• Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning
• /
• v.20 no.4
• /
• pp.253-262
• /
• 2014

This, an association research for design-improvement and model-development of exhibition shops at rural tourism communities, is to secure objective data by analyzing customers' awareness-tendency of and demand for agricultural-specialty exhibition shops. Survey-questions for finding out consumers' awareness-tendency and demand were determined through brainstorming of a professional council, 30 rural communities of which visit-rate by consumers is considerably high were selected for the recruit of 200 consumers. For investigation and analysis, survey and in-depth interview were carried out at the scene with the application of frequency analysis and summarization of their opinions, which revealed that they have a strong will to visit the rural tourism communities for the purchase of agricultural specialties along with the experience of learning-program and on-the-scene direct dealing and that their viewpoint on the direct dealing at the scene was very positive. Also it was confirmed hat their satisfaction with the purchase of agricultural specialties by on-the-scene direct dealing, their pleasure at the purchase, their satisfaction with services and their intention for re-purchase of them were very high while their satisfaction with the exhibition shops was very low. With on-the-scene survey, the consumers' opinions could be listened to in depth. Almost all of them said their satisfaction with the trip to those rural tourism communities was considerably high since they could go to those communities themselves to relieve the stress from their modern life, to experience healing and to see the goods on the scene. Their satisfaction also was attributed to the fact that they have enough trust in purchase along with feeling the warm-heartedness of rural residents. As to their awareness of exhibition shops, they showed a positive response to the on-the-scene direct dealing at rural communities while they, thinking that the space in those exhibition shops was not sufficiently wide, demanded for more systematic counters in more accessible and affordable exhibition shops so that they might be more satisfied with the exhibition shops. Their demand for the necessity of exhibition shops selling agricultural specialties was found to be over 80%, which indicates that the necessity is very high. As to the suitability of function, they have the opinion that the business at those shops had better be focused on sales since they have the understanding of information when they take a trip to the rural communities, while there was another opinion: since agricultural products are seasonal items they should be exhibited and sold at the same time. More than 90% of the respondents had a positive viewpoint on direct dealing of agricultural specialties on the scene, which showed that their response to it was very high. They preferred the permanent shops equipped with roll-around table-booths. In addition, it was revealed that they want systematic exhibition shops in rural communities because they frequent those communities for on-the-scene direct purchase. The preferred type and opinion resulting from estimation of consumers' demands have been reflected for development of practical designs. The structure of variable principles has been designed so that the types of display-case and table-booth might be created. The result of this study is a positive data as a design model which can be utilized at rural communities and will be commercialized for the verification of its validity.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.43 no.5
• /
• pp.74-86
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study was to deduce the landscape evaluation indices that can be applied from the preparation for the registration of major national farm/fishery heritages to post-management. For this purpose, the Delphi survey was performed on experts. From August to November in 2014, the primary open survey, secondary open survey, and tertiary closed survey were performed to gather opinions from 28 experts, 25 experts, and 29 experts, respectively. As a result, the landscape evaluation indices for farm/fishery heritage consisted of five areas of evaluation, ten items of evaluation, and 40 indices of evaluation. The areas of evaluation were rurality, authenticity, aesthetics, tourism potentials, and locality. Rurality was classified into rurality of farm/fishery towns and nostalgia. Authenticity was classified into objective authenticity and existential authenticity. Aesthetics was classified into attractiveness and harmony. Tourism potentials were classified into value of resources and value of usability. Locality was divided into physical originality and cultural identity. The study made the following findings: first, the general grounds of farm/fishery landscape evaluation cannot be applied when evaluating the quality of landscapes of farm/fishery heritage, as their value as a cultural heritage should be considered. Second, the new indices valued emotional factors in addition to the physical factors considered by the existing farm/fishery landscapes. The new indices involved a more expanded concept of landscapes as it also considers everyday or temporary activities, including the farm/fishery activities of local people or participation in festivals and experience programs. Third, farm/fishery heritage focuses on the lives of local people, as it involves both the synchronic and the diachronic perspectives to see what is currently visible and what is no longer visible. This brings into consideration not only the farms and the natural environments but also their relationships with the villages, especially the residential areas. Finally, the indices reflected both the farm/fishery heritage's value as cultural heritage and its value for tourism. They derived temporary and dynamic landscapes, including the trading activities of local specialty markets in relation to the production landscapes. However, further studies should be conducted as this study could not rate the relative importance of indices or compare the total scores of landscapes without the weight of each item.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Community Living Science Conference
• /
• 2009.09a
• /
• pp.103-103
• /
• 2009

한국 최초의 벼 재배지이고 농경문화의 근원지인 김포시는 경기도 북서부지역에 위치하고 있다. 북쪽과 동쪽으로 한강을 사이에 두고 있고 강화만 및 한강 하구부 염하 등이 3면을 둘러싸여 있어 김포반도라 한다. 서쪽에 문수산(376m), 장릉산(150m), 수안산(147m) 등의 낮은 산들이 소구릉지를 이루고 있으며 한강에 의한 토사의 운반 퇴적으로 이루어져 농경에 적합한 김포평야를 이룬다. 이런 특징을 갖고 있는 김포지역 향토자원 조사를 위하여 고문헌, 군지, 학술지 등의 자료를 통해 총 563종의 향토자원 목록을 정리하였다. 향토자원의 유형분류를 해보면 인물 193종(34.3%), 자연생태환경 140종(24.9%), 유물유적 136종(24.2%), 민속풍속 79종(14.0%), 전통식품 특산품 15종(2.7%)의 비율로 나타났다. 이 중 활용성이 있는 것으로 판단되는 자원을 지역 전문가 협의회를 통해 1차 선발 평가하여 기본조사를 실시하였고, 향토자원의 가치, 산업화 가능성 평가를 통해 2차 심층조사 대상을 선정하였다. 김포시 향토자원 목록 총 563종 중, 179종이 기본조사 자원으로 선정되어 기본조사를 실시한 결과, 설화 전설자원이 34종(19.0%), 전통제전 자원이 19종(10.6%), 유적사적지와 건축자원이 각 18종(10.1%), 수변 및 해양자원 자원이 15종(8.4%), 조각 자원이 15종(8.4%), 마을자원이 10종(5.6%) 등으로 나타났다. 각 자원의 명칭을 보면 설화 전설은 선돌이 전설, 김삿갓의 일화, 형제투금, 애기봉전설 등이었고, 전통제전은 김포통진두레놀이, 손돌공 진혼제, 대명리 풍어제 등의 자원이, 유적사적지는 덕포진(사적 제292호), 수안산성(지방기념물 제159호), 장릉(사적 제202호) 등으로 조사되었는데, 특히 지석묘의 분포가 많았다. 기본조사 자원을 대상으로 지역전문가 2차 협의회를 통해 향토자원의 가치, 산업화 가능성 등을 평가하여 53종을 선정하였고, 유물유적 24종(45.3%), 민속풍속 12종(22.6%), 자연 생태환경 10종(18.9%), 전통식품 특산품 4종(7.5%), 인물 3종(5.7%) 비율로 나타났다. 향토자원 산업화는 생산물 품질고급화나 농산물 가공분야가 점차 감소하고 천연염색 공예, 관광, 문화상품 등으로 다각화되고 있으므로 김포시의 농촌문화와 전통지식기술자원이 지자체와 지역주민들에 의해 활성화되기를 기대한다.