• Title/Summary/Keyword: 격납견물

Search Result 1, Processing Time 0.014 seconds

Static and Dynamic Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Axisymmetric Shell on the Elastic Foundation -With Application to the Dynamic Response Analysis of Axisymmetric Shell- (탄성지반상에 놓인 철근콘크리트 축대칭 쉘의 정적 및 동적 해석(II) -축대칭 쉘의 동적 응답 해석을 중심으로 -)

  • 조진구
    • Magazine of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers
    • /
    • v.38 no.5
    • /
    • pp.74-84
    • /
    • 1996
  • Dynamic loading of structures often causes excursions of stresses well into the inelastic range and the influence of geometric changes on the dynamic response is also significant in many cases. Therefore, both material and geometric nonlinearity effects should be considered in case that a dynamic load acts on the structure. For developing a program to analyze the dynamic response of an axisymmetric shell in this study, the material nonlinearity effect on the dynamic response was formulated by the elasto-viscoplastic model highly corresponding to the real behavior of the material. Also, the geometrically nonlinear behavior is taken into account using a total Lagrangian coordinate system, and the equilibrium equation of motion was numerically solved by a central difference scheme. A complete finite element program has been developed and the results obtained by it are compared with those in the references 1 and 2. The results are in good agreement with each other. As a case study of its application, the developed program was applied to a dynamic response analysis of a nuclear reinforced concrete containment structure. The results obtained from the' numerical examples are summarized as follows : 1. The dynamic magnification factor of the displacement and the stress were unrelated with the concrete strength. 2. As shown by the results that the displacement dynamic magnification factor were form 1.7 to 2.3 and the stress dynamic magnification factor from 1.8 to 2.5, the dynamic magnification factor of stress were larger than that of displacement. 3. The dynamic magnification factor of stress on the exterior surface was larger than that on the interior surface of the structure.

  • PDF