• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.15 no.10
• /
• pp.6354-6365
• /
• 2014

This study aims to suggest a direction to develop Korea's certification system by comparing the evaluation items between Korea's G-SEED (Green Standard for Energy & Environmental Design) and Germany's sustainable building certification. A number of eco-friendly building certification systems are being implemented globally. On the other hand, mutually comparable evaluation items have not been suggested up until now. Therefore, international standards have been trying to establish evaluation criteria for eco-friendly buildings, and Germany's sustainable building certification is the first certification standard that has accepted those evaluation criteria. According to the result of comparing Korea's green building certification with Germany's sustainable certification, the green building certification has evaluation items not only on environmentality (62.6%), but also on social aspects (25.4%) and economic aspects (3.0%). This suggests a crucial direction to the development of evaluation items regarding the social and economic aspects of green building certification.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Rural Architecture
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.9-18
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to analyze the usage of eco-friendly elements in Korean traditional architecture to evaluate Hanok(Unjoru and Jinwondang) according to Green Building Certification Criteria(G-SEED). The results of this study were as follows; Unjoru and Jinwondang was not enough to obtain certification points. From Site usage and Traffic category, Jinwondang gets more points than Unjoru. It's because Jinwondang is located in downtown Seoul, so it gets more points of traffic and neighborhood facility. From Energy and Environmental Pollution category, Jinwondang gets more points of energy performance than Unjoru, too. It's because Jinwondang secured insulation performance of wall and windows using insulator and glass. From Resources category, Unjoru gets more points than Jinwondang. It shows that modern Hanok was limited using natural resources. From Ecological Environments category, Jinwondang is located urban area, it's difficult to secure the open space, so Unjoru gets more points than Jinwondang. If Modern Honok installs a system that can getting point and secure insulation performance, it will be certificated according to G-SEED.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.318
• /
• pp.56-58
• /
• 2017

국토교통부는 녹색건축물 조성지원법 시행령 시행규칙을 개정하고 1월 20일부터 제로에너지건축물 인증제 시행에 들어간다. 제로에너지건축물은 고단열 건축자재와 신재생에너지를 결합하여 외부 에너지 유입을 최소화 한 건축물로 건축주는 인증을 원할 경우 인증기관에 신청하여 제로에너지건축물 인증을 받을 수 있으며, 인증받은 건축물에 대해서는 용적률 완화, 신재생에너지 설치보조금, 기부채납 부담률 완화 등의 인센티브가 제공된다.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.41-51
• /
• 2014

Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design(G-SEED) has been implemented for the realization of sustainable development and resource-saving and eco-friendly buildings from 2002. Studies about the green buildings are made actively and is being developed through constant revision. However, study results of green building have not been fully reflected in the standard. Therefore, this study analyzes the previous studies about G-SEED for school facilities and check the degree of to reflect the problems and improvements suggested in previous studies. This study will be a reference of future revision Substantial problems and requirements are not reflected in revision standard. Proposed improvement requirements are classed as to improve the items(establish specific standards, supplementation), strengthen standards(designate the prerequisite items), propose a new evaluation method, add new items. delete exist items and adjust the score. Therefore, future revision of G-SEED for school facilities should reflect the results of previous studies.

• The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.19-28
• /
• 2021

The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MOLIT) is implementing a zero-energy building (ZEB) certification to save energy for the building section and to accelerate the achievement of national greenhouse gases reduction goals in accordance with a new climate regime. In 2014, the MOLIT announced a plan for early activation of the ZEB, and in January 2016, the "Green Buildings Construction Support Act" was revised and established. In addition, the plan was established to gradually spread zero-energy buildings from the public sector in 2020 to the private sector by 2025. Therefore, this study analyzed the self-sufficiency rate of each energy factor according to the implementation of the zero energy building certification of school facilities that belong to the public sector and are included in the mandatory zero energy buildings from 2020.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.239
• /
• pp.28-30
• /
• 2010

