• Proceedings of the KTCVS Conference
• /
• 2004.06a
• /
• pp.160-161
• /
• 2004

• Proceedings of the KTCVS Conference
• /
• 1997.04a
• /
• pp.14-16
• /
• 1997

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.37 no.11
• /
• pp.918-921
• /
• 2004

Berry syndrome (interrupted aortic arch, aortopulmonary window, and aortic origin of right pulmonary artery with intact interventricular septum) is a very rare and complex cardiac malformation. We report a successful one-stage repair in a 14-day-old neonate without circulatory arrest.

• Korean Journal of Bronchoesophagology
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.159-163
• /
• 1995

Double aortic arch is the most common among vascular structure anomalies in infancy. It's clinical manifestations vary from incidental discovery without symptoms to symptoms of tracheal or esophageal compression such as stridor, wheezing, excessive secretion, dyspnea and dysphagia. Characteristically many patients show little sign of respiratory difficulty during sleep and quiet monents but this symptom is frequently exacerbated by crying or exertion, which may be difficult to distinguish from bronchial asthma. CT and MRI are believed to be the most valuable methods of diagnosis and surgical intervention is necessary in severe cases. Recently, we experienced a case of dyspnea due to double aortic arch. So we report this case with review of literatures.

• Proceedings of the KTCVS Conference
• /
• 1995.10a
• /
• pp.25-25
• /
• 1995

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.42 no.1
• /
• pp.100-103
• /
• 2009

Traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta is the second most common cause of death from motor vehicle accidents after head injury. About 85% of these patients do not survive to reach the hospital. The most common mechanism for this is deceleration injury, as occurs in a high speed motor vehicle accident. The aortic isthmus is the site of disruption for about 95% of all blunt thoracic aortic injuries. Another mechanism is crush injury which causes compression of the aorta between the displaced sternal body or manubrium and the thoracic vertebral column. These forces tear the inner layer of the aortic wall at an unusual location. We report here on a case of aortic arch dissection where the injury clearly occurred due to a crush injury and not because of deceleration. The surgical repair was delayed for 10 days after administering intensive medical therapy. The ascending aorta and aortic arch were replaced with an artificial graft with the patient under circulatory arrest and cerebral protection.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.37 no.11
• /
• pp.903-910
• /
• 2004

Background: The total aortic arch replacement is one of the most difficult operations with high mortality rate. But the arch first technique with subclavian arterial perfusion has been reported to be a safe methods for arch replacement. Material and Method: Between Feb 2003 and July 2004, 18 patients, 10 men and 8 women, underwent total aortic arch replacement with arch first technique. Their mean age was $59.3\pm12.9$ years. The patietns received 11 acute aortic dissections, 3 chronic aortic dissectiong aneurysms, and 4 ruptured aortic arch aneurysms. Result The mean admission period was $20.2\pm7.4$ days. There was one early mortality case which died of low cardiac output syndrome and another late mortality case which died of cerebral hemorrhage. The others were discharged without any sequelae and they were followed up for an average period of $180\pm156.3$ days. Conclusion: The total aortic arch replacement with arch first technique and subclavian arterial perfusion is a good method that will reduce the surgical mortality and the possibility of secondary late reoperation from the remnant distal aortic problems.

• Proceedings of the KTCVS Conference
• /
• 1995.10a
• /
• pp.67-67
• /
• 1995

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.33 no.8
• /
• pp.676-680
• /
• 2000

To minimize the period of brain ischemia and the potential for neurologic damage during aortic arch replacement, we used the arch-first technique. First case was a 28-year-old female with extensive aneurysm involving ascending, arch and descending thoracic aorta. Exposure was obtained via a bilateral via a bilateral thoracotomy (clamshell incision) in the anterior 4th right and 3rd left intercostal space with oblique sternotomy. To prepare for arch perfusion, the side-arm graft(10mm) was anastomosed to the aortic graft, opposite the site of the planned anastomosis to the arch vessels. After completing the arch anastomosis under total circulatory arrest(37min) and retrograde cerebral perfusion(12min), aortic graft was clamped on either side and the arch was perfused via side-arm graft for 36min. When distal aortic anastomosis was finished, distal clamp of aortic graft was released and arch vessels were perfused via common femoral artery, and the proximal aortic anastomosis was accomplished. The patient was discharged with no event. Second case was a 48-year-old male with extensive aneurysm involving ascending, arch, and aortic regurgitaiton(grade III/IV). This case was also done using the clamshell incision. Aortic valve replacement was done by valved-conduit(Vascutek 30mm), both coronary artery anastomosis using Cabrol's procedure. Last operation procedure was the same as the 1st case.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• v.43 no.5
• /
• pp.490-498
• /
• 2010

Background: A hybrid procedure using an open surgical extra-anatomic bypass of aortic arch vessels and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is less invasive than open surgery, and provides a suitable proximal landing zone. Here we report our experience with a hybrid TEVAR procedure at a single center. Material and Method: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with thoracic aortic disease who received a hybrid TEVAR procedure between August 2008 and January 2010. Patients' data were prospectively collected and mean follow-up was $10.8{\pm}5.5$ months (range 3~20). Result: Nine patients (7 males and 2 females) with a mean age of $63.8{\pm}15.8$ years (range 38~84) underwent a hybrid procedure. Five patients had an arch or a proximal descending aortic aneurysm, two had a dissecting aneurysm of the descending aorta, and two had an aneurysm of the ascending arch and descending aorta. Mean expected mortality calculated by logistic EuroSCORE was 21%. Six patients underwent debranching and rerouting from ascending aorta to arch vessels, 2 had carotid-carotid bypass grafting, and 1 underwent carotid-axillary bypass grafting. Mean operation time was $221.4{\pm}84.0$ min (range 94~364). Deployment success of endovascular stent grafting was 100% with no endoleak on completion angiography. There was no mortality, and a small embolism in the branch of the right opthalmic artery in one patient. During follow-up, one intervention was required for the endoleak. Actuarial survival at 20 months was 100%. Conclusion: Early and mid-term results are encouraging and suggest that hybrid TEVAR procedures are less invasive and safer and represent an effective technique for treating thoracic aortic disease.