• 대학교육
• /
• s.77
• /
• pp.24-32
• /
• 1995

• 대학교육
• /
• s.67
• /
• pp.16-21
• /
• 1994

• 대학교육
• /
• s.64
• /
• pp.67-73
• /
• 1993

• KLA journal
• /
• v.36 no.3 s.292
• /
• pp.21-25
• /
• 1995

• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.255-270
• /
• 2004

American Academic Accreditation System was reviewed. Current accreditation standards of the six regional accreditation associations were analysed with reference to the evaluation of academic libraries. That analysis was led to the recognition of some trends; mission and goal based assessment, qualitative evaluation, emphasis on the student learning outcomes, emphasis on the teaching role of academic librarians, distance education, and less prescriptive text. Some suggestions were made for revision of the Korean academic accreditation standards related to libraries.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.101-118
• /
• 2000

This study examines the university accreditation program and its effect on the resources in the accredited libraries, by using library statistics published in 1990-1999. The results indicate the accreditation may effect on the increase in library seat numbers, building spaces, library holdings, and budgets which included in the evaluation criteria, and the slight decrease in library personnel which is not. It suggests library professionals to be more involved in the accreditaion process to improve the present evaluation criteria and assessment methods.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.30 no.1
• /
• pp.19-34
• /
• 1996

This study provides an overview of the accreditation landscape in Korea, and identifies some problems in the current accrediting review program which assesses the library's achievements These are as follows: (1) The weight given to the library sector is insufficient. (2) There are no indicators to appraise the achiement of the informational and educational functions of academic libraries (3) It is completely devoted to input indicators, but not process or output indicators (4) It is impossible to evaluate the quality os library services. (5) The units of statistics are not standardised. Some alternative measures and indicators are proposed to evaluate the performances of academic libraries' services. It is suggested that an official draft should be prepared by Korean academic librarians to amend the library sector of current accrediting review program.