• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.33 no.2
• /
• pp.757-769
• /
• 2013

Intangible assets for construction engineering consulting firms are very important for their valuation, because engineering consulting is typical knowledge-based business which creates value based on technical expertise and human resources. This paper presents the intangible asset classification model based on the concept of value creation in construction engineering consulting firm and proposes intangible asset valuation methodology using System Dynamics and survey data. Utilization of the valuation methodology presented in this paper would increase the public awareness of intangible assets in construction engineering consulting firm and, thus, contribute to the growth of the engineering consulting industry by realistic and accurate valuation of intangible assets.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.20 no.11
• /
• pp.487-493
• /
• 2019

This study examines the ratio of R&D expenses in intangible assets for pharmaceutical companies, and determines whether these expenses affect the firm value among companies listed on the KOSDAQ. The research subjects included annual R&D expenses of 39 pharmaceutical companies listed on the KOSDAQ between 2011 and 2017. The survey was achieved via "Panel Data Model" with "Tobin Q" as an independent variable, and the ratio of R&D expenses in intangible as a dependent variable. Results of the study conclude that the ratio of R&D expenses in intangible assets of KOSDAQ pharmaceutical companies negatively influence the Tobin Q (Enterprise Value). A large proportion of intangible assets indicates increased R & D investment, and the operating profit is likely to be low due to the high debt ratio, thereby negatively impacting the enterprise value. This study further investigates whether the existing researches are based on researches that identify the total value of R & D expenditure. Results determine a significant relationship between enterprise value and R & D expenditure.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.291-311
• /
• 2009

Intellectual Property(IP) investment and its management are an key driver to create corporate value and intangible asset value through corporate's competitiveness. The purposes of this study are to survey capability of IP management and assess the effects of IP investment and its management on the separation into groups of intangible asset value. In order to attain those purposes of this study, sample companies were taken and categorized into three groups by the level of intangible asset value ratio, and data for IP investment such as R&D expenditure and advertising expenditure were collected from 90 manufacturing companies, and data for IP management capability about patent, design and brand were taken through survey. The final results showed as followed: First, IP management capability were generally not sufficient in the results of survey. Second, mean vector for the four variables were significantly different among three groups in multivariate analysis variance. Third, the order of their contribution to separating the groups were R&D expenditure, advertising expenditure, patent management, management of design and brand in canonical variate analysis. Fourth, R&D and patent management capability were significantly related to the separation of three groups, while advertising expenditure were not significant and management of design and brand were not sure of Significance in multinomial logit discriminant analysis. Fifth, exploratory power of the discriminant model were estimated by 53% in classification analysis. Finally, strategic policy for IP investment and its management should be taken urgently to create intangible asset value and to improve the capability of its management.

• Proceedings of the Korea Society for Industrial Systems Conference
• /
• 2008.10b
• /
• pp.269-277
• /
• 2008

지식기반경제에서는 기식을 창출하거나 활용하는 능력이 기업의 경쟁력을 결정하는 중요한 요소가 될 뿐만 아니라 국가적 경쟁우위의 기본이 된다. 산업경제에서 지식기반경제로의 이행이 가속화됨에 따라 부동 산 및 설비 등 유형자산 보다는 노하우, 특허권 등의 무형자산이 기업 경쟁력에 미치는 영향이 더욱 커지고 있다. 유형자산과 마찬가지로 기업이 소유하고 있는 무형자산인 특허권의 합리적 가치평가도 중요하다. 왜냐하면 특허 가치의 정확한 평가는 기술 거래 시장의 활성화를 가져올 수 있고 또한 기업의 특허전략 수립에 필수적이기 때문이다. 하지만 유형자산과는 달리 무형자사인 특허권의 정확한 가치평가는 매우 어려운 것으로 알려져 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 특허가치 평가에 영향을 미치는 요소들을 살펴보고자 함에 있으며, 그 중에서도 제품 특성에 초점을 맞추었다.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.9 no.1
• /
• pp.153-164
• /
• 2014