국토해양부(장관 정종환)와 환경부(장관 이만의)는 6개 용도의 신축건축물에만 가능했던 친환경건축물 인증을 모든 용도의 신축건축물에 가능토록 하는 "친환경건축물의 인증에 관한 규칙" 개정안을 지난 5월17일 개정 공포('10.7.1 시행)했다. 이번 개정안은 저탄소 녹색건축물의 공급을 활성화하기 위해 모든 용도의 신축건축물에 대한 친환경인증[공공건축물(1만$m^2$ 이상)은 의무화, 민간건축물은 자발적 참여로 운영] 평가기준 마련과 인증기관의 전문성 강화 등을 주요내용으로 하고 있으며, 취 등록세 감면 등 인센티브 제도가 원활히 시행될 수 있도록 인증시기 및 절차를 개선하고, 인증등급을 세분화(2 $\rightarrow$ 4등급)하는 내용도 포함됐다. 국토해양부와 환경부는 이번 조치로 민간분야의 경우 본인들이 인센티브를 받기를 원하는 경우에는 친환경건축물 인증을 받을 수 있도록 하는 등 민간분야의 친환경설계를 적극 유도할 수 있는 기반을 마련했으며, "친환경건축물의 인증에 관한 규칙"의 차질 없는 시행을 위해 7월 1일까지 "친환경건축물 인증기준" (국토해양부, 환경부 공동 고시)을 개정할 계획이다. 한편, 내년부터는 기존 건축물도 친환경건축물 인증을 받을 수 있도록 그 대상범위를 확대해 나갈 예정이다.

• The Magazine of the Society of Air-Conditioning and Refrigerating Engineers of Korea
• /
• v.42 no.9
• /
• pp.18-26
• /
• 2013

• The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research
• /
• v.13 no.3
• /
• pp.15-22
• /
• 2014

Proceeded with a research with basic data about the qualification standard improvement scheme about the environment school architecture in which a comparison analyze the specialized field of BREEAM system of LEED of the hit environment building qualification standard G-SEED of the domestic and U.S Green Building Counci evaluated with the certification system of the world top class and Building Research Establish, essential item, and mark distribution and weight in this study at this and which I hit with a domestic afterward. The school facility with a hub among the equipment receiving the hit environmental qualification standard, and the range of this research does LEED of the domestic green building certification system February is revised in 2013 G-SEED and which US and BREEAM in UK with a range. The way of the research checked the environment school building certification system and situation hit home and abroad, and a comparison analyze the division of the specialized field of each country qualification standard, essential item, and mark distribution and weight.

• Journal of The Korea Institute of Healthcare Architecture
• /
• v.22 no.3
• /
• pp.17-26
• /
• 2016

Purpose: As the concerns for the environment are gradually prioritized, increasing interests of environment-friendly buildings are drawn. The Green Standard for Energy & Environmental Design (G-SEED) has been strengthened. However, there are no specific assessment criteria that reflect the special situation of healthcare facility. UK, US and Japan have green building certifications specially designed to evaluate sustainable healthcare facilities. This study has been started in order to provide basic information for developing assessment criteria for healthcare facilities in Korean Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design. Methods: In this study, we investigated three foreign green building certifications and compared their assessment system and criteria for healthcare buildings. Results: Each of the three foreign certification standards showed the difference in the system, but all contained the contents specific to healthcare facilities. Evaluation items were affected by regional cultural environment and also medical environment. Patient safety and integrative planning were the most important assessment contents. Implications: Based on this analysis, Korean Green Standard for Energy & Environmental Design for healthcare facilities will be developed.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.44 no.4
• /
• pp.45-56
• /
• 2016

In this study, an analysis has been conducted on the evaluation criteria of current G-SEED(Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design) and on the 78 buildings, certified by G-SEED, for 3 years from November, 2012 to November, 2015. Based on the results of this analysis, four issues are driven and proposed hereinafter. Issue 1 : Nowadays, the psychological proportion of landscape architecture in building is getting greater than ever so that it shows reliable reduction of carbon dioxide. Therefore, so far as the eight kinds of buildings are concerned, the evaluation items of G-SEED must include those of landscape architecture mandatorily through its enlargement. Issue 2 : It is undesirable factor that inhibits precise evaluation on landscaping area to let other areas appraise landscape architecture because it requires outstanding professionalism. So, G-SEED should not only ensure landscaping professionalism for the correct evaluation but also let landscape area participate in assessing other areas. Issue 3 : Many previous researches turned out that landscape planting technique has excellent effect on saving energy and reducing temperature of buildings. Thus, landscape planting technique of landscape area is required to be one of the evaluation items of energy sector. Issue 4 : Tree management also has to be newly included as one of the evaluation factor for the maintenance relating to the landscape architecture. G-SEED, enacted and enforced by the Green Building Creation Support Act in 2013, surely is effective system to reduce carbon dioxide in buildings. This is a special Act in its nature that is superior to Construction Law and must be observed by all means to construct buildings. Under the umbrella of this legal system, various of researches and products are contributing to creating new jobs in construction area. However, it is a well-known fact that landscape architecture area has shown less interest on this Act than that of construction area. In conclusion, it is necessary that landscape industry should conduct continuous researches on G-SEED and pay more attention to the Act enough to harvest related products and enlarge its work area.