• 대학교육
• /
• s.150
• /
• pp.13-18
• /
• 2007

우리나라의 대학입학제도는 1945년 이후 60여 년간 많은 시행착오와 지속적인 변화를 겪어왔다. 그러한 과정 속에서 현재 이 선발제도는 정부와 대학 간의 주도권 싸움 양상을 보이고 있다. 2009학년도 이후부터는 내신·수능과 대학별 고사가 병존하게 되는 가운데 그 반영비율이라든가 대학에서 자체적으로 실시하는 평가의 질적인 관리에 대한 논란이 뜨거울 것으로 짐작되는 바이다. 이에 여기서는 현 대학별 고사의 평가방식인 논술의 문제점 및 개선안 등에 대해, 특히 자연계를 중심으로 살펴보고자 한다.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.146
• /
• pp.28-37
• /
• 2007

• 대학교육
• /
• s.77
• /
• pp.24-32
• /
• 1995

• 대학교육
• /
• s.185
• /
• pp.82-94
• /
• 2014

• 대학교육
• /
• s.126
• /
• pp.50-57
• /
• 2003

• 대학교육
• /
• s.189
• /
• pp.37-43
• /
• 2015

• 대학교육
• /
• s.168
• /
• pp.17-19
• /
• 2010

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.13 no.11
• /
• pp.5033-5043
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to complement the problem of lecture evaluation items and to improve the lecture evaluation items to fit to original purpose of lecture evaluation to enhance the lecture's quality. For this, meanings of good teaching, lecture evaluation domains and elements of preceding study, the contents and problems of lecture evaluation tools in A college were searched, and in this foundation, an improved lecture evaluation tool was suggested. As the result of this study, important features of the improved tool are followed: First, the compositions of evaluation domains, evaluation elements, and evaluation items were reconstituted. Second, to acquire the important information for the better lecture, the items were devised according to the features of good teaching in colleges. Third, the items concerned of evaluation elements which is commonly suggested by the lecture evaluation tools of preceding study were developed. Forth, if there is the information which is required for the enhancement of the lecture quality, the items were developed though the result could not be presented in the arithmetical means. Fifth, evaluation items to improve the problems of lecture evaluation tools which had been carried out in A college were developed.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.130
• /
• pp.116-129
• /
• 2004

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.55 no.1
• /
• pp.99-122
• /
• 2024

The purpose of this study is to analyze domestic academic library development plans, check whether key components are reflected, and seek ways to improve the establishment of academic library development plans. To this end, a rubric evaluation technique derived from research related to evaluation of foreign universities and libraries was used. The libraries of the top 15 domestic universities were selected by referring to the QS World University Evaluation and THE World University Evaluation as the subjects of the study, and how much the core components of the development plan were reflected were evaluated. The results of the study are as follows. First, as a result of evaluating the university library development plan, most of the contents of 'purpose', 'goal', and 'action plan' were reflected, but vulnerabilities were found in 'mission' and 'vision'. Second, some private academic libraries were moving toward strategic planning at the level of advanced countries, including all of the core components. Third, although most academic libraries specified 'purpose', it showed limitations due to perfunctory description and connection. In the comprehensive evaluation, out of the highest score of 15, 12 were good and 3 were poor, indicating that the development plans of domestic academic libraries were generally at a 'good' level. As an improvement measure, it was suggested to form a task force for development plan establishment, to disclose and promote development plans, and to strengthen education on development plans for librarians.