• 제목/요약/키워드: $Regenaform^{(R)}$

검색결과 2건 처리시간 0.019초

$Regenaform^{(R)}$$Ossix^{(R)}$ 차단막을 이용한 골유도재생술: 증례보고 (GUIDED BONE REGENERATION USING $REGENAFORM^{(R)}\;AND\;OSSIX^{(R)}$ MEMBRANE: THREE CASE REPORTS)

  • 김영균;윤필영;임성철;김수관
    • Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
    • /
    • 제33권6호
    • /
    • pp.648-653
    • /
    • 2007
  • This case study investigated the clinical effect of guided bone regeneration(GBR) using $Regenaform^{(R)}\;and\;Ossix^{(R)}$ membrane and the histology of the new bone that formed just under the membranes. $Regenaform^{(R)}$ transplantation and covering with $Ossix^{(R)}$ membrane were performed to repair bone defects around implants after implantation in three patients. After $3{\sim}4$ months, the membranes were removed in a second operation, and a biopsy was taken under the membrane. The biopsies showed a bone density of $23{\sim}42%$, and subsequent prosthetic treatments were successful in all cases.

다양한 골 이식재를 이용한 골유도재생술의 골 치유에 관한 비교 연구: 예비연구 (THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GUIDED BONE REGENERATION USING VARIOUS OF BONE GRAFT MATERIALS)

  • 김영균;김수관;임성철
    • Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
    • /
    • 제33권4호
    • /
    • pp.350-358
    • /
    • 2007
  • The purpose of this study is to evaluate the superficial bony healing after guided bony regeneration using a various bone grafts. Four types of bone grafts were performed by one oral and maxillofacial surgeon to restore the defects around endosseous implants. Group I included the allografts using $Regenaform^{(R)}$. Group 2 included the autograft. Group 3 included the combined grafts using with autogenous symphysis bone and xenograft($BioOss^{(R)}$). Group 4 included the xenograft($BioOss^{(R)}$). After some heling period, superficial bone biopsy was performed with the surgical blade(#15) during the second surgery. Histologic and histomorphmetric examination were carried out by one pathologist. There was the most new bone formation in the group 3, next group 2. However, there were no statistically significant differences. All group except for group 4 showed favorable bone formation and remodeling.