• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.9 no.11 s.90
• /
• pp.27-31
• /
• 1976

• The Science & Technology
• /
• no.7 s.422
• /
• pp.52-55
• /
• 2004

• The Science & Technology
• /
• s.474
• /
• pp.39-41
• /
• 2008

• The Science & Technology
• /
• no.4 s.431
• /
• pp.42-45
• /
• 2005

• 한국과학교육학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2008.08a
• /
• pp.101.2-101.2
• /
• 2008

• 대한지구과학교육학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2011.08a
• /
• pp.71-73
• /
• 2011

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.13 no.9 s.136
• /
• pp.13-16
• /
• 1980

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.13 no.9 s.136
• /
• pp.6-7
• /
• 1980

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.41 no.1
• /
• pp.11-18
• /
• 2021

The purpose of this study is to analyze the questions generated by elementary school pre-service teachers when reading the teacher's guide for the refraction of light, and to analyze the difficulties in understanding the concept and in making instructional plans. A total of 592 meaningful questions were generated by 283 elementary school pre-service teachers after reading the teacher's guide of 'light and lens' unit in the 6th grade of the 2015 revised curriculum. Of these, 306 questions are for understanding the concept of physics and 286 are pedagogical questions. As a result of the analysis, in terms of understanding the concept of physics, the elementary school pre-service teachers encounter difficulties in understanding the concept of the 'cause' of the phenomenon suggested in the textbook, such as the cause of refraction, the reason for scattering light, and the cause of the image change depending on the focal length of the convex lens. In terms of instructional planning, it was followed by questions about how to explain concepts, questions about not being able to explain concepts to elementary school students and having to teach only phenomena, specific explanation methods for specific concepts, and experimental methods. Although the teacher's guide contains various explanations and supplementary materials to help teachers understand the concept, it can be seen that there are many elementary pre-service teachers who cannot answer questions about some concepts even after reading the guide. For concepts with a high frequency of questions, it is necessary to prepare a tutorial that is more understandable. In the instructional plan, there were many questions about teaching methods and experimental methods, so it is necessary to provide more examples and specific experimental methods for explaining concepts in the teacher's guide.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.30 no.6
• /
• pp.770-784
• /
• 2010

In this study, we investigated students' behavioral characteristics in the process of and their responses to scientific creativity activities developed based on the three steps of learning model (Park, Park, & Lee, 2008) and scientific creativity model (Park, 2004). Students' responses were obtained by questionnaire, effectiveness of learning materials was explored by comparing students activities before and after the second step, 'Guide', and various characteristic behaviors were obtained through video-recording of their activities. As results, students answered that even though the activities were a little difficult, the activities were nonetheless interesting to them, and they wanted to do the activities more completely, and wanted them in future courses. It was also found that the second step activity was helpful in improving students' divergent thinking. Finally, from the findings about various students' behavioral characteristics, some practical recommendations for more effective teaching of scientific creativity were suggested.