• 발명특허
• /
• v.10 no.12 s.118
• /
• pp.66-67
• /
• 1985

'어쨌던 오똑이와 같은 한민족의 끈질긴 얼이 발휘되어 지적소유권의 발등의 불이 잘 진화되었으면 하는 마음 간절하며 301번지의 301빌딩사무소에서 301건에 시달리는 조국의 지적소유권분야에 미력하나마 도움이 되었으면 하는 마음 간절하며…'

• Journal of Arbitration Studies
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.470-490
• /
• 1997

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.155-187
• /
• 2017

In the US, the Sections 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 are still being used to resolve disputes. The U.S' such unilateral retaliations grounded on the Sections 301 of the Trade Act, in fact, violate the WTO agreements and hinder the development of international trade as the trade partner may assume it as a reprisal move impeding the fair settlement of disputes. Here, this study is going to examine the characteristics and functions of the WTO dispute settlement system briefly and compare the countermeasures recognized to be legitimate by the WTO with the U.S' unilateral retaliation. Also, this author will analyse the US-Japan Automobiles (DS6) and EC-Bananas III (DS27) as one of the typical cases resulted from the unilateral retaliation. According to the result, these cases do not conform to WTO-consistency, and it implies that it is absurd to accept the US' unilateral retaliation internationally. In conclusion, presently, it is a global trend to solidify protectionism, and to vitalize trade and resolve trade disputes efficiently, it is needed to prohibit the recourse to unilateral retaliations and also positively apply the WTO dispute settlement system(DSU) defining rules about how to strengthen the multilateral system.