• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.61-71
• /
• 2020

The Cultural Heritage Administration is operating the resident supervision and non-resident supervision system to prevent poor repair and ensure the quality of cultural heritage repairs And recently, responsible supervision system was introduced to enhance the supervision of cultural heritage repairs. However, many problems have arisen in the operation of the supervision work, and need improvement. Accordingly, this study improved the resident and non-resident supervision of cultural heritage repair and developed work guidelines for the responsible supervision. First, this research has derived unreasonable sectors and problems of work guidelines for resident supervision about cultural heritage repair and has suggested supervision work guidelines which are improved. Second, we have derived the problems of work guidelines for non-resident supervision about cultural heritage repair and has suggested non-resident supervision work guidelines which are improved. Third, this paper has proposed the development direction and detailed supervision work to perform responsible supervision as a result of the adoption of the supervision system for cultural heritage repair.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.32-42
• /
• 2013

The Korean Government introduced a cultural heritage supervision system in January 2010 to control quality and to prevent poor construction. However, cultural heritage related constructions that require supervision, a scope of supervision, supervision cost and placement of supervisors have not been standardized yet. For this reason, standards of supervision for repair works of cultural heritage that reflect the characteristics of small-scale repair works and restoration of cultural heritage are required. Accordingly, this study has suggested standards of supervision works and cost by analyzing the average construction period that is suitable for the characteristics of cultural heritage repair works. In other words, this study has suggested standards of full-time supervision costs by applying the fixed amount-added method (adding direct labor cost, direct expenses, overhead expenses, engineering fee, charges for additional works and VAT) which is the same as the method of calculating supervision costs for public construction projects because a supervisor has to work full time at a construction site to perform supervision if the project is a mid/large-scale cultural heritage repair work. Also, this study has suggested standards of part-time supervision costs for a small-scale cultural heritage repair work and the ways of supervising the construction projects by visiting the project site on important occasions. According to the result of the analysis by applying the forgoing standards of supervision costs for cultural heritage, a full-time supervision cost for cultural heritage repair works is approximately 98% compared to the construction supervision of a public construction project, and a part-time supervision is approximately 158% compared to architectural construction supervision. It is expected that the valuable cultural heritage of Korea will be preserved by controlling quality of cultural heritage repair works through the application of this study result - the standards of supervision costs for cultural heritage repair works - to an actual project.