• Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX
• /
• v.44 no.1
• /
• pp.17-35
• /
• 2014

There is no provision regarding the 'litigation on land boundary' under the Korean laws. Therefore, there are disputes in theory with respect to its nature, requirements for litigation, criteria for determination, etc., and it is necessary to establish the provisions of the law on this issue in the future. For this legislation, it is necessary to conduct a comparative consideration on laws of other countries which have completed the relevant provisions. This study, as a first step, researches a history of litigation for determination of boundary under the Roman law and medieval law, and furthermore introduces the German law which has relatively completed legal provisions on litigation for determination of boundary. In addition to common ownership litigation, the German law has established a provision on litigation for boundary as a judicial procedure considering a special place, called as a dispute on ownership of adjacent land, on the assumption that it is difficult or impossible to prove the boundary. The primary purpose of this litigation is to clarify a true boundary, and if such clarification is impossible, a boundary is discretionally created in accordance with the statutory standards under Article 920 of the German Civil Act (BGB). It means creation of the scope of land ownership by operation of decision, not only by the 'discovery of original boundary'. Both cases are different from each other in the aspect of judicial decision, but embracing them into one is a lawsuit for determination of boundary under the German law. Under the Korean legislation, it is necessary to make a theory containing two different criteria for determination into a single type of litigation, considering such aspects.

• 공원문화
• /
• s.37
• /
• pp.21-23
• /
• 1987

다음은 지난 11.12-11.14. 자연보호 중앙협의회주최.내무부.경남도 후원.제9회 자연보호세미나에서 "자연보존시책의 당면실천과제"주제로 김창환박사(한국자연보존협회장)가 발표한 논문중(2) 자연보호시책에서 언급한 것인데 내무부가 추진중인 자연보호법(안)대로의 내무부에 의한 일원화 촉진과 연구기관창설등으로 맺고 있는데 환경문제는 경계가 없어 어느 부처에 한정되는 것이 아니라 협동해서 신속.효율적으로 대처하는 선진국의 예에 따르는 것이 바람직하다는 학계 의견도 나왔고 지자제실시후의 내무부 권력변화 등은 예측키어려워 주문의 참고로서 부기한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Association of Geographic Inforamtion Studies Conference
• /
• 2010.09a
• /
• pp.25-27
• /
• 2010

현재 우리내의 지적제도는 도해지적이 가진 문제점으로 인해 도상과 현지경계가 불일치하는 지적불부합지를 양산함으로써 많은 문제점을 야기 시키고 있다. 이를 해결하고자 지적재조사 사업 추진에 대한 논의가 활발하게 이루어지고 있지만, 사업 시행 시 예상되는 갈등영향은 청산이내 경계분쟁 위주의 지엽적 논의로 이루어져왔다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 갈등이론을 토대로 갈등현황 및 한계를 도출 및 해소하기 위해, 지적재조사 사업에 대한 갈등영향평가, 조정기구의 도입, 전담추진기구 창설, 청산과 관련한 법제도의 정비, 사업소요비용의 국가전액 부담과 같은 해소방안을 제시하였으며, 사업의 원활한 추진을 위해 갈등영향평가 실시에 대한 정책적 필요성을 제안하였다. 이를 통해 지적재조사 사업 시 예상되는 강등에 대해 대처하고자 한다.

• Analyses & Alternatives
• /
• v.7 no.3
• /
• pp.85-114
• /
• 2023

The purpose of this study is to analyze Russia-Central Asia relations since the launch of the EAEU in 2015 and forecast the future from a structural realism perspective. Bilateral relations have both elements of close cooperation and elements of conflict. Russia and Central Asia, which have the characteristics of an authoritarian alliance, also have a symbiotic relationship in which they have no choice but to cooperate with each other to maintain the regime. Based on this, Russia has made various efforts to reunify Central Asia. Central Asia also has no choice but to cooperate with Russia for its survival, but at the same time, it has expanded its scope of cooperation in the international community to avoid being subjugated to Russia again. However, as China's power expands, Russia's relative weakness, and wariness toward Russia increases after the Ukraine War, the gap in bilateral relations is widening. In particular, as China's influence grows, Russia's nervousness also increases. This is why Putin visits Central Asia and holds active summit talks even during the war in Ukraine. If competition between Russia and China surfaces, there is a high possibility that the international order in Central Asia will become unstable. However, it is still unlikely that the power of Russia and China will reverse in Central Asia. Above all, the security, historical, and cultural connections between Russia and Central Asia are areas that are difficult for China to catch up with. Therefore, a weakening of Russia's influence compared to the past is inevitable, but its superiority is expected to continue. If Russia breaks away from belligerence and transforms into an attractive cooperative partner, there is a possibility that bilateral relations will take an upward turn again. However, it seems unlikely that such changes and innovations will occur under the Putin regime. Therefore, the biggest obstacle to realizing Putin's goal of reunifying Central Asia is Putin himself.