, the height of the impact was 54%H, and the position of the impact was 10%H ahead of and 37%H left from the central axis of the body. The right hand made a continental grip and the left hand made a Western or semi Western grip. Through the entire swing motion, the grip angle of the left hand was smaller than that of the right hand, and those who maintained a large grip angle of the right hand at the moment of take back put the racket head slightly farther from the body. In the swing of the racket head from the lowest point to the impact, the vertical length of movement was 11%H and the horizontal length of movement was 60%H, quite long.

• 한국운동역학회지
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.421-427
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to analyze the difference between male and female tennis players' two-handed backhand stroke and to provide basic data which helps precise and efficient instruction for the sake of precise postures, enhanced performances and skills. 5 male and 5 female university players were recruited as subjects, and the mean difference between the kinematic variables such as the time from backswing to impact and total swing time, racket head velocity, change of the center of body gravity in two-handed backhand stroke through three-dimensional motion analysis. The test data was analyzed by t-test, and the alpha level of ${\alpha}$=.05 was set for all tests of significance. The findings of the study were as follows; First, there was no difference in the time from backswing to impact and total time of

• 한국운동역학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.293-300
• /
• 2015

Objective : The purpose of this study was to compare the kinematic data of the horizontal rotation movements of shoulder, hip, knee during two-handed backhand drive stroke according to two different ball directions. Methods : The kinematic variables were analyzed such as the joint angles of the lower body, horizontal rotation angles of the shoulder, hip, inter-knee segment, body twist angle and difference in angle of forward swing. Two-handed backhand drive stroke was analyzed through a three-dimensional motion analysis. The collected data were analyzed by a paired t-test, and the statistical significant value was set at ${\alpha}=.05$. Results : The findings of this study were as follows; First, there was no difference in the total angles of lower limb joints from the forward swing position to impact posterior. Second, there was no difference in the horizontal rotation angles of E1 shoulder, hip, and E2 shoulder but the horizontal rotation angles of E1 knee, E2 hip, knee, E3, and E4 shoulder, hip, and knee were different in all events. Third, there was no difference in the body twist angle of the maximum horizontal rotation. In addition, there was no difference in the angle of the body twist by the ball direction in the shoulder-hip, the hip-knee and the shoulder-knee. Conclusion : Horizontal rotation angle determines ball directions.