• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.6 no.4
• /
• pp.59-66
• /
• 2020

This paper considered the measures of securing political neutrality of the prosecutor on the reform of the prosecution. The nation's prosecution has enormous authority. In the meantime, the prosecution enjoyed unlimited power uncontrolled with investigative rights, prosecution monopoly, and police investigation command. No other country has as much power as the Korean prosecution. However, the prosecution, which enjoys such power, is placed on the task of reforming the prosecution due to poor democratic control. Has there been such a prosecutor in Korean history who only looks forward and wields long sword ehrflqtjdrhk against corruption in power? So far, the prosecution has conducted investigations that suit the administration's taste, and the prosecutors have been on the rise in return. That is why the previous administrations tried to ensure the political neutrality of the prosecution. As such, We would like to consider legal logic to analyze the sincerity of the prosecution reform. To this end, the first is to consider the authority of prosecutors and prosecutors. Second, consider the internal requirements of the government's reform of the prosecution. Third, establish the direction of prosecution reform.

• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.89
• /
• pp.2-8
• /
• 2003

공정위 중심의 행정규제주의를 수정$\cdot$보완할 필요가 있는데, 보완의 방향을 요약하면, 독점으로 피해를 본 사업자가 공정위의 시정절차와 상관없이 원고로서 바로 법원에 제소하여 구제를 받을 수 있도록 하고, 검찰도 공익 대표자로서 중대한 공정거래법 위반사안에 대해 이를 바로 법원에 기소할 수 있도록 개편하는 것이지만, 검찰과 법원내에서 시장분석 능력과 식견을 갖춘 인력의 양성이라든가 시장에 미칠 충격 등을 감안하여 일정한 기간을 두고 단계적으로 접근하는 노력이 필요하다고 생각된다.