• Title/Summary/Keyword: 가변형 간벽

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Positive Pilot Research of SBR Process with Flexible Vertical (가변형 간벽을 이용한 SBR 공정의 실증 Pilot 연구)

  • Kim, Man-Soo;Park, Jong-Woon;Park, Chul-Whi
    • Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers
    • /
    • v.27 no.4
    • /
    • pp.438-444
    • /
    • 2005
  • This study is to install the flexible vertical in order to separate not only the time but also the space in the single reactor by opening and closing the flexible vertical, and to intensify the aerobic, anaerobic and anoxic reactions by reducing the time to activate the microorganism for nitrification, denitrification, release of organic phosphate and luxury uptake of ortho-phosphate. Eventually the result of this study obtained each 90.9%, 76.4% for the removal efficiency of total nitrogen and phosphate. Also, content rate of phosphate at excess sludge was higher $25{\sim}30%$ for SBR reactor with the flexible verticals than existing SBR process. It would be concluded that SBR reactor with flexible verticals is promising for nitrogen and phosphate removal conditions than conventional SBR processes.

Estimation of Nutrient Removal Efficiency and Phase Conversion Rate of Single Reactor SBR and SBR with Flexible Vertical (단일 및 가변형 SBR 공법의 영양염류 처리효율 및 "상"전환속도 평가)

  • Kim, Man-Soo;Park, Jong-Woon;Park, Chul-Whi;Lee, Sang-Ill
    • Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers
    • /
    • v.27 no.11
    • /
    • pp.1215-1221
    • /
    • 2005
  • The purpose of this research was to compare the nutrient removal efficiency, and to estimate the net reaction time in order to calculate a "phase" transfer rate. SBR(SBR1) with flexible verticals and single reactor SBR(SBR1). Consequently, the removal efficiencies of $COD_{Cr}$, and $BOD_5$ in SBR1 and SBR2 were 91.5%, 97.5% and 90.4%, 97.3%, Respectively. Accordingly, the organic removal efficiency was not distinguished in both processes. In the T-N and T-P removal efficiencies, however, SBR1 obtained higher removal efficiency than SBR2, at 12.1% and 7.6% respectively. Also, in the experiment to estimate the "phase" transfer rate, SBR1 was higher than SBR2 Because SBR1 has two phases in the single reactor simultaneously, it has the buffer capacity to reduce the "phase" transfer time and provides a definite reaction condition.