• Title/Summary/Keyword: 교육과정

Search Result 13,957, Processing Time 0.04 seconds

A Fundamental Study on Developing the Enrichment Curriculum for Gifted Children in Informatics Education Using Delphi Method (Delphi 기법을 적용한 심화형 정보 영재교육과정 개발의 기초연구)

  • Park, Jeong-Sun;Kim, Yung-Sik
    • The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education
    • /
    • v.13 no.4
    • /
    • pp.13-26
    • /
    • 2010
  • The purpose of this study is to develop the enrichment curriculum connected to a Revised Version of 7th National Informatics Curriculum in Middle School for gifted students in IT education. This study uses a Delphi Method to develop a curriculum which is comprised of educational objectives, educational contents, teaching-learning method and educational evaluation. This study carried out a three-round delphi survey in 'The problem-solving method and its procedure' field from grade 1 to grade 3. In this study, first, the responses of the experts about educational objectives, educational contents, teaching-learning method and educational evaluation of each grade were analyzed. Second, organized items were designed. Finally, important items were selected by statistics.

  • PDF

A Study on Curriculum Development for Disaster Management by DACUM Technique and Expert Committee (DACUM 기법과 전문가회의를 통한 방재분야 교육과정 개발에 관한 연구)

  • Min, Geum-Young;Jeong, Duk-Hoon;Shim, Hyoung-Seop
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation
    • /
    • v.11 no.3
    • /
    • pp.63-73
    • /
    • 2011
  • The purpose of this study was to suggest the education and training program for disaster management by comparison between DACUM technique applied curriculum and curriculum by expert committee, and curriculum development. First, DACUM technique applied curriculum development. Job Classification of Disaster management was consisted of four jobs - mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery - by three times discussions of expert panels. Job analysis and curriculum development were performed by the DACUM panels who consisted of three subject-matter experts and one educational expert on each field. Curriculum developed mitigation was nine courses, preparedness was twelve courses, response was seven courses, and recovery was four courses. Second, Expert committee developed curriculum. Expert committee consisted of five experts and three educational expert. Expert committee was held four times. Curriculum developed thirty five courses. Then disaster management curriculum determined by discussion of experts. disaster management curriculum considered (1)mitigation and preparedness was thirty one courses, (2)response and recovery was fourteen courses, (3)man-made was six courses, (4)manager level was four courses.

Review on the Australian Curriculum: Process of the Development and Features (호주 국가교육과정의 개발 과정 및 주요 특징)

  • So, Kyung-Hee;Jang, Ju-Kyung;Lee, Sun-Young
    • Korean Journal of Comparative Education
    • /
    • v.21 no.2
    • /
    • pp.51-73
    • /
    • 2011
  • In Australia, school education had maintained a state-based curriculum for a long time. However recently, Australia developed national curriculum and plans to implement it from 2011. It is meaningful to review why Australia tries to break with the tradition kept for many years and hand over the right to decide school curriculum from the states or territories to the nation, which is opposite from the Korean situation. Especially, because in Australia the introduction of national curriculum is regarded as one of the education revolutions, we need to investigate how the fundamental change corresponding to the 'revolution' is revealed in national curriculum. The purpose of this article is to look through process of the development and significant features about the national curriculum which Australia implements for the first time. To achieve the purpose, the article analyzes national curriculum of Australia in three ways. First, it reviews the process of introduction and development of the national curriculum. Second, the article investigates the features of curriculum guidelines and subject curriculum, focused on the structure of it. Finally, it discusses several implications that the case of Australia gives to the system of the Korean national curriculum.

Analysis of the Meaning of the 2022 Revised Curriculum (2022 개정 교육과정 의미 분석)

  • Han, Yoon Ok
    • The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
    • /
    • v.8 no.5
    • /
    • pp.59-69
    • /
    • 2022
  • The purpose of this study is to suggest improvement directions by analyzing the meaning of the 2022 revised curriculum. Research methods include literature research, surveys, and interviews. The conclusion is as follows. First, The background of the promotion has been revised to cultivate the competencies necessary for the future society and to strengthen the learner-tailored education. Second, what characterizes the 2022 revised curriculum is that it is being created in collaboration with people as a future-oriented curriculum for the first time in history. Third, the implementation of the 2022 revised curriculum is being directed towards individuality and diversity, decentralization and autonomy, digitally based education, and public performance and accountability. Fourth, the principal contents are curriculum innovation in response to future changes, cultivating community values and capacity building for learners, strengthening education for elementary, middle, and high school students to develop digital and AI literacy, and strengthening the curriculum for all.

교육과정 및 교수학적 현황 및 과제

  • Jeong, Chi-Bong
    • Communications of Mathematical Education
    • /
    • v.12
    • /
    • pp.125-139
    • /
    • 2001
  • 올해부터 7차 수학 교과과정에서 중학 1학년 학생을 대상으로 7단계 수학이 시작되었다. 7차 수학교육은 단계형, 수준별 학습을 명시적으로 도입하였다. 교육과정은 수학교사의 교수학적 전문 능력을 요구하고 있다. 따라서 각 학교와 수학교사들은 7차 수학 교과과정을 수행하기 위하여 적절한 교수 방법 및 운용 계획 등을 찾고 있다. 수학 교과과정이 성공적인 모든 교실 수업으로 실현되기 위하여 교육과정, 교육 상황, 과제들을 살펴보았다. 중등수학 교육과정의 유연성 및 교수학적 측면을 이해하기 위한 배경과 과제를 소개한다.

