• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.217-241
• /
• 2011

The basic purpose of Customs Drawback System of the material for export goods is export support as cut a price down the export goods' price. Especially the trade volume between South Korea and China is the greatest in comparison with other countries in 2010. Therefore companies involved China is necessary to understand exactly for China's tariff system(duty drawback system). Due to inconsistent policies, it is difficult to understand VAT-related provisions on exports goods of China compared with South Korea Tax System. Accordingly, the results of this study is significant in China-related companies. In South Korea and China, amount of customs duty drawback is very large 4.017606 billion won 732.8 billion yuan respectively. Thus, the amount of customs duty drawback is greater, a comparison of customs duty drawback in South Korea and China is very necessary on Customs Drawback System.

• The Korea Swine Journal
• /
• v.11 no.3 s.115
• /
• pp.100-105
• /
• 1989

• Product Safety
• /
• s.244
• /
• pp.36-37
• /
• 2014

• Korea Petroleum Association Journal
• /
• no.10 s.80
• /
• pp.110-111
• /
• 1987

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.6 s.256
• /
• pp.36-45
• /
• 2000

방위산업의 경우 사업기술 향상의 지원을 위하여 제공하고 있는 산업구조조정자금, 연구개발지원자금 등을 활용하여 방산 물자 수출을 도모하고 있는 업체를 직접적으로 지원할 수 있는 방안을 강구하는 것이 검토되어야 한다. 이외에도 관세환급, 수출입대금결제 방법에 대한 개선 및 연불수출에 대한 지원 등 보다 과감한 자금지원이 있어야 방산 물자의 수출이 제고될 수 있을 것으로 본다.

• NEWSLETTER 전기공업
• /
• no.94-2 s.99
• /
• pp.9-28
• /
• 1994

• Korea Petroleum Association Journal
• /
• no.3 s.229
• /
• pp.49-50
• /
• 2002

이 자료는 지난 2월 25일 관세청에 제출한 건의 내용을 요약ㆍ정리한 것임-편집자 주-

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.117-142
• /
• 2014

China having largest market in the world, has been criticized by its trading partner countries due to its unfair trade practices, particularly in the field of anti-dumping regulation. The main reasons for such criticism seem to come from the incomplete anti-dumping law as instrument to protect the industry concerned. In 2001, though new anti-dumping law was established to replace the former one by revising it to meet the needs for economic development which should be secured for china to take part in the competition world as the new member of WTO. The provisions concerned have been evaluated not to be sufficient and efficient from the viewpoint of the safeguard mechanism, while are required to be modified to meet the real world of international trade law. I consider that as the biggest partner of chinese trade activity, we will need to maintain a well understanding of the Chinese anti-dumping regulations. So this report conducts the Chinese anti-dumping regulations, compares between the chinese regulations and the WTO agreement, and studies deeply in to the problems and the improvements of the Chinese anti-dumping regulations.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.213-237
• /
• 2010

Duty refund taken exports of raw materials in the manufacture of goods for import duties paid, and refunds, as a system, enhance the price competitiveness of domestic exporters to promote exports is established for them. The duty drawback system is consumed in the production of export goods levied on imported inputs does not exceed the level of reimbursement is established within the WTO rules do not restrict the export support policy is one of. Korea-EU FTA negotiations is a drawback in the ongoing maintenance of claims, while the EU claims that the duty drawback system can not be negotiated until the end of the field of focus is discussed. Intermediate goods imports to Korea is a higher percentage was pointed out the importance of duty drawback, EU FTA, the duty drawback is not a party to remain exporters of raw materials, such as 3rd party can not go back because the benefits were opposed to. The final one-EU Concessions for the current duty drawback system was to maintain continuous.

• Venture DIGEST
• /
• s.117
• /
• pp.4-7
• /
• 2008

최근 환율과 고유가.내수부진 등으로 위기에 처해 있는 중소 제조업체들에게 해외조달시장은 새로운 '블루오션' 시장이라는 측면에서 주목할 만하다. 시장규모 외에 최대 장점으로 일단 납품업체로 선정되면 장기간 물량공급이 보장되고 수출대금 결제가 확실하다는 것. 부가가치세가 환급되고 관세도 면제된다. 여기에 유엔본부 조달시장에 납품계약을 체결하면 제품의 신뢰성을 인정받아 연간 10억달러(2006년 기준)에 달하는 미국 조달시장 등 각국의 조달시장에도 진출할 수 있는 계기를 마련한다. 유엔 조달시장 규모는 2005년 기준으로 83억 달러에 달하지만 세계 11번째로 많은 분담금을 내고 있는 우리나라의 경우 국내 기업들의 진출 비중이 0.28% 수준에 머물러 있을 만큼 미개척지로 남아 있다. 유엔 조달시장은 국적 차별이 없이 전 세계를 대상으로 공개적인 입찰을 통해 우수한 공급업체를 발굴하는 데 주력하는 것을 고려한다면 국내 중소 수출업체가 높은 관심을 갖고 적극적으로 뛰어들 때 얼마든지 큰 성과를 얻을 수 있다.