• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.491-521
• /
• 2018

This paper aims to uncover success factors in technology transfer of Korean government sponsored research institutes. It presents an analytical framework of technology transfer integrating factors concerning actors, object and process. Qualitative analysis mainly based on In-depth interviews is designed and conducted to examine characteristics, similarities and differences of three types technology transfer including a supply-push model, a demand-pull model, and an interactive model. Empirical results show that capabilities and experiences of researchers, capabilities and willingness of the company and active communications in the technology transfer appear to be important factors. In particular, it was found that technology transfer was led by TLO in the demand-pull model. In addition, the demand-pull and interactive approaches tends to be more effective in the technology development and transfer process compared to the supply-push model. In other words, market-oriented R&D is needed instead of technology-driven R&D. This paper also pointed out that one of the major factors in successful technology transfer is the enhancement of TLO capacity, and the improvement of recognition about TLO.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.490-518
• /
• 2014

This study investigated the success factors of technology transfer and commercialization in the high-technology industries. We specifically analyzed the case of technology transfer between KETI and probe card company. The main purpose of this research is to seek and analyze the most influential factors which can lead to successful technology transfer and technology commercialization both in terms of government policy and corporation strategy. This research oversees the previous research works. framework setting and case study analysis to derive implications in the following points of views: technology receiver, technology provider, technology's characteristics, technology transfer's process. The important findings of this study are as follows. In the terms of technology receiver, the experience in technology transfer and commercialization, will to support for R&BD and rich technology pool are also important. In terms of technology provider, acquisition strategy, will to push, complementary assets and absorptive capacity are very crucial. In terms of technology's characteristics, R&D stage, technology category and connectivity of existing technology are closely related with successful transfer and commercialization. Finally, Support of TLO and active participation of transfer process are important factors in terms of technology transfer's process.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.754-783
• /
• 2013

This study aims to suggest an empirical approach for improving the reliability of the valuation method for the technology developed at universities by using the recent data of university technology transfer. The influencing factors, the internal capabilities of an university and the characteristics of technology area, on the outcome of university technology transfer were investigated for this study. The analysis shows that the technology area distribution of the outcome of technology transfer of each university can be classified into two type: IT and NT area oriented type, and BT and other area oriented type. The analysis also shows that the type of technology area distribution can act as a moderator in the positive relationship between each independent variables, the number of patent applications and the number of technology commercialization staff, and the outcome of technology transfer. Considering that the capability of technology development and that of technology spread are related directly or indirectly to all the technology valuation process, the analysis results imply that the reliability of the valuation method for university technology might be improved by using factors of the internal capabilities of an university and that of the characteristics of technology area.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.83-94
• /
• 2016

The objective of this paper is to examine the determinants of technology transfer for Small and Medium Enterprises. Based on IP-MARKET, KIPRIS, and Wintelips, we employ the logistic regression analysis using all data related with technology transfer in markets for intellectual property rights from 2008 through 2012. Our main results are as followings: (i)the more inventors the higher possibility; and (ii)the more claims and forwards the higher possibility of success in technology transfer in Small and Medium Enterprises.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.522-559
• /
• 2018

In this study, we reviewed and analyzed the influencing factors of technology transfer performance in the previous studies (52 domestic journals and theses) and classified the various influencing factors into 6 top factors and 13 sub-factors based on the theoretical background. The study results of previous articles were analyzed by meta-analysis method so as to calculate the overall average effect size of influencing factors of technology transfer performance. As the result, the overall effect size (ESr) calculated through meta-analysis applying random effect model is .269, which corresponds to the medium effect size. By comparing effect sizes of influencing factors, the four(4) key influencing factors were also identified, which are 'number of researchers', 'dedicated organization', 'possess technology', and 'external cooperation'. The technology transfer performance are divided into three types: the number of technology transfers, technology transfer income, and other technology transfer performances. The major influencing factors of each type are derived through meta-analysis at the sub-category level. As moderator variables, the paper type and the data type were analyzed but no significant results were obtained. Since this research is limited to the technology transfer, it is necessary to carry out the study related to the influencing factors on the technology commercialization as following study.

• Proceedings of the Technology Innovation Conference
• /
• 1996.12a
• /
• pp.99-117
• /
• 1996

본 논문은 기업내의 수직적 기술이전 문제를 다룬 사례연구로서 한 건설업체의 연구소에서 이루어진 기술개발 결과가 사업부문의 현장에 이전 활용되는 과정에서 기술이전 정도가 어떤 요인에 의해 영향을 받는지 분석하였다. 사례분석 결과 D건설의 경우 기술이전팀 및 프로젝트 추진자(Project Champion)의 존재여부가 기술이전의 성패에 가장 큰 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며 최고경영자의 적극적인 지원도 성공적인 기술이전에 강한 긍정적인 요인이 되는 것으로 분석되었다. 또한 당초 사례분석의 틀에서 고려하지 않았던 기술인지도나 기술수용자의 시장평가가 기술수용 노력에 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 사내기술이전시 이러한 요인들을 고려한다면 보다 효과적인 기술이전이 될 것으로 기대된다.