  • PDF

Analysis on the New Zealand Mathematics Curriculum: Focused on the Connectivity between Standards into Curriculum (뉴질랜드 수학과 교육과정 분석 - 교육과정 성취기준의 연계성을 중심으로 -)

  • Cho, Seongmin;Park, Ji Hyun;Choi, Inseon
    • School Mathematics
    • /
    • v.19 no.3
    • /
    • pp.423-441
    • /
    • 2017
  • New Zealand had reformed their national curriculum with competence and are applying the revised curriculum. As the 2015 revised national curriculum is clothed with competency-based curriculum, New Zealand may have important implications for the study of the Korean revised curriculum. In this study, we examine characteristics of the education system and the national curriculum in New Zealand. In addition, we analyze the standards into the New Zealand national curriculum in terms of 'curriculum connectivity' that is one of important curriculum criteria for improving the quality of education. For this, we look an overview of the relation between the New Zealand curriculum and NCEA, which is the core of the student-centered education system in New Zealand, and analyze the correspondence between the New Zealand curriculum and the Korean curriculum. And we establish analysis framework of curriculum connectivity based on these comparison analysis contents, and analyze Korean mathematics standards with corresponding levels from among the New Zealand mathematics curriculum. According to the results of this study, the New Zealand curriculum includes the most of standards which Korean high school students who want to enter university of natural sciences of engineering need to require. In addition, the New Zealand curriculum highlights statistical research activities for developing problem-solving ability in real life. From perspective of curriculum connectivity, 'in-depth contents' adding on to repeating mathematical concepts or contents are included in the New Zealand curriculum.

POLICY & ISSUES 기획특집_3 - 한국의 국가수준 유치원 교육과정에 나타난 유아환경교육 변화 과정과 과제

  • Ji, Ok-Jeong
    • Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
    • /
    • s.402
    • /
    • pp.19-23
    • /
    • 2012
  • 한국 유치원 교육과정에 나타난 유아환경교육 관련 내용은 교육과정이 개정되어 갈수록 점차 내용 범위가 확대되어졌으며, 그와 비례하여 점차 환경교육 관련 내용을 교육과정 전 영역에서 다루는 것으로 발전되어 왔다. 현재 한국의 유아교육 현장은 지속기능 실천방안으로서의 녹색성장교육을 강조하면서 그 효과적 적용을 고민하는 단계에 와 있다.

  • PDF

Development of a Curriculum Operating Models for the Specialized Vocational High School (특성화고등학교의 교육과정 운영 모형 개발)

  • Oh, Seunggyun;Kim, Jinsoo
    • 대한공업교육학회지
    • /
    • v.31 no.2
    • /
    • pp.83-110
    • /
    • 2006
  • A change in industrial education has been demanded with the emergence of rapidly changing knowledge-based society. Keeping pace with the current trend, the Specialized High Schools should analyze what their students need and suggest what they should do to be qualified for work. Even though the education paradigm is in the process of change from traditional industrial society to knowledge-based society, the Specialized High School still focuses on the out-of-trend traditional curriculum. Now, it's a time to introduce new curriculum which analyzes on-the-spot tasks and enhances students' creativity and capability to solve problems. For this study, new '3-Type school curriculum' models are examined. Furthermore, the on-the-spot based curriculum, which nurtures students' creativity and capability to take care of things should be adopted. This paper showed a direction toward the activation and generalization of the industrial education by specifying to which direction the 3-type curriculum-based the Specialized Vocational High School should move.

Astronomy Education in The 2015 Revised National Curriculum (2015 개정 교과 교육과정에서의 천문학 교육)

  • Sohn, Jungjoo;Jo, Hoon;Jo, Hoon
    • The Bulletin of The Korean Astronomical Society
    • /
    • v.41 no.2
    • /
    • pp.46.1-46.1
    • /
    • 2016
  • 2015 개정 교육과정은 초,중,고등학교 학생들의 기초소양교육을 강화하고 핵심개념과 원리를 중심으로 학습내용을 적정화하고 학생 중심의 교실 수업으로의 개선을 목적으로 하고 있다. 2015 개정 교육과정을 바탕으로 한 교과서가 집필되고 있는 중에 있으며 개발되는 교과서는 2018년부터 교육 현장에서 적용된다. 2015 개정 교육과정에 나타난 지구과학 과목 내 천문학 영역의 성취기준을 기존 교육과정과 비교해보고 새 교육과정의 핵심 역량을 살펴 교육 현장에서의 효과적인 천문학 교육에 대해 토의하고자 한다.

  • PDF

Implications from the Analysis of National Curriculum Implementation Supporting Cases in Australia and England (호주와 영국의 국가교육과정 적용 지원 사례 분석)

  • Ka, Eun-A;Lee, Joo-Youn;Lee, Keun-Ho;Lee, Byeong-Cheon
    • Korean Journal of Comparative Education
    • /
    • v.27 no.3
    • /
    • pp.75-100
    • /
    • 2017
  • The 2015 revised national curriculum has been implemented to first year students in elementary school, and will be expanded to middle school and high school from next year, 2018 school year. As of this year, the ways of implementing the curriculum and supporting teachers to better implement the curriculum into their classrooms are crucial. This study explores the implications for building curriculum supporting and implementing system by investigating relevant systems in foreign countries, such as Australia and England. In order to achieve the purpose, this study conducts literature review and previous studies in regards to the curriculum implementing and supporting system, interviews with curriculum developers and teachers, and analyzes their web-sites of the two countries. The results shows that active communication is essential among curriculum developers and curriculum implementers including school teachers and other stake-holders, and this communication can be achieved by building systematic ways; second, professional development for teachers should be recommended by supporting integrated and systematic teaching-learning process; third, the principal agent for curriculum implementation, school teachers, should have the autonomy for implementing the curriculum. The detailed ways for realizing the three implications are suggested.