• Title/Summary/Keyword: 로이코팅

Search Result 1, Processing Time 0.013 seconds

The Estimation of Heating, Cooling Load and Economical Efficiency Analysis of Insulation Paint Coating Windows (단열 도료 코팅 창호의 냉난방부하 특성분석 및 경제성 평가)

  • Jeong, Yeol-Wha;Kim, Byoung-Soo
    • Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society
    • /
    • v.31 no.6
    • /
    • pp.95-102
    • /
    • 2011
  • The purpose of study is to estimate heating, cooling load performance and economic efficiency in office building with applied the functional paint. this paint can reduced SHGC(Solar Heat Gain Coefficient) on the glazing surface by coating. In this study, estimated to compared with double glazing, low-e glazing, IP(Insulation Paint) and IPu(Insulation UV-Cut Paint) coating glazing. As a result of this study, 1)heating & cooling load Analysis, SHGC value and U-factor of double glazing is about 0.70 and 3.29($W/m^2K$). low-E glazing is about 0.65 and 2.70($W/m^2K$). Two-side it is about 0.27 and 3.25($W/m^2K$). When compared to double glazing, annual heating & cooling load of low-E glazing, Two-side IPu and IP paint coating glazing is 3,012MWh($124kWh/m^2$), 2,910MWh($120kWh/m^2$), 2,867MWh($118.4kWh/m^2$) and 2,867MWh($118.4kWh/m^2$). It i sreduced to 2.0%, 5.2%, 6.7%, and 6.7% respectively. 2)the estimation of economic efficiency, low-e glazing installed in office building can not recover the investment within a lifetime 40years. but IPu and IP paint, two-side coating in glazing, have a payback period of 13 years respectively.