• 베이커리
• /
• no.4 s.357
• /
• pp.94-94
• /
• 1998

• The monthly packaging world
• /
• s.309
• /
• pp.94-97
• /
• 2019

• The monthly packaging world
• /
• s.253
• /
• pp.50-57
• /
• 2014

LG생활건강은 '고객의 아름다움과 꿈을 실현하는 최고의 생활문화기업'이 되고자 Healthy, beautiful, Refreshing의 3개 영역에서 소비자에게 가치를 제공하기 위한 사업을 펼치고 있는 매출규모 4조원의 FMCG(Fast Moving Consumer Goods) 회사이다. LG생활건강의 지속가능경영보고서에 따르면 프레스티지 화장품 부문은 기존 브랜드가 지속적으로 성장하는 가운데 스타제품 육성 등 신규 브랜드들의 성과를 자랑하고 있으며 매스티지 화장품 부문은 친환경제품에 대한 소비자들의 높아진 관심 속에 에코브랜드 '비욘드'가 급성장 한 특징을 들 수 있다. 생활용품 사업은 엘라스틴, 테크, 페리오, 샤프란 등 메가브랜드들이 이끄는 주요 카테고리들이 꾸준히 성장해 2위 업체와의 격차를 더욱 벌리며 지속적으로 시장지배력을 높여가고 있다. 이 외에도 음료 사업은 소비자 선택의 폭을 넓히는 다양한 제품보강 및 유통 커버리지 확대 등으로 지속적인 패키지 이노베이션과 소비자 선택의 폭을 넓히며 전 브랜드가 고르게 성장했다. 본 고에서는 LG생활건강의 화장품용기 감량화 사례 및 지속가능 제품 개발 사례에 대해 살펴보도록 한다.

• Journal of the East Asian Society of Dietary Life
• /
• v.21 no.6
• /
• pp.934-947
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to analyze products for good taste and convenience, which become an engine to constantly create customers. In addition, this study is aimed at investigating the relationship between the selective attributes of Home Meal Replacement, the perceived utilitarian value, and the repurchase intention, and drawing new suggestions on the Home Meal Replacement market from a new marketing perspective. Based on a total of 215 samples, this study reviewed the reliability and fitness of the research model and verified a total of 5 hypothesized using the Amos program. The result of study modeling was GFI=0.905, AGFI=0.849, NFI=0.889, CFI=0.945, and RMR=0.0.092 at the level of $x^2$=230.22 (df=126, p<0.001). First, the food quality (${\beta}$=0.221), convenience (${\beta}$=0.334), packing (${\beta}$=0.278), and employee service (${\beta}$=0.204) of home meal replacement consideration attributes had a positive (+) influence on perceived utilitarian value. Second, perceived utilitarian value (${\beta}$=0.584) had a positive (+) influence on repurchase intention. The factors to differentiate one company from other competitors in terms of the utilitarian value are the quality of food, convenience, wrapping, and services by employees. This study has illustrated the need to focus on the development of a premium menu to compete with other companies and to continue to research and develop nutritious foods that are easy to cook. Moreover, the key factors to have a distinct and constant competitive edge over other companies are the alleviation of consumer anxiety over wrapping container materials, the development of more designs, and the accumulation of service know-how. Therefore, it is necessary for a company to strongly develop the key factors based on its resources as a core capability.

• Journal of Distribution Science
• /
• v.7 no.4
• /
• pp.47-56
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study is to present an alternative improving the efficient and reasonable of the physical distribution system management is influenced by many factors. Therefore, the study depends on the documentary method and survey method to achieve the purpose of this study. The major components of a physical distribution system are refers to as elements, include warehouse·storage system, transportation system, inventory system, physical distribution information system. The factors used in this study are ① factor of product(quality·A/S·added value of product·adaption of product·technical competitive power to other enterprises), ② factor of market(market channel·kinds of customer·physical distribution share), ③ factor of warehouse·storage(warehouse design·size·direction·storage ability·warehouse quality), ④ factor of transportation(promptness·reliability·responsibility·kinds of transportation·cooperation united transportation system·national transportation network), ⑤ factor of packaging (packaging design·material·educating program·pollution degree measure program), ⑥ factor of inventory(ordinary inventory criterion·consistence for inventories record), ⑦ factor of unloaded(unloaded machine·having machine ratio), ⑧ factor of information system (physical distribution quantity analysis·usable computer part), ⑨ factor of physical distribution cost(sales ratio to product) ⑩ factor of physical distribution system(physical distribution center etc). The implication of this study can be summarized as follows: ① In firms that have not adopted a systems integrative approach, physical distribution is a fragmented and often uncoordinated set of activities spread throughout various functions with function having its own set of priorities and measurements. ② The physical distribution is recognized as more an important strategic factor than a simple cost reduction factor, ③ It can be used a strategic competition tool to enterprise.