• 한국사회정책
• /
• v.23 no.2
• /
• pp.113-139
• /
• 2016

This article tries to compare exchange relations between welfare and dictatorship in the East Germany and the North Korea. Unlike capitalist welfare aiming at correcting market results socialist welfare has been proposed to satisfy people's basic needs, but it had operated as instrument of dictatorship. Relation between welfare and dictatorship could be distinguished as hard exchange and soft one in line with social construction of welfare. Welfare-dictatorship relation in East Germany had developed from its formation(1949-1970s), crisis(1980s) and dissolution(1989-1990). There had established hard exchange relation in which the legitimacy of dominance had debted to welfare as social rights. While crisis of the exchange relation had been modest in a form of insufficient supply of consumption goods, it was one of the elements of collapse of dictatorship, leading to the unification with West Germany. The journey of the exchange relation in North Korea can be characterized by its formation(1948-1980), crisis(1990s-2000s), and transformation(2010s). Unlike East Germany, welfare was socially constructed as gift form the ruler to the ruled, which made the combination of welfare and dictatorship loosely coupled. Although economic crisis was severe compared to East German one the rulers have succeeded maintaining dictatorial dominance by creating dual exchange relation. They separated core group and subordinated one supporting the former at the expense of the latter. They blocked out most of the people from soft exchange relation making bad use of muddling-through life style dependent on market activities. This strategy led to a 'dictatorship neutral welfare extinction'. Taking the high degree of institutionalization of newly establishing welfare-dictatorship relation into account, lives of most people are hardly expected to be improved by gift by their rulers even if North Korean economy will recover in the future.

• Cross-Cultural Studies
• /
• v.45
• /
• pp.145-166
• /
• 2016

The aim of this investigation was to determine the historical relationship between anti-communism in the United States and military dictatorship in Paraguay. Relations between the two countries have been of great importance since the U.S attempt to obtain hemispheric solidarity in World War II, the Cold War in Latin America, and the balance of power in the La Plata region. The Archives of Terror are official documents of police repression between Alfredo Stroessner's dictatorship and the U.S. U.S provided support and aid to Paraguay dictator. Alfredo Stroessner spanned more than half a century. The course of Paraguay-U.S. relation during his regime is illustrative of the flow of real politics in both nations. Not only did Washington had definite diplomatic goals, so did $Asunci{\acute{o}}n$. The relative disparity in power and wealth between the two nations did not necessarily hinder Paraguay's pursuit of international advantage in its relations with the United States.

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.90
• /
• pp.4-5
• /
• 1991

전체주의가 반세기의 일본군사적 파시즘밖에 경험한 것이 없는 우리가 권위주의적 독재를 자유민주주의로 오인하게 됐다면 이상할 것도 없지요. 자유와 자유민주주의란 말은 독재와 부패, 무능에 일치하여 혐오와 경멸의 대상이 된 겁니다. 자유는 우리에게 더욱 절실한 가치이니만큼 그것이 왜 얼마나 중요하면 평등 정의와 어떤 관계에 있는지 진지한 논의가 제기돼야 합니다.

• KDI북한경제리뷰
• /
• v.21 no.8
• /
• pp.3-29
• /
• 2019

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.145
• /
• pp.271-296
• /
• 2018

In this article, I intend to reveal critically both the intrinsic crux and main problems of the politics of hostile exclusion based on the effect of labeling which was designed precisely as an impure political technique and has been operated for too long in Korean society by the conservative ruling class that centered on various negative ideological labels like 'pro-North Korean leftist forces.' Firstly, what is called the 'conservative ruling class' in Korean society is in itself an antinationalistic and antidemocratic pro-Japanese dictatorship group. Secondly, the conservative ruling class as a pro-Japanese dictatorship group has utilized politically the labeling effect which regards antigovernment Korean members as pro-North Korean or rebellious persons. This group's hostile politics, based on the ideological labelling effect, deprives antigovernment persons and groups of the qualification of Korean citizenship, in order to hold and retain their supreme power in Korean society. Thirdly, the conservative ruling class has attempted to stigmatize the citizens who participate in a movement for democracy as a pro-North Korean leftist force, but such a politically impure manner is typically completely unjustified groundless labeling. Fourthly, the attempt to define the conservative ruling class as a pro-Japanese dictatorship force is normatively justified and resonably appraised insofar as such a definition has been proved to be worthy of confidence. Finally, the trial to consider Roh's regime and pro-Roh (pro-Moon) groups as a kind of Yeongnam hegemonism by several critical intellectuals and current politicians from Honam region is not only merely a groundless and unconvincing labelling, but also the failed outcome of the attempt to systemize logically their emotional antipathy and repulsion toward Roh and pro-Roh (pro-Moon) groups.

• KDI북한경제리뷰
• /
• v.21 no.8
• /
• pp.33-48
• /
• 2019

• Korean Journal of Social Issues
• /
• v.18 no.1
• /
• pp.83-125
• /
• 2017

이 연구는 유신체제 이후 대외비 문서로 분류되어 학자들 사이에서도 잘 알려지지 않았던 『경찰통계연보』의 자살 통계를 통해 1953년부터 2015년까지의 자살자수와 자살률의 시계열적 변화, 자살원인과 자살수단의 장기적인 변화의 추세를 분석하였다. 자살률의 장기시계열적인 변화를 살펴봄으로써 이 논문은 통계청 자살통계로만 파악했을 때 알려지지 않았던 한국사회 1960~70년대 개발독재시기의 자살률 추이를 분석하였고 이 시기 자살률이 매우 높았음을 논의하였다. 그리고 통계청 자살 통계와 경찰청 자살 통계의 비교 검토를 통해 1999년~2007년까지의 통계청 자살 통계가 수정 보완된 점을 지적하였다. 2000년대 초반 통계청 자살 통계의 급증과 관련한 기존 연구의 분석을 검토하면서 통계 작성의 행정적 변화가 자살 통계에 미친 영향에 대해 논의하였다.

• 프린팅코리아
• /
• v.14 no.7
• /
• pp.94-95
• /
• 2014

'인쇄인 강은기 평전'은 인쇄인으로서 민주화운동의 숨은 지사로 살다 간 강은기의 삶과 사상을 엮은 책이다. 박정희 유신체제가 서슬 퍼런 시절부터 독재정권의 감시를 피해가며 각종 시국선언문과 화보집, 소식지 등을 도맡아 인쇄했던 인쇄인 강은기의 파란만장한 삶을 담아냈다.

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.1 no.7 s.7
• /
• pp.18-19
• /
• 1991

"과학적 전진없이는 국민 보건은 퇴보된다. 과학적 발전없이는 생활 수준의 개선도 기대할 수 없고 직장의 증가도, 고용도 기대하기 어렵다. 과학적 전진없이는 독재에 대항하는 자유를 유지할 수도 없을 것이다." -Vannevar Bush, 미국 대통령 과학 자문관(1945)-

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture Conference
• /
• 2015.03a
• /
• pp.141-144
• /
• 2015