• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.46
• /
• pp.233-286
• /
• 2015

A Collection Policy provides a direction to an archive, but also provides a foundation for developing practical measures of planning and collecting process. In terms of a Collection Policy, it enables detail collection as regulations or codes cannot be as defined as the level of collection, thus, it allows systematic and strategic approaches in collecting former presidents' records. In the case of United States, where the same presidential system exists as South Korea, although the individual Presidential Libraries and Museums have different periods of collections, the Collection Policy was implement a half century ago that is used as a foundation data for record collection. However, the Presidential Archives in South Korea do not have a Collection Policy implemented that the collection is based on 'collection regulations' and 'collection plans.' In the comparison of the Collection Policy at the Presidential Libraries and Museums in the United States and the "collection regulation" and "collection plan" at the Presidential Archives in South Korea, it shows that while the Presidential Libraries and Museums' Collection Policy applies the characteristics of individual presidents that the collection comprises the records from more than the appointed period that it includes various personal records of relating figures, events, regions, and even personal interest; the records are written in detail to the detailed scale and procedure. On the other hand, the Presidential Archives in South Korea, the records collected based on 'collection regulations' and 'collection plans' do not sufficiently apply the individual features of the former presidents that the collections remain as general and unclear. This is due to the absence of a Collection Policy that systemizes and sustains professionalism and consistency of collection plans and procedures. Hence, this study is conducted to propose collection policy implementation measures by analyzing the Collection Policy of the Presidential Libraries and Museums in the United States and identifying implications for applying individual president characteristics.

• Food Industry
• /
• s.150
• /
• pp.10-23
• /
• 1999

• Korea Petroleum Association Journal
• /
• no.1 s.11
• /
• pp.33-35
• /
• 1982

• TTA Journal
• /
• s.42
• /
• pp.157-161
• /
• 1995

• Landscaping Tree
• /
• s.91
• /
• pp.2-3
• /
• 2006

• 레미콘
• /
• no.9 s.33
• /
• pp.122-133
• /
• 1992

• Monthly Duck's Village
• /
• s.115
• /
• pp.58-62
• /
• 2013

• Korean Journal of Legislative Studies
• /
• v.27 no.1
• /
• pp.215-221
• /
• 2021

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.77
• /
• pp.5-36
• /
• 2023

In the Republic of Korea, which has adopted a strong president-centered system as a political system, comprehensive personnel verification of work ability, reputation, and misconduct for positions where the president has personnel rights is not only fundamental to the administration of the country, but is also very important for maintaining the democratic system. As the records containing the personnel verification process produced during this process also has a wide range of data on important people in the country, they themselves are very important national-level information, and there is a great possibility that they will be used as useful materials for studying current national management in future generations. Therefore, it is assumed that after the enactment of the "Act on the Management of Presidential Records" in 2007, Senior Secretary for Civil Affairs of the Office of the President, which were responsible for the personnel verification, designated a wide range of personnel verification records as presidential designated records and transferred them to the Presidential Archives. However, with the launch of the 20th government, the agency responsible for personnel verification changed from Senior Secretary for Civil Affairs of the Office of the President to the "Personnel Information Management Team" of the Ministry of Justice from June 2022, a major change occurred in the personnel verification process that had been maintained and the preservation of related records. This paper examined what personnel verification records are and how they have been preserved and managed, and proposed what issues have arisen at the record management level due to this change in the agency in charge of personnel verification, and how those issues should be resolved on a practical and institutional level.

• KSLA Bulletin
• /
• s.10
• /
• pp.151-182
• /
• 2019

올해 2019년부터 적용되는 제3차 도서관발전종합계획(2019~2023)이 1월 23일 대통령 소속 도서관정보정책위원회에서 발표되었습니다. 편집위원회에서는 문화체육관광부 홈페이지에 공개된 자료를 기반으로 주요내용을 편집.정리하여 게재합니다.