• Title/Summary/Keyword: 광활성화

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.023 seconds

Presentation and Characterization of Self-cleaning Steel Sheets Using TiO2 (광촉매를 이용한 자기세정 강판 제조 및 특성 분석)

  • Yu, Hye-Jin;Lee, Jeong-Hwan;Lee, Jae-Ryung
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Surface Engineering Conference
    • /
    • 2009.10a
    • /
    • pp.182-182
    • /
    • 2009
  • 실란, 실리카, 이산화티탄($TiO_2$) 광촉매의 sol-gel 반응을 통하여 자기세정 기능과 Cr-free 기능을 동시에 나타낼수 있는 친수성 자기세정 강판용 공중합체를 제조하여용융 아연 도금 강판위에박막으로 코팅하여 그 특성을 분석하였다. 코팅층의 상부에 위치한 TI층에 의하여 광활성화를 통한 친수성표면을 형성하였으며, 코팅표면에서의 수(水) 접촉각 측정결과 10도 이하의 초친수성 특성을 나타내었다.

  • PDF

Clinical assessment of whitening efficacy and safety of in-office tooth whitening system containing 15% hydrogen peroxide with or without light activation (15% 과산화수소 함유 전문가용 치아 미백제의 광활성화 여부에 따른 미백효과 및 안전성에 관한 임상평가)

  • Noh, Young-Suk;Rho, Young-Jee;Yoo, Yeon-Jee;Lee, Hyang-Ok;Lim, Sang-Min;Kweon, Hyun-Jeong;Kim, Ye-Un;Park, Seong-Yeon;Yoon, Hee-Young;Lee, Jung-Hyun;Lee, Chan-Hee;Oh, So-Ram;Kum, Kee-Yeon
    • Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
    • /
    • v.36 no.4
    • /
    • pp.306-312
    • /
    • 2011
  • Objectives: This clinical study evaluated the effect of light activation on the whitening efficacy and safety of in-office bleaching system containing 15% hydrogen peroxide gel. Materials and Methods: Thirty-three volunteers were randomly treated with (n = 17, experimental group) or without light activation (n = 16, control group), using Zoom2 white gel (15% $H_2O_2$, Discus Dental) for a total treatment time of 45 min. Visual and instrumental color measurements were obtained using Vitapan Classical shade guide and Shadepilot (DeguDent) at screening test, after bleaching, and 1 month and 3 month after bleaching. Data were analyzed using t-test, repeated measure ANOVA, and chi-squared test. Results: Zoom2 white gel produced significant shade changes in both experimental and control group when pre-treatment shade was compared with that after bleaching. However, shade difference between two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Tooth shade relapse was not detected at 3 months after bleaching. The incidence of transient tooth sensitivity was 39.4%, with being no differences between two groups. Conclusions: The application of light activation with Zoom2 white gel system neither achieved additional whitening effects nor showed more detrimental influences.

The effectiveness of sealing technique on in-office bleaching (전문가 미백시 sealing technique의 효율성에 관한 연구)

  • Lee, Yoon;Kwon, So-Ran;Park, Jeong-Won
    • Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
    • /
    • v.33 no.5
    • /
    • pp.463-471
    • /
    • 2008
  • This study investigated the clinical effectiveness and safety of sealed bleaching compared to conventional in-office bleaching using a randomized clinical trial of split arch design. Ten participants received a chairside bleaching treatment on the upper anterior teeth, and each side was randomly designated as sealed or control side. A mixture of Brite powder (PacDent, Walnut, USA), 3% hydrogen peroxide and carbamide peroxide (KoolWhite, PacDent, Walnut, USA) were used as bleaching agent. The control side was unwrapped and the experimental side was covered with a linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) wrap for sealed bleaching. The bleaching gel was light activated for 1 hour. The tooth shades were evaluated before treatment, after treatment, and at one week check up by means of a visual shade (VS) assessment using a value oriented shade guide and a computer assisted shade assessment using a spectrophotometer (SP). The data were analyzed by paired t-test. In the control and sealed groups, the visual shade scores after bleaching treatment and at check up showed statistically significant difference from the preoperative shade scores (p<.05). The shade scores of the sealed group were significantly lighter than the control immediately after bleaching and at the check-up appointment (p<0.05). Compared to prebleaching status, the ${\Delta}E$ values at post bleaching condition were $4.35{\pm}1.38\;and\;5.08{\pm}1.34$ for the control and sealed groups, respectively. The ${\Delta}E$ values at check up were $3.73{\pm}1.95\;and\;4.38{\pm}2.08$ for the control and sealed groups. ${\Delta}E$ values were greater for the sealed group both after bleaching (p<.05) and at check up (p<.05). In conclusion, both ${\Delta}E$ and shade score changes were greater for the sealed bleaching group than the conventional bleaching group, effectively demonstrating the improvement of effectiveness through sealing.