• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.32 no.3
• /
• pp.435-453
• /
• 2018

The results analysis of National Assessment of Educational Achievement(NAEA) can provide various implications for teaching and learning in the school field. In this study we analyzed the deviation of NAEA achievement level-based correct-answer rate and the distribution of the responses percentages for three years from 2015 to 2017 focused on multiple-choice items. First we calculated the deviation of correct-answer rate between advanced level and proficient level and between proficient level and basic level, and then we selected the items whose deviation of correct-answer rate is more than the third quartile. We explored what the content areas, behavior areas and achievement standards of each item are and what the achievement standards and characteristics of these questions are. Based on the results of the analysis, we intended to derive implications for appropriate teaching-learning methods at each achievement-level.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.42 no.2
• /
• pp.29-50
• /
• 2011

An aim of this study is to analyze status of information literacy and propose some ways strengthening its role as a cross-curriculum. Analyses show that information literacy is a basic competency of creative person composing the educational human figure under the national curriculum in Korea. In the school knowledge, its position is a procedural knowledge to create new ideas, also it is a interdisciplinary thinking skill under the instructional method. Therefore, information literacy instruction covering media and ICT literacy should exist as a main cross-curriculum to be a selective subject in the national curriculum. And finally, one of learning skills, its definition should be cleary stated such as information research and access, information analyses and interpretation, information synthesize and presentation.

• Journal of The Korean Dental Society of Anesthesiology
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2012

치과마취학의 교육목표는 치과치료 시 적절한 환자평가와 함께 동통 및 불안을 관리하기 위한 약품선택과 치과치료를 위한 흡입법과 정맥주사를 이용한 의식하진정법과 언제, 어떻게, 어디로 전신마취를 의뢰하는지를 알아야 할 사항과 특히 의학적 병력을 가진 환자와 특별한 관리가 필요한 소아 노인 장애인의 전반적 이해와 치료 전 전신적 환자평가를 할 수 있는 능력과 치과진료 중 일어날 수 있는 의료적 응급 상황과 치과응급상황을 식별하고 인공소생술을 포함한 치과 치료 과정에서 발생할 수 있는 의학적 응급상황들에 적절한 관리를 할 수 있어야 한다. 치의학교육의 최소한의 질 보장을 위한 국가적 수준의 치과의사 역량체계를 구축함으로써 치의학교육의 질 향상을 위한 치과대학(원)의 변화를 자극하고, 치과의료와 의료인력의 질적 증진 및 치과의료행위의 최소수준을 보장하는데 있다. 하지만 현행 국가고시에 있어 치과마취과학은 구강외과 과목에 포함되어 위 기술한 치과마취과학의 교육목표를 달성하는 데 어려움이 있다. 그러므로 국가수준의 치의학교육의 질에 대해 제고하고 학교의 교육과정 변화와 개선에 적용하고 국시원의 새로운 과목의 도입과 실기시험을 통하여 치과마취과학의 교육목표를 달성하는 데 목적이 있다.

• Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
• /
• v.27 no.3
• /
• pp.79-97
• /
• 2015

Curriculum may be defined as everything students learn at school or the specific plan of a subject that students are supposed to learn. The purpose and goals of the curriculum or who is in charge of developing the curriculum may differ by country. This study aimed at comparing the mechanisms in which the Home Economics curriculum is implemented in Korea and the Unite States at different levels. Considering that Korean government now supports increased autonomy of schools, allowing them to execute curricula according to their educational environments, it is meaningful that the advantages and disadvantages of the implementation mechanisms of two countries are explored. Specifically, middle schools in a City of Kyung-gi Province in South Korea and three states(Wisconsin, Ohio, and Washington states) in the United States are examined. The curriculum documents at different levels as well as study plans used by actual teachers are compared for this purpose. In case of South Korea, the nation state is in charge of curriculum development and the curriculum document defines the educational contents to detail in order to provide standardized learning experience to students. This type of closely controlled system warrants standardized educational contents and thus allows nation-wide assessment using standardized measures. On the other hand, it is difficult to accommodate diversities among students in terms of aptitudes and learning styles, and also limits creativity enhancement or integrative approach to teaching and learning. In comparison, curriculum in the United States is rather loosely defined, and more autonomy is granted to schools and teachers. Each of these two different systems may have advantages and disadvantages of their own. The findings of this study is expected to provide implications to curriculum development as well as to the development of framework and guidelines to the curriculum implementation.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.12 no.3
• /
• pp.389-410
• /
• 2010

In this paper we examined the mutural relation of quadrilateral for the purpose to know the reason why we taught the mutural relation of quadrilateral in elementary school. We looked through the several materials, for example, national curriculum, textbooks, guide books for teachers in 1st, 2nd, 3rd curriculums. Finally we found that the mutural relation of quadrilateral was deeply involved in the concept of sets, or the concept of inclusion.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.259-283
• /
• 2014

This research investigated the Revised mathematics curriculum and the National Achievement Test of Japan that advanced by leaps and bounds in PISA 2012. As compared with Korea, Japan shows similar trends in the affective domain and the cognitive domain of international achievement test. To put it concretely, this research compared and analyzed the mathematics contents domain of the 2009 revised mathematics curriculum of Korea and the 2008 revised mathematics curriculum of Japan being applied. The analysis was conducted in many aspects including overall of Japanese mathematics education system, the contents to be covered in each grade, and the methods of essential learning themes. We compared the mathematics contents dealt with each country based on the framework of analysis such as