• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제35권4호
• /
• pp.259-264
• /
• 2010

만성 궤양성 치은 병소는 편평태선, 양성점막유천포창, 심상성 천포창 등과 같은 다양한 질환에 의해 유발될 수 있으며 코티코스테로이드 약물요법이 주된 치료로 이용된다. 코티코스테로이드를 복용하는 경우 위장장애, 체중증가 등의 부작뿐만 아니라 장기 복용 시 골다공증, 당뇨 및 고혈압 발생 또는 악화, 부신기능 저하, 쿠싱증후군 등의 심각한 부작용이 발생 할 수 있어 병소가 국소 부위에 제한되어 발생하거나 전신증상을 동반하지 않는 경우 스테로이드 약물의 국소 도포가 만성 궤양성 치은 병소의 주된 치료로 이용되고 있다. 하지만 국소 스테로이드 치료를 구강 내에 사용하는 경우 타액 분비, 혀, 입술, 협점막 등의 움직임에 의해 도포한 약제가 소실되어 효과가 감소되고 병소가 넓은 부위에 분포하거나 구강 내 깊숙한 부위에 발생하는 경우 환자 스스로 약물을 도포하기가 용이하지 않으며, 질병에 이환 되지 않은 정상 점막에도 약제가 도포 되는 등의 단점이 있다. 국소 스테로이드 적용 방법의 단점을 극복하고 효과를 최대화함으로써 스테로이드 복용을 최소화할 수 있는 방법으로 스텐트를 이용한 스테로이드 밀폐 요법이 보고된 바 있으나 실제 임상에서 적극적으로 활용되지는 않고 있다. 따라서 만성 궤양성 치은 병소가 발생한 환자에게 스텐트를 이용한 국소스테로이드 치료를 시행하여 양호한 치료 효과를 보인 증례를 통해 그 효용성과 임상적 활용 방안을 알아보고자 한다.

• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.141-152
• /
• 1996

Oral Lichen Planus(OLP) is a idiopathic chronic inflammatory disease with more difficult to clear and higher recurrent rate than cutaneous lesions. But, there has been no estabilished theories about the proper treatment for OLP. The purpose of this study is to examine the clinical feature, relationship with systemic disease and dental treatment of OLP patients of Korea and to gain helpful information about clinical characteristics and treatment of OLP. The subjects chosen for the study were 54 patients who had visited Department of Oral Diagnosis & Oral Medicine at Yonsei University Dental Hospital Dental Hospital and diagnosed as OLP. Previous clinical records has been reviewed and questionnaires, oral examination, laboratory examination were done and recorded. The following results were obtained : 1. Of the 54 patients, 21 were men and 33 were women with an average age of 47.8 years. 2. The most common intraoral site was bilateral buccal mucosa, followed by unilateral buccal mucosa, gingiva, vesibule, lip mucosa, glossal mucosa, palatal mucosa and mouth floor. 3. The mixed, erosive and reticular form of OLP was most frequent(83.3%) clinical form. 4. OLP patients with liver disease were 5, and drug medication patients were 7. But, we could not find its evidence of association with OLP. 5. Associated events on onset of symptom were stress, denture wearing, dental treatemtn, and common cold. 6. Associated symptoms were dry mouth, tingling, sore throat, and altered taste perception. 30.8% of patients had no specific associated symptoms. 7. Aggravating factors of symptom were peppery food, hot food, fatigue, toothpaste, salty food, sour food, tension, and conversation. Reducing factors were cold food, sleeping. 69.2% of patients had no specific reducing factors. 8. There were no significant differences between normal papulation and OLP patients in CBC, SGOT< SGPT, Serum iron, Total iron binding capacity. 66.7% of subjects were positive response to fungus study for Candida Albicans. The incidence of stress and dental treatment on onset of symptom appeared high in OLP patients. Especially, high incidence of positive response to fungus study for Candida albicans, prescription of anti-fungal agents and dental treatment considerations may be helpful to treatment of OLP.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.281-287
• /
• 2007

Purpose: This study was conducted in order to evaluate how chemiluminescent lighting($ViziLite^{(R)}$) could increase the sharpness of margin and contrast to normal mucosa in the diagnosis of oral lichen planus(OLP), the most frequent oral premalignant lesion, compared with direct visual inspection under incandescent light. Methods: 41 consecutive patients, diagnosed to have OLP with visual inspection under incandescent light, were further examined with chemiluminescent light. The degrees of margin sharpness and lesion contrast were ranked on a scale from 1 to 3 for all patients under visual inspection and chemiluminescent light. The presence of additional lesion only detected by chemiluminescent light, complication, and discomfort were checked for each patient. After both screening tests, biopsy specimens were harvested from all patients with scalpels and histopathologic assessments were done. Results: All 41 patients were diagnosed to have OLP by both visual inspection and chemiluminescent light examination. This result was definitively diagnosed by histopathology. Degrees of margin sharpness and lesion contrast were increased by chemiluminescent light compared with visual inspection, but only the difference of lesion contrast was statistically significant. In 22.0% of patients, additional lesions were detected and 88.9% of them were diagnosed to have OLP histopathologically. 17.1% of patients noted discomfort and 9.8% of patients showed complications after chemiluminescent test. Conclusion: Chemiluminescent light may not be proper for the screen test of oral cancer or premalignant lesion but showed some possibility for additional diagnostic tool for definitively diagnosed patients in determination of lesion margin and scope.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.203-210
• /
• 2004

The purpose of this study was comparing the effectiveness in the topical applications of cyclosporine with that of steroid, the conventional and standard drug in the treatment of oral lichen planus. 21 patients with oral lichen planus were treated with cyclosporine (n=11) or steroid (n=10) by random allocations. They were recalled 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after initial treatments. In each recall, the lesion size, clinical symptoms like pain or burning sensation, and side effects were evaluated. The differences of these measurements were compared and the effects of each drug were checked. In reticulation types, steroid showed higher effectivity than cyclosporine and this difference was significant statistically. But in erythema type lesions, either drug showed no significant recovery, statistically. However, the effect of cyclosporine was thought to be more effective. The pain of the lesions was significantly decreased by cyclosporine but not by steroid. The decrease of burning sensation was more dependant upon steroid than cyclosporine, but no statistical relationship could be found. There were no clinical side effects. There was limitation to draw in conclusion due to small pool of this study group. But with the results, this suggestion could be proposed that either drug might be superior to another in effectivity in a specific lesion type or patient symptom, so selection and usage of one drug in a specific case could be better than universal application of one drug in all cases.