• Title/Summary/Keyword: 강성 배분비

Search Result 5, Processing Time 0.018 seconds

Design of high stiffness and lightweight body for stiffness distribution ratio (강성 배분비를 괴려한 고강성 경량화 차체 설계)

  • Yang, Hee-Jong;Kim, Ki-Chang;Yim, Hong-Jae;Kim, Chan-Mook
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering Conference
    • /
    • 2006.11a
    • /
    • pp.562-566
    • /
    • 2006
  • Lightweight body can cause a low stiffness due to the decrease of panel thickness and reinforcing member. The other way, high stiffness body demands an increase of mass. Front pillar section area is decreased due to driver's visual field. Global vehicle stiffness is affected by stiffness distribution ratio between upper part and lower part at side body structure. This paper will describe a process used to evaluate the stiffness distribution ratio based on research of strain energy analysis of the tip rotation method. In addition, optimum design schemes are presented for high stiffness and lightweight body structure considering the investigated stiffness distribution ratio. In this way the designer will be aided by a defined design guide and a set of supporting tool to help him work towards a good design

  • PDF

Design of High Stiffness and Lightweight Body for Stiffness Distribution Ratio (강성 배분비를 고려한 고강성화 경량화 차체 설계)

  • Yang, Hee-Jong;Kim, Ki-Chang;Lim, Si-Hyung;Kim, Chan-Mook;Yim, Hong-Jae
    • Transactions of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering
    • /
    • v.17 no.10
    • /
    • pp.901-906
    • /
    • 2007
  • Lightweight body due to the decrease of panel thickness and reinforcing member might cause low stiffness. On the other hand, high stiffness body requires an increase of mass. Front pillar section area has been decreased for increasing the driver's visual field. Global vehicle stiffness is affected by stiffness distribution ratio between upper part and lower part at a side body structure. This paper describes a process used to evaluate the stiffness distribution ratio based on strain energy. In addition, optimum design schemes are presented for high stiffness and lightweight body structure considering the investigated stiffness distribution ratio.

A Comparison of Behavior of the Roadbeds of Ballasted & Concrete Track with the Cyclic Loading (자갈궤도와 콘크리트궤도에서의 하중재하에 따른 노반거동 비교)

  • Choi, Chan-Yong;Lee, Sung-Heok;Eum, Ki-Young
    • Journal of the Korean Geosynthetics Society
    • /
    • v.9 no.3
    • /
    • pp.1-8
    • /
    • 2010
  • The track systems installed in Korea railway consist of two types on ballasted track or ballastless track. In this study, it was compared with difference of the behaviors at roadbed with cyclic loading through full scale model test. From the results of model tests, loading distribution ratio of the concrete slab track become more widely distributed than ballasted track, and loading distribution ratio at concrete track was about 30:20:15. The concrete slab track is likely to behavior of the rigid plate, while ballasted track is such as flexible pavement. The vertical stresses of upper roadbed with traffic cyclic loading in concrete track were measured about 30 kPa or less. It was a scene very similar to the results of the field train running test. The vertical stress at concrete track was occurred approximately 4 times smaller than ballasted track. Also, the soil velocities with cyclic loading at the slab track were occurred about 0.3 cm/sec or less, its 8 times smaller than ballasted track.

  • PDF

Simple Model for Preliminary Design of Hexagrid Tall Building Structure (헥사그리드 고층건물구조의 예비설계를 위한 단순모델)

  • Lee, Han-Ul;Kim, Young-Chan
    • Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
    • /
    • v.18 no.6
    • /
    • pp.13-20
    • /
    • 2017
  • High-rise building shapes are changing from orthogonal to irregular form and the current trend is to arrange members in geometric grid-patterns at the perimeter of buildings. This study proposes a simple model for the preliminary design of a hexagrid high-rise building. The size of the cross section is set to be different at each module and hexagrid unit, which is different from the previous studies in which all hexagrid members were the same. To examine the effect of hexagrid size on structural performance, 60-story hexagrid buildings with 1-, 2- and 4-story high modules are designed and analyzed. Maximum lateral displacement, steel tonnage, load carrying percentage of perimeter frame and combined strength ratio are compared for 15 buildings. As the lateral load carrying capacity of hexagrid structure was inferior to a diagrid structural system, proper lateral stiffness should be allocated to the core frame in a hexagrid structure. The best ratio of flexural to shear deformation was 4 and larger unit size was better in considering constructional cost and structural efficiency. As the maximum lateral displacements of the buildings were within 84%~108% of the limit, the proposed method seems to be applicable to preliminary design of hexagrid buildings.

Who Gets Government SME R&D Subsidy? Application of Gradient Boosting Model (Gradient Boosting 모형을 이용한 중소기업 R&D 지원금 결정요인 분석)

  • Kang, Sung Won;Kang, HeeChan
    • The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies
    • /
    • v.25 no.4
    • /
    • pp.77-109
    • /
    • 2020
  • In this paper, we build a gradient Boosting model to predict government SME R&D subsidy, select features of high importance, and measure the impact of each features to the predicted subsidy using PDP and SHAP value. Unlike previous empirical researches, we focus on the effect of the R&D subsidy distribution pattern to the incentive of the firms participating subsidy competition. We used the firm data constructed by KISTEP linking government R&D subsidy record with financial statements provided by NICE, and applied a Gradient Boosting model to predict R&D subsidy. We found that firms with higher R&D performance and larger R&D investment tend to have higher R&D subsidies, but firms with higher operation profit or total asset turnover rate tend to have lower R&D subsidies. Our results suggest that current government R&D subsidy distribution pattern provides incentive to improve R&D project performance, but not business performance.