• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.35-44
• /
• 2010

Currently, the unit price of public construction projects are not being evaluated appropriately for several reasons. First, the evaluation of the unit price differ per nature of the bidding process and its estimation process. In fact, pricing is determined to meet the total price in turnkey projects and to pass the low bid price deliberation process in unit price projects, and thus, such prices cannot be said to be reasonable prices per public project. After the contract is awarded, however, the prices determined without taking into consideration the characteristic of each bidding process and price estimate process are used for the valuation of progress payment, design changes, and escalation. Furthermore, this is also being applied to other low bid deliberation process as actual public project unit price, thereby affecting other processes as well. In effect, this system increases the risks for both the owner and the bidder who have determined the unit price. This research examines the risk factor and its extent in order to properly manage it in preparation for the future.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.10 no.6
• /
• pp.107-116
• /
• 2009

As the Fundamentals of Construction Business Act was revised in December 2004 and its implementing ordinances and enforcement regulations were adjusted in June 2005, the screening system of low price subcontracting has been an obligation to the public owners, having brought about arguments for and against since it enacted in 1983. The statutes for low price subcontracting have been reinforced from this year; for example, it underlines to submit to a project and builds an information network of subcontracting works. The system's original intention was that prevents shoddy and fraudulent constructions caused by low price subcontracting and precludes disturbances of fair trade by screening that whether it satisfies the conditions or not in advance. But, the criterion for the existing low price subcontracting has several issues having held up a true mirror to the real situation. It is arguable to discharge an important task with the primary purpose. This dissertation have researched the problem with a deposit of subcontract and the low price subcontracting basic rate are being used by the criteria for deciding whether it is a low price subcontracting or not, so showing the plan of reformation based on the findings, it wishes to contribute toward making the most of the system's essential intent.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.41
• /
• pp.34-39
• /
• 1993

지난 11월1일 부정방지대책위원회(위원장, 이세중 대한변호사협회 회장)는 감사 원장에게 문민정부가 추진하고 있는 부정$\cdot$부패척결을 위한 사정차원에서 건설제도 개혁이 이뤄져야 한다는 의미가 담겨있는 $\ulcorner$건설부조리 실태 및 방지대책 보고서를 제출했다. 이 보고서에서 (1)건설사업의 기본절차 법제화 (2)정부공사단가 현실화 (3)도급한 도액의 분리 (4)최저가낙찰제 정착 (6)입찰정보누설 제재 강화 (6)담합적발기구 설치 (7)담합카르텔 형성 방지 (8)계열화에 대한 인센티브 부여 (9)주택사업자의 하도급법 적용 (10)하도급직권 실태조사 강화 등이 건의 되었으며, 특히 불공정거래 근절을 위해 현행 하도급대금 직불요건에 대금 결제 지연가능성이 높은 덤핑낙찰공사를 추가하고 하도급실태조사결과 대금지급관련 위법사항이 적발되면 관계기관 직권으로 일정기간 직불케 하는 등 하도급대금 직불제도를 확대해야 한다고 밝혔다.또한 하도급계약에 있어 대금지급 문제를 근원적으로 해결하기 위해 원도급업자의 하도급대금 지급을 보증하는 지급보증제도도 확립해야 한다고 밝혔다.