• Proceedings of the Technology Innovation Conference
• /
• 2004.06a
• /
• pp.112-127
• /
• 2004

기술의 상업화를 추구하는 기술이전 활동의 참여자는 그 역할과 개인적 특성에 따라 다양한 목적을 가진다. 본 논문은 이러한 참여자들의 역할의 차이가 기술이전 및 상업화의 성공에 미치는 영향을 분석하여 기술이전의 활성화에 관련된 정책적 시사점을 제시하는 데 그 목적이 있다. 먼저, 기술이전 및 상업화의 성공에 영향을 미치는 갈등 요인을 분석하기 위하여 기술이전 참여자를 중심으로 기술이전 과정에서의 참여 범위 및 권한에 대한 설문을 실시하였다. 기술이전참여자는 크게 공공연구소, 대학 등지에서 활동 중인 연구 개발 담당자, 기술이전기여자, 기술도입자 이렇게 세 부류로 구분하였으며, 연구개발 담당자는 다시 연구개발자와 연구개발책임자의 입장으로 나누어서 조사하였다. 또한 이러한 기준으로 분류된 참여자 간의 갈등의 유형을 다시 개인내의 갈등, 개인간의 갈등, 개인과 조직 간의 갈등, 조직 간의 갈등으로 구분하여 각 갈등 유형의 원인에 대해 인터뷰 형식으로 정보를 수집하였다. 설문지와 인터뷰를 위한 질문지는 문헌 조사 및 전문가와의 토론을 거쳐 완성되었으며 응답자는 하나의 기술이전 및 상업화 과정에 관련된 여러 주체들을 최소 설문단위로 묶어 선정하였다. 그리고 이에 대한 결과는 각 갈등의 원인에 대한 참여자의 유형 간의 편차를 보기 위하여 분산 분석(Z-Test)으로 해석하였다.

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.90-112
• /
• 1997

본 논문은 기업내의 수직적 기술이전 문제를 다룬 사례연구로서 한 건설업체의 연구소에서 이루어진 기술개발 결과가 사업부문의 현장에 이전 활용되는 과정에서 기술이전 정도가 어떤 요인에 의해 영향을 받는지 분석하였다. D건설의 사례분석 결과 기술 이전 팀 및 프로젝트 추진 자(Project Champion)의 존재 여부가 기술이전의 성패에 가장 큰 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며 최고경영자의 적극적인 지원도 성공적인 기술이전에 강한 긍정적인 요인이 되는 것으로 분석되었다. 또한 당초 사례분석의 틀에서 고려하지 않았던 기술인지도안 기술수용자의 시장평가가 기술수용 노력에 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 사내 기술 이전 시 이러한 요인들을 고려한다면 보다 효과적인 기술이전이 될 것으로 기대된다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2014.10a
• /
• pp.686-698
• /
• 2014

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.18 no.1
• /
• pp.28-48
• /
• 2015

This study is public R & D institutions report to verify what the impact factors on the course of progress of industrialization based on technology companies who previously received prior to the developed technology, what policies and plans for the next requirements based on this by offering the implications for business rate was to contribute to the improvement of the public research institution technology transfer. In this study, the influence factors on technology commercialization derived through the analysis of existing and previous studies, the characteristics of the previously received corporate environmental characteristics and previous technologies through a survey of the company received a technology transfer from public research institutions commercialization decisions and contributions, including sales and commercialization of the results were analyzed by logistic regression analysis demonstrated how to have relevance. Analysis, and linkage with high production company has an existing case of IT technology transfer, commercialization of higher technical success rate was higher compatibility. On the other hand, were observed and expected success rate were higher when a rather commercialized technologies independently be earlier than if participating in joint research in the development of the technology, unlike previously, completeness of the prior art did not significantly affect. This study has the following policy implications. Public research institutions have developed technologies are commercialized to figure out what the requirements of the technical aspects of consumer technologies in order to create economic wealth. And for technology commercialization for enough technical competencies to absorb the technology, and that the technology and considering the link between business and technology commercialization success to be applied. This study has some limitations. First, the sample size was not sufficient. In relation to the presence and participation of corporate success and commercialization of the R & D process, with many previous studies are needed more in-depth analysis by leading research in the sense that different results are obtained. Also did not reflect the will or the corporate culture, management and organizational skills and belongs to the external environment and internal corporate enterprises industry characteristics affecting the success of corporate management of the business. And lacked sufficient consideration of the various technical characteristics present in the form of joint research and industry. Finally, there is a limit of generalizations about other industries.