• Magazine of korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.38-48
• /
• 2021

최근 국내 건설현장들은 도심지 근접구간에서 발파진동피해를 최소화하기 위하여 전자뇌관을 이용한 미진동 전자발파공법 적용사례가 증가하고 있는 추세이다. 그러나 미진동 전자발파는 무진동 암파쇄 대체공법으로 경제성은 우수하나 시공현장에서 진동을 제어하는 공법으로 1회 굴진장을 1m 이하로 적용하고 있어 시공속도가 저하되는 문제점이 발생하고 있다. 따라서, 미진동 전자발파 수준의 진동제어와 굴착비 절감 및 시공속도를 높일 수 있는 더블데크 발파공법을 연구 및 시험을 수행하였다. 미진동 전자발파와 더블데크 전자발파 비교 시험결과 진동레벨, 발파효율, 파쇄입도, 여굴량 등이 비슷한 수준으로 평가되어 현장 적용시 굴진장 증대로 인한 공사기간 단축 및 시공비 절감이 가능할 것으로 판단되었다.

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.40 no.4
• /
• pp.47-56
• /
• 2022

It was designed as the mechanical excavation mass method on 176m because the safety thing is located around the site. But low-vibration blasting using an electronic detonator was proposed to improve constructability and economy. As a result of the suggestion blasting, both blasting noise and vibration were safe within the allowable limit, confirming the applicability of low-vibration blasting using an electronic detonator to the section. And compared with the mechanical mass excavation method, an economic evaluation was conducted about the section, and it was evaluated that there was an economic advantage as the construction period was reduced by 88 days.

• Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.157-173
• /
• 2023

Although this site is designed with a non-vibration excavation method for a section of 265 m, there are concerns about decline of constructability and economic feasibility. For this reason, the low-vibration electronic detonator blasting method was suggested. To evaluate the applicability of the low-vibration electronic detonator blasting method, the damage range of blasting vibration of low-vibration electronic detonator blasting applied just before the site (suggestion I) and low-vibration electronic detonator blasting constructed close range the subway like this site (suggestion II) was analyzed. As a result of comparing the blasting vibration damage ranges of the two suggestions, the damage range of suggestion II was calculated more conservatively. Considering the specificity of the close range of this site, suggestion II was selected for design change for safer construction. As a result, it is predicted that there will be no damage to the structure even if the 72 m section out of the non-vibration excavation 265 m section is changed to the Low-vibration electronic detonator blasting. And it is evaluated that high economic benefits can be obtained because the total expected excavation period can be reduced by 144 days from 662.5 days.

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.34 no.3
• /
• pp.17-20
• /
• 2016

This paper introduce a multistage parallel non-vibration electronic tunnel blasting cases which adapts Electronic Blasting System(EBS) and the center-cut blasting method to excavating a single line railway tunnel close to residential area. As a result, it was revealed that the vibration and noise showed a reduction of 23.5% and 75% of compared with the allowable standard. We successfully completed the tunnel excavation with decreasing construction time and construction cost and without civil compliant.

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.35 no.4
• /
• pp.36-47
• /
• 2017

Due to civil complaints on vibrations and noises arising from blasting, mechanical excavation has been widely used for tunneling rather than the method of blasting, especially in the case of being in a close-proximity of 10M-20M range to a safety-thing. However, mechanical excavation, though less, it does increase the cost of whole construction project as the period of excavation is much prolonged from lack of constructability. This study aims to research and develop an effective blasting method that can ensure the constructability of shortened excavation period whilst not compromising the safety of the safety-things in a proximity to the blasting site by using a combination of an electronic detonator that can accurately control its delay period and a Low Vibration Explosives(LoVEX) that is effective on vibration control.