• 대한물리치료사협회지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.95-103
• /
• 1989

• 융합정보논문지
• /
• 제9권10호
• /
• pp.220-226
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 발바닥 굽힘근에 저주파 치료인 경피신경전기자극과 중주파 치료인 간섭전류가 뇌졸중 환자의 보행 및 발목 관절가동범위에 즉각적인 영향을 미치는지 알고자 한다. 30명의 연구대상자는 경피신경전기자극군과 간섭전류군으로 동일하게 나누어 마비측 장딴지근에 각각 통전하였다. 60분 통전 직후 스마트폰을 이용한 보행 평가와 발등 굽힘 관절가동범위를 측정하였다. 연구결과 두 전기치료 방법 모두 보행속도, 분속수, 발목 관절가동범위에 유의한 증가를 보였다. 두 전기치료 방법 모두 뇌졸중 환자의 보행 및 발목 관절가동범위를 증가시킬 수 있는 중재 방법이었지만 두 전기치료방법 간의 차이는 더 많은 대상자 모집을 통해 확인되어야 할 것이다.

• 한국진공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국진공학회 2009년도 제38회 동계학술대회 초록집
• /
• pp.288-288
• /
• 2010

현대사회의 급속한 고령화로 암 환자의 수는 2002년 기준 약 10만 명에서 매년 7~10 %씩 증가되어 2012년에는 20만 명이 될 것으로 추정되어지고 있다. 수술, 방사선 치료, 약물요법 등이 주요 치료방법이며, 암 환자의 30-50 %가 전리 방사선치료를 받고 있다. 방사선치료는 19세기 말에 발견된 미지의 X-선이 희망의 방사선으로 변화하여 암의 진단 및 치료에 활용되고 있으며, 인간 삶의 질 향상에 핵심적인 역할을 담당하고 있다. 기존의 X-선이나 감마선의 단점을 극복 할 수 있는 입자 빔을 1970년대 미국의 캘리포니아 대학 Berkely National Laboratory에서 처음으로 암 치료에 적용하였다. 현재는 일본과 독일에서 활발하게 활용되고 있으며 국내에서도 입자 치료시설을 구축 또는 개발계획 중에 있다. 방사선치료의 완치율을 높이기 위해서는 정확한 선량을 암세포에 전달해야 한다. 환자에 전달되는 입자빔을 실시간으로 측정하는 기술이 연구되어지고 있다. 지금까지는 빔의 특성을 측정하기 위해 간섭적인 방법을 사용하였으나, 투과형 검출기를 개발하여 실시간으로 치료와 빔 특성을 동시에 수행하는 기술개발연구가 보고되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 Multileaf Faraday Cup (MLPC) 검출기 설계구조와 데이터 측정방법에 관한 연구를 수행하고자 한다. 빔의 전송 방향으로 3개층의 $4{\times}4$ 배열의 구조로 48 channel의 전류값을 측정하여 입자빔의 분포를 실시간으로 관측하고, 측정된 전류는 ADC를 거쳐 치료계획에 의해 선택된 영역의 SOBP를 유지하도록 range modulation propeller를 조절하는 feed-back system을 갖춘 방사선치료빔 실시간 측정장치 개발에 관한 결과를 보고하고자 한다.

• 대한물리치료과학회지
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2009

Background: The purpose of this study is to have examined the influence on the blood circulation by comparing the differences between stimulating the sympathetic ganglion and the muscle group among the stimulation variables in interferential current stimulation. Method: The object of the study is the twenties(M=8, F=12), who are in great condition and have no pathological report for the blood circulation influence. The intensity of the inferential current stimulation is the medium degree, 100 bps constant current, which is the comfort and degree to confirm the muscle contraction. The areas stimulated are the stellate ganglion area in the seventh cervical vertebrae and the forearm muscle area. Results: We have made sure that there is no change in blood pressure and pulse and that the change in the skin temperature occurred highly. Conclusion: In considering the change of the blood circulation in case of stimulation area by the inferential current stimulation, we have seen that stimulating the sympathetic ganglion area is more effective than stimulating muscle area directly.

• 대한임상전기생리학회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2004

This study was conducted to assess the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation(TENS) and interferential current(IFC) in the patients with myofascial pain syndrome(MPS) on upper trapezius. Twenty patients with MPS on upper trapezius was assigned randomly to TENS group(n=10), IFC group(n=10). In TENS group, TENS was applied to the trigger point. In IFC group, IFC was applied to the trigger point. Duration of treatment was 2 weeks. Effects were assessed before treatment, post treatment by visual analogue scale(VAS), and pain rating score(PRS). Significant change of VAS was noticed in TENS group and IFC group. Significant change of PRS was noticed in TENS group and IFC group. IFC groups were significantly higher than TENS group that of the VAS and PRS. These result showed that IFC is effective treatment method for pain control in patients with MPS.

