• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.116-122
• /
• 2002

Purpose : A randomized prospective study was conducted to compare the efficacy of early or late alternating schedules of radiotherapy, and carboplatin and ifosfamide chemotherapy in patients with limited-disease small cell lung cancer. Materials and Methods: From August 1993 to August 1996, a total of 44 patients with newly diagnosed, limited-disease small cell lung cancer, PS $H0\~2$, wt $loss<10\%$ were enrolled in a randomized trial which compared early alternating radiotherapy (RT)/chemotherapy (CT) and late alternating RT/CT. The CT regimen included ifosfamide $1.5\;g/m^2$ IV, d1-5 and carboplatin AUC 5/d IV, d2 peformed at 4 week intervals for a total of 6 cycles. RT (54 Gy/30 fr) was started after the first cycle of CT (early arm, N=22) or after the third cycle of CT (late arm, N=22) with a split course of treatment. Results : The pretreatment characteristics between the two arms were well balanced. The response rates in the early $(86\%)$ and late $(85\%)$ arm were similar. The median survival durations and 2-year survival rates were 15 months and $22.7\%$ in the early arm, and 17 months and $14.9\%$ in the late arm (p=0.47 by the log-rank test). The two-year progression free survival rates were $19.1\%$ in the early arm and $19.6\%$ in the late arm (p=0.52 by the log-rank test). Acute grade 3 or 4 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were similar between the two arms. Eighteen patients $(82\%)$ completed 6 cycles of CT in the early arm and 17 $(77\%)$ in the late arm. Four patients received less than 45 Gy of RT in the early arm and two in the late arm. There was no significant difference in the failure patterns. The local failure rate was $43\%$ in the early arm and $45\%$ in the late arm. The first site of failure was the brain in $24\%$ of the early arm patients compared to $35\%$ in the late arm (p=0.51). Conclusion : There were no statistical differences in the overall survival rate and the pattern of failure between the early and late alternating RT/CT in patients with limited-disease small cell lung cancer.

• Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
• /
• v.48 no.5
• /
• pp.740-747
• /
• 2000

Background : To compare the efficacies and side effects of etoposide, cisplatin/cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine(VPP/CAV) with those of carboplatin etoposide(CE) in extensive stage small cell lung cancer patients. Method : Patients with extensive stage small lung cancer who has measurable disease were eligible. VPP/CAV group(n=22) was treated with cisplatin(60mg/$m^2$ iv. D1) etoposide(100mg/$m^2$ iv. D1-3), and 3 weeks later cyclophosphamide(1000mg/$m^2$ iv. D1), adriamycin( 40mg/$m^2$ iv. D1), and vincristine(1.4mg/$m^2$ iv. D1), were administered alternatively. CE group(n=22) was treated with carboplatin(325mg/$m^2$ iv. D1) and etoposide (100mg/$m^2$ iv. D1-3) ; repeated treatment was performed every 3 weeks. Result : Forty four patients were eligible for the study. The overall response rate was 61.4% (complete remission rate 0%, partial response rate 61.4%, stable disease rate 25%, progressive disease rate 13.6%), and median survival was 10.8 months. In VPP/CAV group, response rate was 54.5% (complete remission rate 0%, partial response rate 54.4%, stable disease rate 27.3%, progressive disease rate 18.2%), and, in carboplatin/etoposide group, the response rate was 68.2%(complete remission rate 0%, partial response rate 68.2%, stable disease rate 22.7%, progressive disease rate 9.1%). The median survival time was 9.5 months in the VPP/CAV group and 11 months in CE group. The toxicity of both group was moderate, and anemia was more frequent in the CE group. Conclusion : VPP/CAV regimen and CE regimen produced similar response rates and survival times in extensive stage small cell lung cancer patients. CE regimen may be effective as part of the initial therapy for extensive stage small cell lung cancer.