This study is to investigate the effects of intangible assets such as research & development, education & training and advertisement on firm values of high-technology firms and low-technology firms listed in the KOSDAQ market, and to analyze the value-relativeness between the audit quality of companies and the expenditure of intangible assets. The substitute measurement of firm values is Tobin's Q model. The sample period for positive analysis is from 2003 to 2008, and the samples, excepting for financial business, are manufacturing companies of closing accounts corporate on December, based on companies of KOSDAQ that are listed in security. Finally, data from about 305 companies are used in this analysis. Followings are the results of the analysis. First, research & development, education & training of high-technology firms have an effect on firm values, and education & training of low-technology have an effect on firm values. Second, we find that audit quality(BIG4) increases the value relevance of R&D expenditures of high-technology firms and audit quality(BIG4) increases the value relevance of education & training expenditures of low-technology firms. This paper is meaningful in that it verified the value-relativeness of cost of intangible assets compared with high-technology firms to low-technology firms.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• autumn
• /
• pp.321-326
• /
• 2001

Current situations, such as IMF crisis, WTO agreement and decrease of construction market, demand changes to construction companies. To meet the situation, they focus on the value of the intangible assets to improve their competitive power. In Korea, Various institutes estimate the construction company in accordance with their Purposes. But their estimating method has limitations to know the potential value of the company because they don't much concentrate on characteristics of construction industry and intangible assets. This study was peformed to introduce the methodology of estimating intangible assets of company and to show the state of intangible asset of major construction companies in Korea. Market Capitalization Method(MCM) was used to calculate intangible assets and all data are based on Annual Business Report.

• Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX
• /
• v.45 no.1
• /
• pp.207-224
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to review the various valuation techniques of intangible assets. The value of intangible asset by the income approach can be measured as the present value of the economic benefit over the intangible asset's remaining useful life. The typical methods used in intangible asset economic income projections include extrapolation method, life cycle analyses, sensitivity analyses, simulation analyses, judgment method, and tabula rasa method. There are several methods available for estimating capitalization rates and discount rates for intangible asset, in which we have discussed market extraction method, capital asset pricing model, built-up method, discounted cash flow model, and weighted average cost of capital method. As the capitalization methods for intangible asset, relief-from-royalty method, excess earnings capitalization method, profit split method, residual from business enterprise method, postulated loss of income method and so on have been reviewed.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2002.11a
• /
• pp.263-276
• /
• 2002

본 논문에서는 기존의 기술가치평가모형들을 검토하여 문제점과 한계를 찾아내고, 이를 극복할 뿐만 아니라, 기술의 실제가치에 접근하고자 새로운 시도를 하였다. 먼저 1단계에서는 DCF 모형을 이용하여 사업가치를 계산하고, 2단계에서는 사업가치에서 무형자산이 차지하는 비율이 산업별로 서로 다를 것이라는 가정아래 사업가치 창출에 대한 무형자산의 기여도를 구했다. 그리고 3단계에서는 전체 사업가치 창출에서 기술의 기여가 차지하는 비중을 측정하는 기술의 기여도를 구했다. 이렇게 3단계에 걸쳐 얻은 결과를 동시에 고려하여 기술가치를 산출하였다. 그리고 마지막 4단계에서는 전 단계에서 고려되지 못했던 미래수익 창출의 불확실성을 반영하기 위해 실물옵션모형을 적용하였다. 이와 같이 평가과정을 4단계로 구분하고, 각 단계별로 평가의 특성에 맞는 방법을 채택함으로써, 기존의 평가모형이 가지고 있었던 문제점과 한계를 극복하고, 불확실성이 높은 기술자산의 실제가치에 보다 근접할 수 있었다.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.10 no.7
• /
• pp.11-22
• /
• 2012

Intangible assets are the important tool which decides upon economic wealth and development of knowledge-information economy. We have to make effective use of intangible assets in order to assure surplus earnings, competitive superiority. The importance of intangible assets, especially patent right, may be properly understood only when their values are assessed adequately. It is very significant to appraise rationally patent right value from finance support, technology transaction, investment decision, M&A, legal proceedings, strategy and etc. Thus the purpose of this study is to evaluate the economic value of a patent right using DCF(Discounted-Cash Flow Method). This paper presents the basic model, related principles and standards of valuation, and then, case analysis of patent right valuation using DCF.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.3 no.3 s.11
• /
• pp.94-102
• /
• 2002

It expresses well result measurement system's the importance that 'It can not manage that can not measure.' In this way, there is no expressivity that express difficulty. While Corporation's tangible asset is possible measuring by specific amount of money of financial statement or loss and gain statement etc, Method of corporation's intangible asset measurement is much had been introduced, but some one is not presenting objective frame. This research did size of construction corporation's intangible Asset(Intellectual Asset) through knowledge asset storing accumulation model(XYZ model) that present in LG economy research institute so that do quantification objectively. Through this, can presume construction corporation's intrinsic value level.