• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• v.1
• /
• pp.31-36
• /
• 2006

The evaluation of safety of simulated maneuvers is frequently analysed by so called goal line or point of interest. This paper is to suggest that regarding the results of simulation the goal analysis and in length analysis are investigated respectively and the availability of which is effective and is also to suggest closest distance to channel boundary at each ship's position, not centerline, as one of proximity measures.

• Journal of Navigation and Port Research
• /
• v.31 no.1 s.117
• /
• pp.1-6
• /
• 2007

The evaluation of safety of simulated maneuvers is frequently analysed by so called goal-line or point of interest in Korea. For the purpose of warning the risk in the proximity measure composed of only the goal-line analysis, this paper utilized Korea Institute of Maritime and Fisheries Technology(KIMFT) which houses a real-time, full-mission shiphandling simulator to examine the goal-line and in-length analyses in the outbound channel of Kwangyang port as an example. It used a 15,000 TEU container ship as a model under environmental conditions of the northwestly 26-knot wind and 2.2-knot ebb current. The result of two analyses showed the probability invading the channel boundary obtained by the goal-line analysis is a little greater than that of the in-length analysis. Therefore it was acknowledged that the proximity measure by the goal-line analysis alone may be followed by some risk. In addition, this paper was to suggest the closest distance to channel boundary from the ship's edge as one of proximity measures, instead of using the ship's deviation from the centerline of channel.