• Title/Summary/Keyword: 김성수

Search Result 2,690, Processing Time 0.03 seconds

Objections to Sungsu Kim's Defense of the Active Route Account (김성수 교수의 활성 경로 이론에 대한 변호와 그에 대한 반론)

  • Kim, Seahwa
    • Korean Journal of Logic
    • /
    • v.18 no.1
    • /
    • pp.133-153
    • /
    • 2015
  • In his paper "Structural Equations Approach to Token Causation: The Active Route Account Revisited" Professor Sungsu Kim defends the active route account. The active route account is the theory of causation which overcomes counterexamples to the counterfactual theories of causation, while maintaining the counterfactual theorist's essential intuition that an effect depends counterfactually on a cause. Unfortunately, there are counterexamples to the active route account itself. Professor Sungsu Kim attempts to defend the active route account by rebutting those counterexamples. In this paper, I argue that his defense of the active route account is not successful.

  • PDF

The Manipulation Argument: Ernie, Diana, and Lightning Strike (조작논증과 어니, 다이애나, 번개)

  • Kim, Seahwa
    • Korean Journal of Logic
    • /
    • v.22 no.2
    • /
    • pp.233-251
    • /
    • 2019
  • In this paper, I raise objections to Sungsu Kim's argument that Sartorio's hard-line reply to the manipulation argument fails. In attacking Sartorio's argument, Sungsu Kim claims that there are two problems with Sartorio's. I argue that Sungsu Kim's argument fails by responding to these two problems. With respect to the first problem, I provide a new example of dilution of responsibility. With respect to the second problem, I argue that, contrary to what Sungsu Kim assumes, for Sartorio's argument to succeed, our intuition that Ernie is responsible in the Lightning Strike Scenario does not have to be as strong as our intuition that Ernie is not responsible in the Diana scenario.