• Title/Summary/Keyword: 교섭지위

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

An Empirical Study on Bargaining Positions and Exchange Relationship in Supply Chain Network (공급망 내 교섭지위와 기업 간 거래관계에 관한 실증연구)

  • Cho, Namhyung;Kim, TaeUng;Ryu, Sungmin
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.12 no.4
    • /
    • pp.103-113
    • /
    • 2014
  • Bargain position and trust are core issues in supply chain management, yet the effect of bargain position on trust remains to be undetermined. The purpose of this research is to present theoretical and methodological hurdles for the relationship among various bargain positions and trust, and develops a set of hypotheses about the asymmetric effect of bargain position on trust in supply chain network. An analytical tool to analyze nonlinear effects on a response surface is introduced. Based on the data collected through a survey of firms participating in Project Supply chain, a set of hypotheses is tested. The analysis results support the prediction that the bargain position perceived by the buyers have asymmetric effects on trust toward supplies, and provide more fine-grained accounts on the relationships among bargain power, bargain position and trust in a supply chain network.

Visitation rights of grandparent and the best interests of a child (조부모의 면접교섭권과 아동의 최상의 이익 - 서울가정법원 2016.2.11.결정 2015느단5586판결 검토 및 아동의 최상의 이익에 대한 사법부의 해석 -)

  • Cho, Won-Hee
    • Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
    • /
    • v.49 no.1
    • /
    • pp.85-107
    • /
    • 2018
  • The purpose of this research is to review a grandparent visitation case which court decided grandparent visitation rights in 2016 for the first time, to determined how justices interpreted the best interests of the child standard. Based on the critical review of a target case, three categories emerged: parental rights, child's rights, and the developmental environment of child. These categories help to explain how courts influence the social construction of status withing families and child's rights. This research closes the study with implications and suggestions for future social policy.

Sales Commission of Department Store and Policy Implications (백화점의 판매수수료 현황 및 정책대응 방안)

  • Lee, Jung-Hee;Hwang, Seong-Huyk;Kim, Sung-Min
    • Journal of Distribution Research
    • /
    • v.15 no.5
    • /
    • pp.37-60
    • /
    • 2010
  • Department Stores have been in place as typical large-scale retailer in Korean retail market. After Asian financial crisis in 1997, the market share of major three department stores has been increased and they have had a dominant position in relationship with vendors or manufacturers. Thus, they are able to control sales commission. Sales commission is defined as things that department stores which contribute to products sales instead of manufacturers take some portion of price as their revenue. In other words, vendors or manufacturers pay some amount of money from their sales by contracted ratio to department stores. The problem is that vendors or manufacturers think that sales commission is high. However, department stores have a different opinion that sales commission is not high because they generate new value from gathering customers and doing marketing activity on behalf of vendors or manufacturers. Because department stores have operated with business model of renting sales space to vendors or manufacturers instead of buying goods directly from them, this situation has been taken place. The revenue of department stores depend on sales commission. Thus, they want to get a dominant power to control sales commission in relationship with vendors or manufacturers. So, they have tried to increase their size and brand power. The considered policies related in sales commission of department stores are as following: preventing monopoly or oligopoly of department store, being strength of monitoring for department stores' unfair trade, strict enforcement of law for large-scale retailer's unfair trade, and inducing win-win strategy doing voluntarily by department stores.

  • PDF