• Title/Summary/Keyword: 기포슬러리 비중

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Physical Properties and Quality Control of Foamed Concrete with Fly Ash for Cast-in-Site (플라이애쉬를 혼입한 현장타설 경량기포콘크리트의 물리적 특성 및 품질관리)

  • 이도헌;전명훈;고진수
    • Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute
    • /
    • v.13 no.1
    • /
    • pp.69-76
    • /
    • 2001
  • Foamed concrete for cast-in-site, which shows excellent lightweight, thermal insulation, noise insulation, constructability and cost efficiency, has been applied as thermal insulation or filling material for On-dol. However, the technology is too insufficient to obtain the high level of quality, and serious problems often occur in quality control at sites. It, thus, is necessary to establish the proper and reasonable quality control method for ensuring the required quality, based on the investigation on the physical properties and their reciprocal relation. This study aims to settle the quality control method in case of applying FA foamed concrete replacing 40% by weight with fly-ash as the filling material for On-dol. The results of the study include the correlation among flow, as-placed density and foam ratio of fresh foamed concrete, the correlation between physical properties before hardening and after 28-day, provision of an equation to estimate 28-day compressive strength early with 7-day compressive strength, and suggestion of quality criteria for the revision of KS on foamed concrete for cast-in-site.

Shear Resistance of Light-gauge Steel Stud Wall infilled with light-weight foamed mortar (경량기포모르터와 합성한 경량형강 벽체의 전단 저항)

  • Lee, Sang Sup;Bae, Kyu Woong
    • Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction
    • /
    • v.16 no.4 s.71
    • /
    • pp.397-406
    • /
    • 2004
  • This paper presents the test and evaluation results on the shear strength and stiffness of a light steel stud wall from a lightweight foamed mortar (lightweight hybrid wall). The use of a lightweight foamed mortar was aimed at improving structural performance, thermal performance, and finish. Studiesshowed that it did not affect thermal performance, but it contributed to structural performance and finish when the unit weight was more than 0.8 (Editor's note: Please indicate the unit of measurement.). In this study, 14 specimens-whose parameters included the specific gravity of the lightweight foamed mortar (0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2), the spacing of the stud (450 mm, 600 mm, or 900 mm), finishing materials (such as lightweight foamed mortar, OSB, and gypsum board), and bracing-were manufactured. Three typical, steel house-framing specimens were added to compare the test results with the 14 specimens. The results of in-plane shear tests show that the use of lightweight foamed mortar (1.15~5.38 times stronger, 1.45~13.7 times stiffer) results in ultimate strength and initial stiffness. In addition, it was possible to widen the stud spacing to up to 900 mm without decreasing shear strength. It was very important to prevent the lightweight foamed mortar from shrinking and to secure the adhesion between the steel stud and the lightweight foamed mortar to improve structural performance.