• The Korean Journal of Ecology
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.21-29
• /
• 1999

This study was carried out to clarify the syntaxonomy of the pine forest in Youngdong region by the phytosociological methods. As a result of the investigation of 62 quadrats, Pinus densiflora forest was classified into four subassociations: Typical subassociation, Quercus mongolica subassociation, Rhododendron mucronulatum subassociation, Rhus chinensis subassociation. Many differences in ecological characteristics such as species composition, stratum structure, vegetation coverage and of diameter at breast height(DBH) of class distribution were found among the communities. Soil properties of the pine forest on the study area was relatively poor compared with other pine forests, especially, soil pH was strongly acidic with 4.87. Soil conditions among the subassociations appeared different. Future succession of pine forest by the similarity index of communities was proposed. Estimated degree of green naturality for Typical subassociation and Q. mongolica subassociation correspond to 7th grade, and R. mucronulatum subassociation, 8-1st grade, and R. chinensis subassociation, 8-2nd grade.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2010.05a
• /
• pp.1109-1113
• /
• 2010

창원시는 경제성장에 따른 도시화 현상으로 경작지나 녹지와 같은 투수지표면이 대단위 주택단지나 도로, 상업지구, 공장시설과 같은 불투수지표면으로 변화되어 전형적인 도시 유역특성을 띠고 있어 SWMM 모형의 적용에 적합하다. 적용대상인 남천은 창원시를 관류하는 유로연장 14.7 km의 하천으로 지류인 창원천을 포함하고 있으며, 2007년부터 환경부 지원 시범사업으로 생태하천복원사업이 계획되어 실시설계 완료 후 공사가 진행 중이나, 복원 후 하천관리를 위한 유지유량 산정 등의 타당성과 관련한 문제가 지역사회에서의 화두로 대두되고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 남천 유역의 특성을 적절히 고려한 유지유량 산정을 통해 향후 복원된 남천의 하천관리기준을 제시하고자 하였다. 본 연구에서는 2008년 실측된 남천과 창원천의 유량자료와 SWMM 유출량 모의결과를 비교, 분석하였다. 남천의 유량자료는 2008년 5월 6일부터 8월 20일까지 실측하였으며, 남천의 지류인 창원천은 유량자료 취득구간이었던 창원천교 지점에서 생태하천복원사업이 진행됨에 따라 유량자료를 취득할 수 없었으므로 남천의 유량자료를 이용하여 비유량법으로 추정하였다. 유출량 산정을 위한 강우자료는 기상청 자료를 사용하는 것이 일반적이나 마산과 창원의 강우자료를 이용한 분석 결과 강우 패턴에 차이가 있음을 발견하고 마산기상대의 자료 대신, 창원시에서 제공한 5년간 (2005년~2009년)의 자료를 사용하였다. SWAT을 이용하여 남천 유역을 39개의 소유역으로 분할하고 Arc View를 이용하여 지형인자들을 추출하여 SWMM 입력자료로 사용하였다. 입력자료 중 유출량 추정에 큰 영향을 끼치는 매개변수들은 민감도 분석을 통하여 최적의 매개변수들을 결정하고 연유출량 추정을 위한 모의를 수행하였다. 이상의 과정을 통하여 남천의 연유출량을 추정함으로써 하천관리를 위한 유지유량 산정의 기초로 활용할 수 있었다.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.46 no.5
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to identify differences of perceptions for gardens and parks between experts and the general public concerning several aspects including scope, scale, publicity, artistic and scientific nature, main materials, practicality and aesthetics, executive and management systems as well as legal understanding of garden and park. The properties of garden and park were derived through literature research, and the concept, similarity, and difference of gardens and the parks were recognized by the experts and the public viewpoint was clarified by questionnaire. As for the difference in the scope of the gardens and the parks, the expert group recognized it more widely than the general public. In general, the space recognized as a garden was the rooftop green space, and urban forests were recognized as a park. In addition, the general public recognized urban forests as gardens the same as they recognized parks, and the distinction was unclear. In the expert group, the perception that gardens were small and the parks were large was more prevalent. It was generally recognized that gardens were private spaces and the parks were public spaces. In the expert group, the gardens were more personal and the parks were more apparent to the public. In the general population, functional and scientific aspects rather than artistic creativity in both gardens and parks. In addition, both the general public and experts found that parks are more complex than gardens. The garden was centered on plant material, and the park was recognized as a center where the sculptural facilities were centered, or the plant material and the sculptural facilities were properly balanced. To the experts the view of the gardens was positive. Expert groups emphasized the aesthetics of the garden, and the parks were more practical, and the general population showed similar perceptions of utility and aesthetics when comparing gardens and parks. In addition, the utility of gardens in the general publics is more emphasized than the aesthetics of the park. Regarding the executive system the park was recognized as the public sector, and the difference was larger in the expert group. As for the management system, both experts and the general public perceive the management of the park or the garden to be carried out by the supporting organization, and it is necessary to discuss the diversification of the management subject. It is found that there is a certain difference in recognition with the mixture of concepts, and there is still a big difference in legal system and perception.