• The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.140-150
• /
• 2003

The purpose of study was to compare change of blood volume on upper limb of stimulus site on interferential current therapy. Twenty university student(twelve females. eight males :mean aged 23.08) with health condition participated this study MP150 system(biopac system) was used to measured blood volume. PPG senser was located thrum finger end The obtain result are as follows. 1. The result of this study were following that stimulate time blood volume were significantly increased sympathetic stimulation group compared with muscle stimulation group(p<.05). 2. The result of this study were following that stimulate time blood volume were significantly increased sympathetic stimulation group compared with muscle stimulation group(p<.05). 3. The result of this study were following that sympathetic stimulation group were significantly increased stimulate time blood volume compared with stimulate time blood volume(p<.05). 4. The result of this study were following that muscle stimulation group were significantly increased stimulate time blood volume compared with stimulate time blood volume(p<.05).

• 대한물리치료과학회지
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.15-23
• /
• 2018

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of Interferential current stimulation therapy(ICT) on pain, balance, and walking ability of elderly patients with chronic low back pain. Methods: Twenty participants were randomly assigned to ICT group (2 males and 8 females) and placebo ICT group (3 males and 7 females). Participants were ICT and placebo ICT for 20 minutes, and the pre- and post-VAS, TUG and postural balance were measured. Results: The ICT group showed significantly decreased pain scores in the elderly patients with chronic low back pain (p<.05) than the placebo ICT group. The postural fluctuation with eyes opened and closed was significantly lower than the placebo ICT group(p<.05), and the ICT group showed remarkable improvement (p<.05). Conclusion: ICT was expected to improve decrease pain, improve postureal sway and walking ability remarkably. Therefore, It was expected that the application or ICT would be an effective method for elderly patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.

• The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.187-194
• /
• 2013

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of interferential current therapy (ICT) on spasticity, ROM, and the balance function in patients with stroke. Methods: 30 inpatients with stroke were randomly divided into 2 groups: the ICT group (n=15) and the placebo-ICT group (n=15). Two groups have got the traditional rehabilitation for 30 minutes before applying either ICT or placebo-ICT stimulation. The stimulus of ICT has been applied to gastrocnemius at the level of 100 Hz, two times of sensation threshold, while the placebo-ICT group has put on the electrode without electrical stimulus. To assess spasticity in ankle, the modified Ashworth scale (MAS) was used, and goniometer was applied to measure the passive range of motion (PROM). Also, the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the Timed-up and go (TUG), and the Functional Reach Test (FRT) were carried out to examine the balance ability. Results: The ICT group showed a significant reduction of spasticity and significantly increased PROM than the placebo-ICT group (p<0.05). The placebo-ICT group did not show significant changes in the BBS, the TUG, and the FRT, while the ICT group significantly improved the BBS, the TUG, and the FRT (p<0.05). Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that ICT applied to gastrocnemius effectively decreased spasticity and improved range of motion and balance function in patients with stroke.

• The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.37-42
• /
• 1999

The purpose of this study was to determine whether percutaneous interferential current stimulation on thoracic sympathetic ganglia with amplitude modulated frequency (AMF) $90\~100$ bps and subthreshold of muscle contraction for 10 minutes on peripheral blood flow velocity in healthy subjects. Thirty-seven healthy volunteers were assigned randomly into an experimental group (n=25) and a control group (n=12). the experimental group received interferential current stimulation with subthreshold of the muscle contraction of current at AMF $90\~100$ bps on $1st\~5th$ thoracic sympathetic ganglial region for 10 minutes. The control group received same handling and electode placement, but no current was applied. Using a Doppler blood flow meter, the radial arterial blood flow velocities and the pulse raters were determined for two-way analysis of variance for repeated measures on time and group. There were no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the changes in arterial blood flow velocity and pulse rate over the four measurement times. Interferential current stimulation did not change in mean blood flow velocity and pulse rate. We conclude that interferential current stimulation on the thoracic sympathetic ganglia, as used in this study, did not dilate peripheral artery. This results suggests that interferential current stimulation dose not alter the activtiy of sympathetic nerve.

• 대한물리치료과학회지
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.87-92
• /
• 2011

Purpose : The purpose of this study is to have examined the influence on the blood circulation by comparing the differences between stimulating the sympathetic ganglion and the muscle group among the stimulation variables in interferential current stimulation and to have found out the most effective stimulating mode for the improvement the peripheral blood circulation in the interferential current stimulation. Method : The subjects of the study is the men and women in the twenties, who are in great condition and have no pathological report for the blood circulation influence. The intensity of the inferential current stimulation is the medium degree, 100 bps constant current, which is the comfort and overt degree to confirm the muscle contraction. The areas stimulated by the interferential current stimulation are the stellate ganglion area in the seventh cervical vertebrae and the forearm muscle area. The stimulating time is twenty minutes long. After stimulating the two areas, the change of the blood circulation has been measured. Results : Both stimulating the sympathetic ganglion and stimulating the muscle, before and after interferential current stimulation, we have seen that the amount of blood circulation was increased significantly and statistically in both two groups(p<.01) and that the amount of blood circulation was increased significantly and statistically in the case of stimulating the sympathetic ganglion(p<.01). Conclusion : The conclusion we received that inferential current stimulation had the clear influence on increasing the peripheral blood circulation. And stimulating the sympathetic ganglion area is more effective than stimulating muscle area directly.