• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.21 no.11
• /
• pp.165-178
• /
• 2021

The Urban Regeneration New Deal project, which started in 2017, has become an important means of urban redevelopment. Anyang Myunghak Village Urban Regeneration Project was selected in 2017 and is currently in its 4th year in 2021. During that time, many conflicts have occurred in the project promotion process, and conflicts are expected to occur in the future. The purpose of this study was to find out what kind of conflicts occurred in what form and how the conflicts were resolved through what solutions at each stage by targeting these Myunghak Village urban regeneration project. And through this, the characteristics of the conflict aspects that occurred in the Myunghak Village urban regeneration project(①The occurrence of continuous conflict in the urban regeneration project ②Composed of various conflict subjects and contents ③The role of conflict-related organizations is insufficient, ④The importance of communication with residents in conflicts) and implications for conflict management in future urban regeneration projects(①continual conflict management plan, ②Early formation of the conflict management organization and strengthening its role, ③communication with residents for conflict management, ④customized conflict management for each stage of project implementation) was presented.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.105
• /
• pp.321-350
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this paper is to identify the difference between Sangsan-Simhak(象山心學) and Yangming-Simhak(陽明心學). This means that the whole history of Sung Confucianism needs to be understood based on changing philosophical paradigm according to the times, not general perception which regards the whole history of Sung Confucianism as Li-Hak (理學) and Sim-Hak(心學). This kind of perception is caused by the general perception which divides Sung Confucianism into Sim-Hak and Li-Hak. We regard the former as Chung-Chu study and the latter as Liu-Yang study. Because of this, Sangsan study is recognized as the former stage study of Yangming study and can not be placed in independent position in whole history of Sung Confucianism. And Sang is regarded that it takes diametrical opposition with Chuhsi study. So it is said that there is no point of sameness among them. But Sangsan study was generated from 'Song-Hak(宋學)' based on paradigm of Li-Hak and Yangming study was generated from 'Ming-Hak(明學)' based on paradigm of Sim-Hak. The difference between 'Song-Hak' and 'Ming-Hak' is generated from proposition called 'Sim is Li (心卽理)' that most research has overlooked. To identify these things, this paper examine the philosophical difference between 'Song-Hak' and 'Ming-Hak' and analyze the proposition 'Sim is Li(心卽理)' that regards Sangsan study and Yangming study as same philosophical system. And this paper identify the philosophical difference between Sangsan study and Yangming study by examining the method that the concept of 'Sim is Li(心卽理)' is applied in moral cultivation. This paper shows that the difference of interpretation about the concept of Li(理), between 'Song-Hak' based on Li paradigm and 'Ming-Hak' based on Ki-Hak(氣學) paradigm, causes different meaning in 'Sim is Li(心卽理)'. Through these, this paper demonstrate the difference between the paradigm of 'Song-Hak' that Chuhsi study and Sangsan study have and the paradigm of 'Ming-Hak' that Yangming study has and the fact which Sangsan study is systematic philosophy of Sung Confucianism in itself not former stage of Yangming study.

• Korean Architects
• /
• no.7 s.459
• /
• pp.54-58
• /
• 2007